IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14716-d1257125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Deep Learning-Based Vehicle Motion Prediction for Autonomous Driving

Author

Listed:
  • Renbo Huang

    (School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Guirong Zhuo

    (School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Lu Xiong

    (School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Shouyi Lu

    (School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Wei Tian

    (School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Autonomous driving vehicles can effectively improve traffic conditions and promote the development of intelligent transportation systems. An autonomous vehicle can be divided into four parts: environment perception, motion prediction, motion planning, and motion control, among which the motion prediction module plays an essential role in the sustainability of autonomous driving vehicles. Vehicle motion prediction improves autonomous vehicles’ understanding of the surrounding dynamic environment, which reduces the uncertainty in the decision-making system and facilitates the implementation of an active braking system for autonomous vehicles. Currently, deep learning-based methods have become prevalent in this field as they can efficiently process complex scene information and achieve long-term prediction. These methods often follow a similar paradigm: encoding scene input to obtain the context feature, then decoding the context feature to output predictions. Recent research has proposed innovative improvement designs to enhance the primary paradigm. Thus, we review recent works based on their improvement designs and summarize them based on three criteria: scene input representation, context refinement, and prediction rationality improvement. Although most works focus on trajectory prediction, this paper also discusses new occupancy flow prediction methods. Additionally, this paper outlines commonly used datasets, evaluation metrics, and potential research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Renbo Huang & Guirong Zhuo & Lu Xiong & Shouyi Lu & Wei Tian, 2023. "A Review of Deep Learning-Based Vehicle Motion Prediction for Autonomous Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-43, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14716-:d:1257125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorit S. Hochbaum & David B. Shmoys, 1985. "A Best Possible Heuristic for the k -Center Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 180-184, May.
    2. Florin Leon & Marius Gavrilescu, 2021. "A Review of Tracking and Trajectory Prediction Methods for Autonomous Driving," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-37, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ziwei & Peng, Pai & Geng, Keke & Cheng, Xiaolong & Zhu, Xiaoyuan & Chen, Jiansong & Yin, Guodong, 2023. "Analysis of pedestrian crossing behavior based on Centralized Unscented Kalman Filter and pedestrian awareness based social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    2. Barbara Anthony & Vineet Goyal & Anupam Gupta & Viswanath Nagarajan, 2010. "A Plant Location Guide for the Unsure: Approximation Algorithms for Min-Max Location Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 79-101, February.
    3. Zhuqi Miao & Balabhaskar Balasundaram & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2014. "An exact algorithm for the maximum probabilistic clique problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 105-120, July.
    4. Andreea-Iulia Patachi & Florin Leon, 2023. "Multiagent Multimodal Trajectory Prediction in Urban Traffic Scenarios Using a Neural Network-Based Solution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Wei Ding & Ke Qiu, 2020. "Approximating the asymmetric p-center problem in parameterized complete digraphs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 21-35, July.
    6. Sergio Cabello, 2023. "Faster distance-based representative skyline and k-center along pareto front in the plane," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 441-466, June.
    7. Abdul Suleman, 2017. "On ill-conceived initialization in archetypal analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(4), pages 785-808, December.
    8. Randeep Bhatia & Sudipto Guha & Samir Khuller & Yoram J. Sussmann, 1998. "Facility Location with Dynamic Distance Functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 199-217, September.
    9. Yi Xu & Jigen Peng & Wencheng Wang & Binhai Zhu, 2018. "The connected disk covering problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 538-554, February.
    10. Viswanath Nagarajan & Baruch Schieber & Hadas Shachnai, 2020. "The Euclidean k -Supplier Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Gruia Călinescu & Xiaolang Wang, 2019. "Client assignment problems for latency minimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 889-900, April.
    12. Kobbi Nissim & Rann Smorodinsky & Moshe Tennenholtz, 2018. "Segmentation, Incentives, and Privacy," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1252-1268, November.
    13. Xuqing Bai & Hong Chang & Xueliang Li, 0. "More on limited packings in graphs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    14. Florin Leon & Mircea Hulea & Marius Gavrilescu, 2022. "Preface to the Special Issue on “Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Models, Optimization, and Machine Learning”," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-4, May.
    15. Raphael Kramer & Manuel Iori & Thibaut Vidal, 2020. "Mathematical Models and Search Algorithms for the Capacitated p -Center Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 444-460, April.
    16. Arindam Karmakar & Sandip Das & Subhas C. Nandy & Binay K. Bhattacharya, 2013. "Some variations on constrained minimum enclosing circle problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 176-190, February.
    17. Sándor P. Fekete & Joseph S. B. Mitchell & Karin Beurer, 2005. "On the Continuous Fermat-Weber Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 61-76, February.
    18. José Alejandro Cornejo Acosta & Jesús García Díaz & Ricardo Menchaca-Méndez & Rolando Menchaca-Méndez, 2020. "Solving the Capacitated Vertex K-Center Problem through the Minimum Capacitated Dominating Set Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Nicolas Dupin & Frank Nielsen & El-Ghazali Talbi, 2021. "Unified Polynomial Dynamic Programming Algorithms for P-Center Variants in a 2D Pareto Front," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, February.
    20. Dongyue Liang & Liquan Mei & James Willson & Wei Wang, 2016. "A simple greedy approximation algorithm for the minimum connected $$k$$ k -Center problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1417-1429, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14716-:d:1257125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.