IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14987-d1261814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Digital Transformation of Workplace: The Social Representation of Home-Office

Author

Listed:
  • Luiz Antonio Joia

    (Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration, Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV EBAPE), Rio de Janeiro 22231-010, Brazil)

  • Lineu Fachin Leonardo

    (Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration, Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV EBAPE), Rio de Janeiro 22231-010, Brazil)

Abstract

In March 2020, with the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a pandemic and prescribing social isolation to combat this coronavirus, companies began to implement home-office, with employees working from their homes through Information and Communication Technology. Thus, this study aims to identify how Human Resources professionals in Brazil made sense of the home-office policy adopted by their companies during the COVID-19 pandemic, given that this country was severely impacted by this disease, which led to the implementation of social isolation for several months. In consideration of this, this research applied the Social Representation Theory, operationalized via the evocation of words technique and implicative analysis. In doing so, a positive and less comprehensive view of Human Resources professionals was identified vis-à-vis the academic literature in relation to the enactment of home-office via companies during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may be due to the time interval in which this research was carried out, the consequent impacts resulting from the implementation of the home-office at the time of data collection, and the very fact that most of the literature researched came from developed countries and not from the Global South where this research was carried out. Flexibility and Quality of Life were the dimensions most associated with the social representation of home-office according to Human Resources professionals. However, the productivity dimension related to working in a home-office showed dubious and inconclusive results. Finally, some challenging aspects related to this model of work raised by the scientific literature were not mentioned by the respondents, indicating a mismatch between the academic literature and the understanding of Human Resources professionals about the role of home-office during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiz Antonio Joia & Lineu Fachin Leonardo, 2023. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Digital Transformation of Workplace: The Social Representation of Home-Office," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14987-:d:1261814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luiz Antonio Joia & José Carlos P. Correia, 2018. "CIO Competencies From the IT Professional Perspective: Insights From Brazil," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 26(2), pages 74-103, April.
    2. Luiz Antonio Joia & Flavia Michelotto, 2020. "Universalists or Utilitarianists? The Social Representation of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Groen, Bianca A.C. & van Triest, Sander P. & Coers, Michael & Wtenweerde, Neeke, 2018. "Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 727-735.
    4. Luiz Antonio Joia & Flavia Michelotto & Manuela Lorenzo, 2022. "Sustainability and the Social Representation of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Missing Link," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Francisco Antonio Coelho Junior & Cristiane Faiad & Mariana Carolina Barbosa Rego & Wilsa Maria Ramos, 2020. "What Brazilian workers think about flexible work and telework?," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1), pages 16-31.
    6. Eva Thulin & Bertil Vilhelmson & Martina Johansson, 2019. "New Telework, Time Pressure, and Time Use Control in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Purificación López-Igual & Paula Rodríguez-Modroño, 2020. "Who is Teleworking and Where from? Exploring the Main Determinants of Telework in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aniela Balacescu & Aurelia Patrascu & Loredana Maria Paunescu, 2021. "Adaptability to Teleworking in European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 683-683, August.
    2. Jose Alberto Lara-Pulido & Adan L. Martinez-Cruz, 2023. "Stated benefits of teleworking in Mexico City: a discrete choice experiment on office workers," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1743-1807, October.
    3. Soga, Lebene Richmond & Bolade-Ogunfodun, Yemisi & Mariani, Marcello & Nasr, Rita & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 648-662.
    4. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Batur, Irfan & Dirks, Abbie & Pendyala, Ram M. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2024. "An investigation of individual-level telework arrangements in the COVID-era," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Jihad FRAIJ & Nemer ABURUMMAN, 2021. "How Does Telework Act As A Solution To The Public Sector In The Time Of Pandemic?," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 13-24, June.
    6. Sandra Figueiredo & Raquel João & Laura Alho & João Hipólito, 2022. "Psychological Research on Sleep Problems and Adjustment of Working Hours during Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Claudiu George Bocean & Luminita Popescu & Anca Antoaneta Varzaru & Costin Daniel Avram & Anica Iancu, 2023. "Work-Life Balance and Employee Satisfaction during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Ellen Lagrell & Ana Gil Solá, 2021. "Car Use of the Carless in Sweden: Everyday Life Conditions for Reducing Car Dependence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Mahmood Rehmani & Nazia Farheen & Munnawar Naz Khokhar & Afia Khalid & Ali F. Dalain & Huda Irshad, 2023. "How Does Transformational Leadership Stimulate Employee Innovative Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    10. Downes, Rebecca & Daellenbach, Urs & Donnelly, Noelle, 2023. "Remote control: Attitude monitoring and informal control in distributed teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Mehmet Güney Celbiş & Pui-Hang Wong & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Innovativeness, Work Flexibility, and Place Characteristics: A Spatial Econometric and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Maëlle Périssé & Anne-Marie Vonthron & Émilie Vayre, 2021. "Nomadic, Informal and Mediatised Work Practices: Role of Professional Social Approval and Effects on Quality of Life at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Emilio Bisetti & Benjamin Tengelsen & Ariel Zetlin‐Jones, 2022. "Moral Hazard In Remote Teams," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1595-1623, November.
    15. Nadezda Krasilnikova & Meike Levin-Keitel, 2022. "Telework as a Game-Changer for Sustainability? Transitions in Work, Workplace and Socio-Spatial Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Justine M. Y. Chim & Tien Li Chen, 2023. "Prediction of Work from Home and Musculoskeletal Discomfort: An Investigation of Ergonomic Factors in Work Arrangements and Home Workstation Setups Using the COVID-19 Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Elldér, Erik, 2020. "Telework and daily travel: New evidence from Sweden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Luiz Antonio Joia & Flavia Michelotto & Manuela Lorenzo, 2022. "Sustainability and the Social Representation of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Missing Link," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Andrei Georgian & Militaru Gheorghe, 2022. "The influence of telework on organizational performance: Evidence from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 887-893, August.
    20. Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė & Ilona Valantinaitė & Romualdas Kliukas, 2021. "Communion, Care, and Leadership in Computer-Mediated Learning during the Early Stage of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14987-:d:1261814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.