IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16265-d1286966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Company-Level Factors of Non-Financial Reporting Quality under a Mandatory Regime: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Marina Radu

    (Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Voicu D. Dragomir

    (Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ningshan Hao

    (Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The relationship between non-financial reporting quality (NFRQ) and various company-level factors has been studied extensively, considering the mandatory requirements applicable under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD) of the European Union. The purpose of this research is to systematize the results of previous published studies on the relationship between NFRQ and company size, financial performance, corporate governance, market performance, and sustainability performance, under a mandatory regime. Our study contributes to the literature by proposing a taxonomy of company-level factors grouped into five categories. We analyze the post-2017 period, focusing on the application of NFRD in the European Union. By applying systematic inclusion and exclusion criteria to a population of 618 articles from Scopus, we obtain a sample of fifteen articles that are subject to an in-depth analysis of correlation matrices. The systematic review resorts to the vote counting methodology to assess the existence and strength of relationships between the NFRQ and company-level factors, based on correlation coefficients. The summarized results indicate that company size, corporate governance, and sustainability performance are positive factors of NFRQ. Regarding corporate governance, we find that board independence, board size, foreign ownership, gender diversity, corporate governance quality, the existence of a sustainability committee, and sustainability-linked remuneration positively influence NFRQ. Our findings emphasize the need to explicitly consider the role of corporate governance and sustainability performance in improving NFRQ while transitioning to improved corporate sustainability reporting under the new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive 2022/2464 (CSRD). Our study has implications for academics who seek to engage in empirical research on various factors with positive or negative influence on sustainability reporting, throughout the transition from the NFRD to the CSRD. Policymakers may find our study useful in addressing specific areas of sustainability reporting that have a negative impact on corporate transparency, while practitioners may obtain valuable information on the challenges of transitioning to sustainability reporting and the implementation of mandatory assurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Marina Radu & Voicu D. Dragomir & Ningshan Hao, 2023. "Company-Level Factors of Non-Financial Reporting Quality under a Mandatory Regime: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-32, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16265-:d:1286966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niuosha Samani & Conny Overland & Svetlana Sabelfeld, 2023. "The role of the EU non-financial reporting directive and employee representation in employee-related disclosures," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 278-306, April.
    2. Valentina Ivanović, 2013. "The Key Characteristics of Financial Reporting in the European System of Central Banks," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 2(3), pages 47-69.
    3. repec:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:47-69 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Simone Pizzi & Francesco Rosati & Andrea Venturelli, 2021. "The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 404-421, January.
    5. Lin Liao & Teng (Philip) Lin & Yuyu Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 211-225, June.
    6. Katelin Opferkuch & Sandra Caeiro & Roberta Salomone & Tomás B. Ramos, 2021. "Circular economy in corporate sustainability reporting: A review of organisational approaches," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4015-4036, December.
    7. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Pitorac & Nicoleta-Daniela Milu, 2021. "Assessment of the Mandatory Non-Financial Reporting of Romanian Companies in the Circular Economy Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Alexandra Danila & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Oana Oprisan & Tanase Stamule, 2022. "Good Practices on ESG Reporting in the Context of the European Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 847-847, August.
    9. Jyoti Mahadeo & Teerooven Soobaroyen & Vanisha Hanuman, 2012. "Board Composition and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 375-388, February.
    10. Fabio Caputo & Simone Pizzi & Lorenzo Ligorio & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3470-3484, December.
    11. Saif Ullah & Sayed Irshad Hussain & Agha Amad Nabi & Khurram Ali Mubashir, 2022. "Role of Regulatory Governance in Financial Stability: A Comparison of High and Low Income Countries," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 11(1), pages 207-226.
    12. John Richard Kurpierz & Ken Smith, 2020. "The greenwashing triangle: adapting tools from fraud to improve CSR reporting," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(6), pages 1075-1093, May.
    13. Nooraisah Katmon & Zam Zuriyati Mohamad & Norlia Mat Norwani & Omar Al Farooque, 2019. "Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 447-481, June.
    14. Jaroslaw Kaczmarek & Sergio Luis Nanez Alonso & Andrzej Sokolowski & Kamil Fijorek & Sabina Denkowska, 2021. "Financial threat profiles of industrial enterprises in Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 463-498, June.
    15. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xingwen Chen & Li Zhu & Chao Liu & Chunhua Chen & Jun Liu & Dongxia Huo, 2023. "Workplace Diversity in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1021-1045, September.
    2. Imperiale, Francesca & Pizzi, Simone & Lippolis, Stella, 2023. "Sustainability reporting and ESG performance in the utilities sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    4. Nguyen, Thi Hong Hanh & Ntim, Collins G. & Malagila, John K., 2020. "Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    6. Giovanna Campopiano & Patricia Gabaldón & Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez, 2023. "Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance: An Integrative Review of the Literature and a Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 717-746, January.
    7. Bigelli, Marco & Mengoli, Stefano & Sandri, Sandro, 2023. "ESG score, board structure and the impact of the non-financial reporting directive on European firms," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Pengyu Chen & Zhongzhu Chu, 2024. "Mere facade? Is greenwashing behaviour lower in low‐carbon corporates?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4162-4174, July.
    9. Ge Wang & Huijin Zhang & Saixing Zeng & Xiaohua Meng & Han Lin, 2023. "Reporting on sustainable development: Configurational effects of top management team and corporate characteristics on environmental information disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 28-52, January.
    10. Aladdin Dwekat & Elies Seguí‐Mas & Guillermina Tormo‐Carbó & Pedro Carmona, 2020. "Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2879-2892, November.
    11. Elliroma Gardiner, 2024. "What’s age got to do with it? The effect of board member age diversity: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 65-92, February.
    12. Meng, Qingbin & Wang, Song & Zhong, Ziya, 2024. "The effect of directors' and officers' liabilities insurance on corporate social responsibility evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Faisal Hameed & Mohammad Alfaraj & Khizar Hameed, 2023. "The Association of Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Quality: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Dorota Dobija & Claudia Arena & Łukasz Kozłowski & Joanna Krasodomska & Justyna Godawska, 2023. "Towards sustainable development: The role of directors' international orientation and their diversity for non‐financial disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 66-90, January.
    15. Zhe Ji & Radouane Abdoune, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Performance in China: Does the Background of Foreign Women Directors Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Beloskar, Ved Dilip & Haldar, Arunima & Gupta, Anupama, 2024. "Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A bibliometric review of the literature on SDG 5 through the management lens," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi & Belal Ali Abdulraheem Ghaleb & Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed & Sitraselvi Chandren & Zaimah Abdullah, 2022. "Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Ranjita Islam & Erica French & Muhammad Ali, 2022. "Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1134-1145, September.
    19. I-Ju Chen & Wei Chih Lin & Huai-Chun Lo & Sheng-Syan Chen, 2023. "Board diversity and corporate innovation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 63-123, July.
    20. Ayman Issa & Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2023. "Achieving sustainable business: The nexus between external sustainability assurance, CSR strategy and emission reduction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3095-3109, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16265-:d:1286966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.