IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14831-d1258885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Performance of Polycrystalline and Monocrystalline PV Technologies in a Hot and Arid Region: An Experimental Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Benghanem

    (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sofiane Haddad

    (Department of Electronics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Jijel, Jijel 18000, Algeria)

  • Ahmed Alzahrani

    (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Adel Mellit

    (Department of Electronics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Jijel, Jijel 18000, Algeria)

  • Hamad Almohamadi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muna Khushaim

    (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, P.O. Box 30002, Madinah 41447, Saudi Arabia
    Innovation and Strategic Research Labs, Taibah University, P.O. Box 30002, Madinah 41447, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Salah Aida

    (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In arid regions, the behavior of solar panels changes significantly compared to the datasheets provided by the manufacturer. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the performance of both polycrystalline and monocrystalline solar modules in an arid region characterized by a large potential for solar irradiation and high temperatures. The influence of environmental parameters, such as temperature and dust, on the output power of solar modules with different technologies (monocrystalline and polycrystalline) has been investigated. The Artificial Hummingbirds Algorithm (AHA) has been used to extract parameters for PV modules. As a result, it has been demonstrated that for high solar irradiation, the polycrystalline PV module experiences a smaller decrease in output power than the monocrystalline PV module as the module temperature increases. The percentage drop in output power is approximately 14% for the polycrystalline PV module and nearly 16% for the monocrystalline PV module. However, for low solar irradiation, it is advisable to use monocrystalline modules, as a 21% decrease in power was observed for polycrystalline modules compared to a 9% decrease for monocrystalline modules. Additionally, the monocrystalline PV module was more affected by dust than the polycrystalline PV module under high solar irradiation conditions, while under low incident solar radiation, the polycrystalline PV module was more affected by dust than the monocrystalline PV module. The power drop of the monocrystalline PV module was greater than that of the polycrystalline PV module for high solar radiation (>500 W/m 2 ). Therefore, the advantage of this proposed work is to recommend the use of polycrystalline solar panels in regions characterized by high solar irradiation and high temperatures instead of monocrystalline solar panels, which are more efficient in regions worldwide characterized by low solar irradiation and low temperatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Benghanem & Sofiane Haddad & Ahmed Alzahrani & Adel Mellit & Hamad Almohamadi & Muna Khushaim & Mohamed Salah Aida, 2023. "Evaluation of the Performance of Polycrystalline and Monocrystalline PV Technologies in a Hot and Arid Region: An Experimental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14831-:d:1258885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chokmaviroj, Somchai & Wattanapong, Rakwichian & Suchart, Yammen, 2006. "Performance of a 500kWP grid connected photovoltaic system at Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 19-28.
    2. Phinikarides, Alexander & Kindyni, Nitsa & Makrides, George & Georghiou, George E., 2014. "Review of photovoltaic degradation rate methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 143-152.
    3. Sharma, Vikrant & Chandel, S.S., 2013. "Performance analysis of a 190 kWp grid interactive solar photovoltaic power plant in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 476-485.
    4. Benghanem, M. & Al-Mashraqi, A.A. & Daffallah, K.O., 2016. "Performance of solar cells using thermoelectric module in hot sites," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Purohit, Ishan & Purohit, Pallav, 2018. "Performance assessment of grid-interactive solar photovoltaic projects under India’s national solar mission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 25-41.
    2. Emmanuel, Michael & Akinyele, Daniel & Rayudu, Ramesh, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of a 10 kWp utility interactive photovoltaic system at Maungaraki school, Wellington, New Zealand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 573-583.
    3. Adnan Aslam & Naseer Ahmed & Safian Ahmed Qureshi & Mohsen Assadi & Naveed Ahmed, 2022. "Advances in Solar PV Systems; A Comprehensive Review of PV Performance, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-52, October.
    4. Goel, Sonali & Sharma, Renu, 2017. "Performance evaluation of stand alone, grid connected and hybrid renewable energy systems for rural application: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1378-1389.
    5. Savvakis, Nikolaos & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2015. "Performance assessment of a thin film photovoltaic system under actual Mediterranean climate conditions in the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1435-1455.
    6. Zoltan Corba & Bane Popadic & Dragan Milicevic & Boris Dumnic & Vladimir A. Katic, 2020. "A Long-Term Condition Monitoring and Performance Assessment of Grid Connected PV Power Plant with High Power Sizing Factor under Partial Shading Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Atsu, Divine & Seres, Istvan & Aghaei, Mohammadreza & Farkas, Istvan, 2020. "Analysis of long-term performance and reliability of PV modules under tropical climatic conditions in sub-Saharan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 285-295.
    8. Sasitharanuwat, Achitpon & Rakwichian, Wattanapong & Ketjoy, Nipon & Yammen, Suchart, 2007. "Performance evaluation of a 10kWp PV power system prototype for isolated building in Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1288-1300.
    9. Srivastava, Raj Shekhar & Kumar, Anuruddh & Thakur, Harishchandra & Vaish, Rahul, 2022. "Solar assisted thermoelectric cooling/heating system for vehicle cabin during parking: A numerical study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 384-403.
    10. Mohanty, Sthitapragyan & Patra, Prashanta K. & Sahoo, Sudhansu S. & Mohanty, Asit, 2017. "Forecasting of solar energy with application for a growing economy like India: Survey and implication," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 539-553.
    11. Poddar, V.S. & Ranawade, V.A. & Dhokey, N.B., 2022. "Study of synergy between photovoltaic, thermoelectric and direct evaporative cooling system for improved performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 817-826.
    12. Kahoul, Nabil & Chenni, Rachid & Cheghib, Hocine & Mekhilef, Saad, 2017. "Evaluating the reliability of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules in harsh environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 66-72.
    13. Liang, Tao & Fu, Tong & Hu, Cong & Chen, Xiaohang & Su, Shanhe & Chen, Jincan, 2021. "Optimum matching of photovoltaic–thermophotovoltaic cells efficiently utilizing full-spectrum solar energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 942-952.
    14. Aziz, Ali Saleh & Tajuddin, Mohammad Faridun Naim & Adzman, Mohd Rafi & Azmi, Azralmukmin & Ramli, Makbul A.M., 2019. "Optimization and sensitivity analysis of standalone hybrid energy systems for rural electrification: A case study of Iraq," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 775-792.
    15. Rediske, Graciele & Michels, Leandro & Siluk, Julio Cezar Mairesse & Rigo, Paula Donaduzzi & Rosa, Carmen Brum & Lima, Andrei Cunha, 2024. "A proposed set of indicators for evaluating the performance of the operation and maintenance of photovoltaic plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PA).
    16. Jahangiri, Mehdi & Rezaei, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Goojani, Afsaneh Raiesi & Saghaei, Hamed & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin, 2022. "Prioritization of solar electricity and hydrogen co-production stations considering PV losses and different types of solar trackers: A TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 889-903.
    17. Aziz, Ali Saleh & Tajuddin, Mohammad Faridun Naim & Adzman, Mohd Rafi & Mohammed, Mohd Fayzul & Ramli, Makbul A.M., 2020. "Feasibility analysis of grid-connected and islanded operation of a solar PV microgrid system: A case study of Iraq," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Milosavljević, Dragana D. & Pavlović, Tomislav M. & Piršl, Danica S., 2015. "Performance analysis of A grid-connected solar PV plant in Niš, republic of Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 423-435.
    19. Kane, Aarti & Verma, Vishal & Singh, Bhim, 2017. "Optimization of thermoelectric cooling technology for an active cooling of photovoltaic panel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1295-1305.
    20. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2017. "Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-587.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14831-:d:1258885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.