IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15329-d1268158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Supply Chain Collaboration, Collaborative Advantage, and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Role of Government Subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Liu

    (School of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Chenghao Jiao

    (School of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Yudong Zhang

    (School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK)

  • Jiaji Wang

    (School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK)

Abstract

Supply chain collaboration is acknowledged for its benefits, but realizing these advantages can be challenging. The role of government subsidies in supply chain collaboration, collaborative advantage, and firm performance remains unclear. In this study, we explored how supply chain collaboration can enhance firm performance and the roles of collaborative advantage and government subsidies in that process. Firstly, we reviewed the related literature and proposed our hypotheses. Secondly, we formulated an innovative theoretical framework and issued our questionnaire after a pilot study. After collecting and evaluating the sample data, we utilized structural equation modeling to comprehensively examine those relationships in a supply chain, unlike the previous studies on trust, firm size, etc. Lastly, in the context of government interventions, this study addresses the question: “To what extent do government subsidies influence the relationships among supply chain collaboration, collaborative advantage, and firm performance?” Our findings indicate that supply chain collaboration is fundamental in shaping collaborative advantage and firm performance, while collaborative advantage is crucial in enhancing firm performance. Additionally, government support in the form of subsidies acts as a catalyst, further enhancing the positive outcomes of supply chain collaboration and ultimately benefiting firm performance. This research underscores the strategic significance of supply chain collaboration and government subsidies in promoting overall business success. By illuminating the roles of collaborative advantage and government subsidies in this context, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamic capability involved in achieving improved firm performance through effective supply chain collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Liu & Chenghao Jiao & Yudong Zhang & Jiaji Wang, 2023. "Linking Supply Chain Collaboration, Collaborative Advantage, and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Role of Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15329-:d:1268158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirti Nayal & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Pragati Priyadarshinee & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "RETRACTED: The impact of sustainable development strategy on sustainable supply chain firm performance in the digital transformation era," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 845-859, March.
    2. Ma, Hoi-Lam & Wang, Z.X. & Chan, Felix T.S., 2020. "How important are supply chain collaborative factors in supply chain finance? A view of financial service providers in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 341-346.
    3. Cao, Mei & Zhang, Qingyu, 2010. "Supply chain collaborative advantage: A firm's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 358-367, November.
    4. De Lima, Felipe Alexandre & Seuring, Stefan, 2023. "A Delphi study examining risk and uncertainty management in circular supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    6. Shah, Syed Ale Raza & Zhang, Qianxiao & Abbas, Jaffar & Tang, Hui & Al-Sulaiti, Khalid Ibrahim, 2023. "Waste management, quality of life and natural resources utilization matter for renewable electricity generation: The main and moderate role of environmental policy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Chen, Xiangyu & Tongurai, Jittima, 2023. "Informational linkage and price discovery between China's futures and spot markets: Evidence from the US–China trade dispute," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Chen, Jing & Pun, Hubert & Zhang, Qiao, 2023. "Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 659-673.
    9. Allen Kaufman & Craig H. Wood & Gregory Theyel, 2000. "Collaboration and technology linkages: a strategic supplier typology," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 649-663, June.
    10. Holweg, Matthias & Disney, Stephen & Holmström, Jan & Småros, Johanna, 2005. "Supply Chain Collaboration:: Making Sense of the Strategy Continuum," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 170-181, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge E. Hernández & Josefa Mula & Raúl Poler & Andrew C. Lyons, 2014. "Collaborative Planning in Multi-tier Supply Chains Supported by a Negotiation-Based Mechanism and Multi-agent System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 235-269, March.
    2. Cao, Mei & Zhang, Qingyu, 2010. "Supply chain collaborative advantage: A firm's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 358-367, November.
    3. Jiguang Wang & Bing Ran, 2018. "Sustainable Collaborative Governance in Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Masten, Kurt A. & Kim, Seung-Lae, 2015. "So many mechanisms, so little action: The case for 3rd party supply chain coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 13-20.
    5. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition of domestic manufacturer and foreign supplier under sustainable development objectives of government," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 294-308.
    6. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Atul B. Borade & Ali Diabat & Devika Kannan, 2013. "An evaluation of vendor managed inventory practices from small and medium indian enterprises," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(sup1), pages 76-95, June.
    7. Shizhen Bai & Ling Ge & Xuelian Zhang, 2022. "Platform or direct channel: government-subsidized recycling strategies for WEEE," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 347-369, June.
    8. Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Jiafu Su, 2023. "Unveiling the Influence: Exploring the Impact of Interrelationships among E-Commerce Supply Chain Members on Supply Chain Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Song Wei & Gao Liang & Pan Gang, 2014. "Effects of R&D Cooperation to Innovation Performance in Open Innovation Environment," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(5), pages 151-160, May.
    10. Winkler, Lorenz & Kilic, Onur A. & Veldman, Jasper, 2022. "Collaboration in the offshore wind farm decommissioning supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Jian Li & Weihao Du & Fengmei Yang & Guowei Hua, 2014. "The Carbon Subsidy Analysis in Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2018. "How transport costs affect the decision to purchase a new or a remanufactured good," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 529-542, August.
    13. Dharm Dev Bhatta & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Marius Pislaru, 2023. "The Nexus of Corporate Affinity for Technology and Firm Sustainable Performance in the Era of Digitalization: A Mediated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Contractor, Farok J. & Ra, Wonchan, 2002. "How knowledge attributes influence alliance governance choices: A theory development note," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 11-27.
    16. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Serkan Alacam & Asli Sencer, 2021. "Using Blockchain Technology to Foster Collaboration among Shippers and Carriers in the Trucking Industry: A Design Science Research Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Eva Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, 2009. "Improving the effectiveness of academic-business models: an analysis of obstacles in R&D activities in service industries," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 3(4), pages 395-413, December.
    19. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Yu Gong & Xiaojiang Xu & Changping Zhao & Tobias Schoenherr, 2024. "Multi-Tier Supply Chain Learning Networks: A Simulation Study Based on the Experience-Weighted Attraction (EWA) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15329-:d:1268158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.