IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15808-d1277412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Work and Non-Work Support on Employee Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support

Author

Listed:
  • Huong Le

    (School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Melbourne Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Neena Gopalan

    (School of Business, University of Redlands, Redlands, CA 92373, USA)

  • Joohan Lee

    (Sorrell College of Business, Troy University, Troy, AL 36082, USA)

  • Isuru Kirige

    (Department of Management and Marketing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Amlan Haque

    (School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Sydney Campus, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Vanita Yadav

    (Urban Transformations Research Centre, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia)

  • Victoria Lambropoulos

    (School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Melbourne Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Familial and organizational support are important for employees to sustain quality of life and workplace performance. Grounded in the conservation of resources theory, this study explored the underlying mechanism between family member support and employee well-being. Specifically, we examined how the relationship is mediated by psychological capital, and how perceived organizational support amplifies the effect of familial support on psychological capital. Using survey data from 231 Vietnamese employees, results showed that family member support positively predicted employee well-being. This relationship was mediated by psychological capital. Additionally, the relationship between family member support and psychological capital was moderated by perceived organizational support, becoming stronger under conditions of high organizational support. This study offers important theoretical implications regarding the roles of family and organizational support in impacting employee well-being and happiness. Additionally, it provides practical implications for strategic human resource management, highlighting approaches to develop a socially sustainable work environment that promotes employee well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Huong Le & Neena Gopalan & Joohan Lee & Isuru Kirige & Amlan Haque & Vanita Yadav & Victoria Lambropoulos, 2023. "Impact of Work and Non-Work Support on Employee Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15808-:d:1277412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Mao & Jie He & Alastair M. Morrison & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak, 2021. "Effects of tourism CSR on employee psychological capital in the COVID-19 crisis: from the perspective of conservation of resources theory," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(19), pages 2716-2734, October.
    2. Niklas Nolzen, 2018. "The concept of psychological capital: a comprehensive review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 237-277, August.
    3. Anna Lau & Robert Cummins & Wenda Mcpherson, 2005. "An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 403-430, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md. Mynul Islam & Kyoko Kusakabe, 2024. "Ways of Spouse Support in Garment Workers’ Workplace Resistance: A Qualitative Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huimei Liu & Bin Yu, 2015. "Serious Leisure, Leisure Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being of Chinese University Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 159-174, May.
    2. Lufanna Lai & Robert Cummins & Anna Lau, 2013. "Cross-Cultural Difference in Subjective Wellbeing: Cultural Response Bias as an Explanation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 607-619, November.
    3. Felicia Huppert & Nic Marks & Andrew Clark & Johannes Siegrist & Alois Stutzer & Joar Vittersø & Morten Wahrendorf, 2009. "Measuring Well-being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and Preliminary Findings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 301-315, May.
    4. Jorge J. Varela & Javier Guzmán & Jaime Alfaro & Fernando Reyes, 2019. "Bullying, Cyberbullying, Student Life Satisfaction and the Community of Chilean Adolescents," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(3), pages 705-720, July.
    5. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    6. Barrington-Leigh, C.P., 2024. "The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Phyllis King Shui Wong, 2022. "Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Group-Based Self-Determination Enhancement Intervention for Adults with Mild Intellectual Disability and Their Caregi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Vinod Mishra & Ingrid Nielsen & Russell Smyth, 2014. "How Does Relative Income and Variations in Short-Run Wellbeing Affect Wellbeing in the Long Run? Empirical Evidence From China’s Korean Minority," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 67-91, January.
    9. Gareth Davey & Ricardo Rato, 2012. "Subjective Wellbeing in China: A Review," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 333-346, April.
    10. NAHAR Hairul Suhaimi & MOHAMAD Maslinawati, 2023. "Academic Research Responses To Covid-19: The Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 171-197, April.
    11. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Schatz, Enid & Gómez-Olivé, Xavier & Ralston, Margaret & Menken, Jane & Tollman, Stephen, 2012. "The impact of pensions on health and wellbeing in rural South Africa: Does gender matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1864-1873.
    13. Phyllis King Shui Wong & Amy Yin Man Chow, 2021. "Self-Determination Competencies, (Dis)Agreement in Decision-Making, and Personal Well-Being of Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Eugene F. Borokhovski & Dmitry V. Vorontsov, 2023. "Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 695-729, June.
    15. Zhanjun Xing & Liqing Huang, 2014. "The Relationship Between Age and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Five Capital Cities in Mainland China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 743-756, July.
    16. Chien-Tat Low & Robert Stimson & Si Chen & Ester Cerin & Paulina Pui-Yun Wong & Poh-Chin Lai, 2018. "Personal and Neighbourhood Indicators of Quality of Urban Life: A Case Study of Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 751-773, April.
    17. Ingrid Nielsen & Olga Paritski & Russell Smyth, 2010. "Subjective Well-Being of Beijing Taxi Drivers," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(6), pages 721-733, December.
    18. Ferran Casas & Jorge Sarriera & Jaime Alfaro & Mònica González & Sara Malo & Irma Bertran & Cristina Figuer & Daniel Cruz & Lívia Bedin & Angela Paradiso & Karin Weinreich & Boris Valdenegro, 2012. "Testing the Personal Wellbeing Index on 12–16 Year-Old Adolescents in 3 Different Countries with 2 New Items," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 461-482, February.
    19. Wang, Yean & Xu, Shuge & Liu, Lin & Chen, Yue & Zheng, Guanghuai, 2024. "Exploring the role of child-friendly communities in alleviating the turbulence of psychological reactance among educationally disadvantaged youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Alexandra Ganglmair-Wooliscroft & Rob Lawson, 2012. "Subjective Wellbeing and its Influence on Consumer Sentiment Towards Marketing: A New Zealand Example," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 149-166, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15808-:d:1277412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.