IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15414-d1270226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Governance and Sustainable Development in Elderly Services: Innovative Models, Strategies, and Stakeholder Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Huaiyue Wang

    (School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada)

  • Peter C. Coyte

    (Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada)

  • Weiwei Shi

    (School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Xu Zong

    (Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Renyao Zhong

    (School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

Introduction: The global demographic shift towards an aging population has created an urgent need for high-quality elderly care services. This study focuses on “elder services” within the framework of sustainable development, addressing seniors with intensive care needs and independent seniors. Methods—Social Governance: To understand the social governance aspects, we employ a qualitative methodology, analyzing policy documents, novel care methods, and successful case studies. Sustainable Development: Simultaneously, our study investigates sustainable development, examining the methods used to promote sustainability in geriatric care. Research Question: Our research question centers on identifying strategies that foster inclusivity and sustainability in elder services, considering diverse needs, housing, community involvement, and the role of technology. Results: We identified innovative models aimed at improving the well-being of older individuals, including community-driven initiatives, technology-assisted solutions, holistic wellness programs, intergenerational interaction programs, and the integration of traditional and modern care methods. We explored stakeholder perspectives, providing insights into the complexities of implementing effective elderly care solutions. Our study evaluated the efficiency of diversified social governance models in geriatric care, highlighting their benefits compared to traditional models. We presented specific concerns and suggestions from stakeholders regarding sustainable development in geriatric care. Discussion: Our findings underscored the importance of collaboration among various stakeholders to enhance elderly care. Our study summarizes key insights from current policies and anticipated future trajectories in geriatric care, providing a foundation for developing sustainable elderly care facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaiyue Wang & Peter C. Coyte & Weiwei Shi & Xu Zong & Renyao Zhong, 2023. "Social Governance and Sustainable Development in Elderly Services: Innovative Models, Strategies, and Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15414-:d:1270226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. S. Zhikharevich & V. V. Klimanov & V. G. Maracha, 2021. "Resilience of a Territory: Concept, Measurement, Governance," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, January.
    2. Miao Li & Muhammad Shaukat Malik & Mahrukh Ijaz & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Employer Responses to Poaching on Employee Productivity: The Mediating Role of Organizational Agility in Technology Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Barbara L. Marshall & Nicole K. Dalmer & Stephen Katz & Eugene Loos & Daniel López Gómez & Alexander Peine, 2022. "Digitization of Aging-in-Place: An International Comparison of the Value-Framing of New Technologies," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Edward Oughton, 2021. "Policy options for digital infrastructure strategies: A simulation model for broadband universal service in Africa," Papers 2102.03561, arXiv.org.
    5. Cao, Jidi & Chen, Xin & Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua, 2021. "Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. M. Hasan & Shakhawat Hossain & M. Mofijur & Zobaidul Kabir & Irfan Anjum Badruddin & T. M. Yunus Khan & Esam Jassim, 2023. "Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Andrey Polyachenko, 2022. "The resilience of Russian Arctic cities 1989–2017," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 796-825, August.
    3. Yanhua Liang & Hongjuan Lu, 2022. "Dynamic Evaluation and Regional Differences Analysis of the NEV Industry Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Nicolas Charles & Gaétan Lefebvre & Rémy Tuloup & Audrey Carreaud & Antoine Boubault & Anne-Sophie Serrand & Maxime Picault & Virginie Piguet & Valeria Manzin & Fabien Deswarte & Julien Aupoil, 2023. "Mineral Resource Abundance: An Assessment Methodology for a Responsible Use of Mineral Raw Materials in Downstream Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-39, December.
    5. V. V. Akimova & A. A. Voloshinskaya & V. M. Komarov, 2023. "The Waning Strategy Phenomenon: Definition and Assessment Methodology," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 458-469, September.
    6. Andreea-Ileana Zamfir & Elena Oana Croitoru & Cristina Burlacioiu & Cosmin Dobrin, 2022. "Renewable Energies: Economic and Energy Impact in the Context of Increasing the Share of Electric Cars in EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Edward J. Oughton & Ashutosh Jha, 2021. "Supportive 5G Infrastructure Policies are Essential for Universal 6G: Assessment using an Open-source Techno-economic Simulation Model utilizing Remote Sensing," Papers 2102.08086, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    8. Miaojie Chen & Mehtab Babar & Ammar Ahmed & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of Enterprise Social Media on Employees’ Competency through the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Nam Hoai Nguyen & Quynh T. Tran & Thao V. Nguyen & Nam Tran & Leon Roose & Saeed Sepasi & Maria Luisa Di Silvestre, 2023. "A Method for Assessing the Feasibility of Integrating Planned Unidirectional EV Chargers into the Distribution Grid: A Case Study in Danang, Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. M. Yu. Malkina, 2022. "The Resilience of the Russian Regional Economies to the 2020 Pandemic," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 309-320, September.
    11. Evi Steelyana W. & Nur Afiah Nunuy & Dewi Nanny & Wahyuni Ersa Tri & Avianti Ilya, 2024. "Policy Strategies for Public–Private Partnership on Broadband Infrastructure: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23.
    12. Almansour, Mohammed, 2022. "Electric vehicles (EV) and sustainability: Consumer response to twin transition, the role of e-businesses and digital marketing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. O. V. Kuznetsova, 2022. "The Transformation of the Spatial Structure of an Economy in the Crisis and Post-Crisis Periods," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 451-458, December.
    14. Nasir Javed Awan, 2024. "Unveiling Charismatic Leadership: Catalysts of Positive Work Attitude, Job Involvement, and Work Engagement," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 532-545.
    15. Faissal Jelti & Amine Allouhi & Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul, 2023. "Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Hridoy Roy & Bimol Nath Roy & Md. Hasanuzzaman & Md. Shahinoor Islam & Ayman S. Abdel-Khalik & Mostaf S. Hamad & Shehab Ahmed, 2022. "Global Advancements and Current Challenges of Electric Vehicle Batteries and Their Prospects: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Roemer, Ellen & Henseler, Jörg, 2022. "The dynamics of electric vehicle acceptance in corporate fleets: Evidence from Germany," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Marek Guzek & Jerzy Jackowski & Rafał S. Jurecki & Emilia M. Szumska & Piotr Zdanowicz & Marcin Żmuda, 2024. "Electric Vehicles—An Overview of Current Issues—Part 1—Environmental Impact, Source of Energy, Recycling, and Second Life of Battery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    19. O. V. Kuznetsova, 2021. "Economy of Russian Regions in the Pandemic: Are Resilience Factors At Work?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 419-427, October.
    20. Bing Yan & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Yuting Huang, 2022. "A Hybrid Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Framework and Its Application in Urban Rail Transit System Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15414-:d:1270226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.