IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15114-d1264273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometrical Parcel Locker Network Design with Consideration of Users’ Preferences as a Solution for Sustainable Last Mile Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Kurowski

    (Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Marek Sobolewski

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Zielona Góra, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Maciej Koszorek

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Zielona Góra, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland)

Abstract

Last mile logistics accounts for a small part of deliveries geographically, but generates disproportionately high costs, energy consumption, and pollutant emissions. Parcel lockers are a solution with great potential to make deliveries more sustainable. In order to use this potential, the network should be designed in such a way that users are willing to collect parcels on foot or by bicycle and to use a given number of parcel lockers to cover as much area as possible. This area is still unexplored. The purpose of this article is to present a geometric method for designing a network of parcel lockers taking into account user preferences. Authors have used methods such as literature studies, survey, and statistical analysis. The analysis conducted showed that using a triangular network allows for greater coverage than a square one with the same number of parcel lockers. The median declared distance to allow regular parcel collection by walking or cycling was 500 m. Characteristics such as gender, age, education, and type of residence did not affect this parameter. Implementing data on customer preferences into the design of a parcel locker network and using a triangular network of parcel lockers allows for deliveries to be more sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Kurowski & Marek Sobolewski & Maciej Koszorek, 2023. "Geometrical Parcel Locker Network Design with Consideration of Users’ Preferences as a Solution for Sustainable Last Mile Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15114-:d:1264273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15114/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15114/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Wang & Yumeng Zhang & Mengyu Bi & Jianhui Lai & Yanyan Chen, 2022. "A Robust Optimization Method for Location Selection of Parcel Lockers under Uncertain Demands," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Maren Schnieder & Chris Hinde & Andrew West, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis of Emission Models of Parcel Lockers vs. Home Delivery Based on HBEFA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Niederprüm, Antonia & van Lienden, Willem, 2021. "Parcel locker stations: A solution for the last mile?," WIK Working Papers 2, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH, Bad Honnef.
    4. Kahr, Michael, 2022. "Determining locations and layouts for parcel lockers to support supply chain viability at the last mile," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pejman Peykani & Mostafa Sargolzaei & Mohammad Hashem Botshekan & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Amir Takaloo, 2023. "Optimization of Asset and Liability Management of Banks with Minimum Possible Changes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Liu, Ming & Ding, Yueyu & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Zheng, Feifeng, 2024. "Robust actions for improving supply chain resilience and viability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Leung, Abraham & Lachapelle, Ugo & Burke, Matthew, 2023. "Spatio-temporal analysis of Australia Post parcel locker use during the initial system growth phase in Queensland (2013–2017)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Maren Schnieder & Chris Hinde & Andrew West, 2022. "Emission Estimation of On-Demand Meal Delivery Services Using a Macroscopic Simulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Wang, Yang & Bi, Mengyu & Lai, Jianhui & Wang, Chenxi & Chen, Yanyan & Holguín-Veras, José, 2024. "Recourse strategy for the routing problem of mobile parcel lockers with time windows under uncertain demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 942-957.
    6. Maren Schnieder & Chris Hinde & Andrew West, 2022. "Land Efficient Mobility: Evaluation of Autonomous Last Mile Delivery Concepts in London," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Cheng, Chun & Yu, Qinxiao & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2024. "Distributionally robust facility location with uncertain facility capacity and customer demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Triki, Chefi, 2023. "Locker box location planning under uncertainty in demand and capacity availability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2024. "Last-Mile logistics with on-premises parcel Lockers: Who are the real Beneficiaries?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Anton-Sanchez, Laura & Landete, Mercedes & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2023. "The discrete p-center location problem with upgrading," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Chen, Liuyan & Wu, Pengkun & Dou, Yudan & Wu, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Investigating senders’ switching intention to smart lockers: An extension of push-pull-mooring model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Ivanov, Dmitry & Keskin, Burcu B., 2023. "Post-pandemic adaptation and development of supply chain viability theory," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15114-:d:1264273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.