IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i1p852-d1023639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Analysis on the Variances of Landslide Factors Using Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression in Penang Island, Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Syaidatul Azwani Zulkafli

    (Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia)

  • Nuriah Abd Majid

    (Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia)

  • Ruslan Rainis

    (Department of Geography, School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia)

Abstract

Landslides are one of the common natural disasters involving mostly movement of soil surfaces associated with gravitational attraction. Their adverse losses and significant damage, which always result in at least 17% of casualties and billions of dollars of financial losses worldwide, have made landslides the third most notorious phenomenon devastating many parts of the world. Malaysia has had multiple landslide occurrences, particularly in highly urbanized areas, such as Penang Island, owing to the declining vegetation cover in hilly terrains. Thus, this study aims to delineate the spatial relationship variances between landslide occurrences and the influencing factors in the area of interest. Ten influencing factors considered, including distance to roads, distance to rivers, distance to faults, slope angle, slope aspect, curvature, rainfall annual average, lithology, soil series, and land use. In this study, we use a software (GWR 4.0) as a medium for the analysis processing, coupled with GIS. A local statistical technique, Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression (GWLR), is primacy in capturing the geographical variation of the model coefficients that considers non-stationary variables and models their relationships, as well as processes regression coefficients over space. Goodness-of-fit criteria were used to evaluate the GWLR model, namely AICc that decrease from 872.202167 to 800.856998. Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) shows a decrease in value from 925.784185 to 945.196942. Likewise, deviance decreased from 849.931675 to 739.175630, while pdev increased from 0.379457 to 0.460321. These goodness-of-fit criteria values express GWLR as the best model for local measure. The variances in both local parameter estimates and the t -values (negative and positive values) show the level of significance for each landslide factor in influencing landslide occurrences across the study area. The results of the local parameter estimates and the t -values also show that the slope angle and the slope aspect spatially affect landslide occurrences across the study area. Therefore, a proper perspective and a thorough understanding of the certain slope condition must be established for future mitigation actions to support the agenda of SDG 15, which promotes resilience and disaster risk reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Syaidatul Azwani Zulkafli & Nuriah Abd Majid & Ruslan Rainis, 2023. "Spatial Analysis on the Variances of Landslide Factors Using Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression in Penang Island, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:852-:d:1023639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siti Norsakinah Selamat & Nuriah Abd Majid & Mohd Raihan Taha & Ashraf Osman, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Model Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Approach in Langat River Basin, Selangor, Malaysia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Sk Ajim Ali & Farhana Parvin & Quoc Bao Pham & Khaled Mohamed Khedher & Mahro Dehbozorgi & Yasin Wahid Rabby & Duong Tran Anh & Duc Hiep Nguyen, 2022. "An ensemble random forest tree with SVM, ANN, NBT, and LMT for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Rangit River watershed, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(3), pages 1601-1633, September.
    3. Rutilio Castro-Miguel & Gabriel Legorreta-Paulín & Roberto Bonifaz-Alfonzo & José Fernando Aceves-Quesada & Miguel Ángel Castillo-Santiago, 2022. "Modeling spatial landslide susceptibility in volcanic terrains through continuous neighborhood spatial analysis and multiple logistic regression in La Ciénega watershed, Nevado de Toluca, Mexico," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 767-788, August.
    4. Indrajit Chowdhuri & Subodh Chandra Pal & Rabin Chakrabortty & Sadhan Malik & Biswajit Das & Paramita Roy, 2021. "Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 697-722, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheela Bhuvanendran Bhagya & Anita Saji Sumi & Sankaran Balaji & Jean Homian Danumah & Romulus Costache & Ambujendran Rajaneesh & Ajayakumar Gokul & Chandini Padmanabhapanicker Chandrasenan & Renata P, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of a Part of the Western Ghats (India) Employing the AHP and F-AHP Models and Comparison with Existing Susceptibility Maps," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Li He & Xiantan Wu & Zhengwei He & Dongjian Xue & Fang Luo & Wenqian Bai & Guichuan Kang & Xin Chen & Yuxiang Zhang, 2023. "Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides in the Loess Plateau Based on Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Xining City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Qiang Liu & Aiping Tang & Ziyuan Huang & Lixin Sun & Xiaosheng Han, 2022. "Discussion on the tree-based machine learning model in the study of landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 887-911, September.
    4. Abhik Saha & Vasanta Govind Kumar Villuri & Ashutosh Bhardwaj, 2022. "Development and Assessment of GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Models Using ANN, Fuzzy-AHP, and MCDA in Darjeeling Himalayas, West Bengal, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Deborah Simon Mwakapesa & Yimin Mao & Xiaoji Lan & Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using DIvisive ANAlysis (DIANA) and RObust Clustering Using linKs (ROCK) Algorithms, and Comparison of Their Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Nabila Nurul Hawa & Sharifah Zarina Syed Zakaria & Muhammad Rizal Razman & Nuriah Abd Majid & Aizat Mohd Taib & Emrizal, 2023. "Element of Disaster Risk Reduction in Geography Education in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Francisco Parra & Jaime González & Max Chacón & Mauricio Marín, 2023. "Modeling and Evaluation of the Susceptibility to Landslide Events Using Machine Learning Algorithms in the Province of Chañaral, Atacama Region, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Xueling Wu & Junyang Wang, 2023. "Application of Bagging, Boosting and Stacking Ensemble and EasyEnsemble Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:852-:d:1023639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.