IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14382-d1251039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment of Demolition Tools Used in Townhouse Demolition: System Dynamics Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Bamisaye Mayowa

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Muang, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand)

  • Thanwadee Chinda

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Muang, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand)

Abstract

To accommodate population growth and migration to cities, many infrastructures have been demolished to build new residential units. Demolition processes cause various environmental problems globally and locally. The selection of methods used in demolition is crucial to reduce the long-term environmental impact. This study considers various combination tools used in townhouse demolition in Thailand, examines their environmental impacts, and suggests the combination of the tools to be used in the long term. The system dynamics (SD) modeling approach is utilized in this study to capture the changes in townhouse units, sizes, demolition tools, demolition time, and the work rates of tools and their effects on the environment. This approach has the capability to model complex relationships and examine long-term trends. Secondary data are employed to identify variables necessary for SD model development, such as the different sizes of townhouses in Thailand, the various types of demolition tools used in the construction industry, and environmental impacts from building demolition. The simulation results revealed that Combination 4, i.e., the use of demolition robots and hydraulic splitters, is the most effective combination to reduce the final impact percentage in the long term. Compared with the other three combinations, it generates the lowest CO 2eq emissions, energy consumption, noise, dust, and heat. If demolition robots are not yet available, Combination 1 (i.e., the use of excavators, jackhammers, and flame-cutters) offers the lowest environmental impact in the long term. This study provides guidelines for decision-makers in the construction industry to make sustainable choices of demolition tools and techniques used for townhouse demolition to reduce long-term environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bamisaye Mayowa & Thanwadee Chinda, 2023. "Environmental Assessment of Demolition Tools Used in Townhouse Demolition: System Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14382-:d:1251039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Fantozzi & Caterina Gargari & Massimo Rovai & Giacomo Salvadori, 2019. "Energy Upgrading of Residential Building Stock: Use of Life Cycle Cost Analysis to Assess Interventions on Social Housing in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Khozema Ahmed Ali & Mardiana Idayu Ahmad & Yusri Yusup, 2020. "Issues, Impacts, and Mitigations of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javed, Hasnain & Du, Jianguo & Iqbal, Shuja & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Basheer, Muhammad Farhan, 2024. "The impact of mineral resource abundance on environmental degradation in ten mineral- rich countries: Do the green innovation and financial technology matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Marika Pilou & George Kosmadakis & George Meramveliotakis, 2023. "Modeling of an Integrated Renewable-Energy-Based System for Heating, Cooling, and Electricity for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Georges Atallah & Faris Tarlochan, 2021. "Comparison between Variable and Constant Refrigerant Flow Air Conditioning Systems in Arid Climate: Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Energy Savings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Rita Remeikienė & Ligita Gasparėnienė & Aleksandra Fedajev & Marek Szarucki & Marija Đekić & Jolita Razumienė, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development Progress in EU Member States in the Context of Building Renovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    5. POPESCU Mara & STAICU Daniela, 2022. "Circular Economy And Religious Heritage Conservation: Adaptive Reuse Challenges," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 74(2), pages 40-48, September.
    6. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Wu, Haijiang & Wang, Yu, 2024. "Integrating green resources and mineral dependency to address the urban-rural divide in China's carbon neutrality transition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Enrico Sicignano & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Anna Stabile, 2019. "Quali—A Quantitative Environmental Assessment Method According to Italian CAM, for the Sustainable Design of Urban Neighbourhoods in Mediterranean Climatic Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Robert Dylewski & Janusz Adamczyk, 2023. "Economic and Ecological Optimization of Thermal Insulation Depending on the Pre-Set Temperature in a Dwelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Marcelle Engler Bridi & Joao Soliman-Junior & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Vanessa Gomes & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Yi Le & Sheng-Yang Huang, 2023. "Prediction of Urban Trees Planting Base on Guided Cellular Automata to Enhance the Connection of Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Xiaoyue Zhu & Bo Gao & Xudong Yang & Zhong Yu & Ji Ni, 2021. "Modifying Building Energy-Saving Design Based on Field Research into Climate Features and Local Residents’ Habits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Tomáš Mandičák & Peter Mésároš & Marcela Spišáková, 2021. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Sustainable Supply Chain and Cost Reducing of Waste Management in Slovak Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Shihong Zeng & Gen Li & Shaomin Wu & Zhanfeng Dong, 2022. "The Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the Context of Carbon Neutrality in China: Evidence from Spatial Spillover and Nonlinear Effect Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Manzan Marco & Atlas Ramezani & Alex Buoite Stella & Amedeo Pezzi, 2023. "Climate Change and Building Renovation: Effects on Energy Consumption and Internal Comfort in a Social Housing Building in Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    16. David Bossek & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2023. "Lifestyle-LCA: Challenges and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Ziyu Duan & Seiyong Kim, 2023. "Progress in Research on Net-Zero-Carbon Cities: A Literature Review and Knowledge Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    18. Shaojie Li & Tao Zhang & Xiaochen Liu & Xiaohua Liu, 2023. "A Battery Capacity Configuration Method of a Photovoltaic and Battery System Applied in a Building Complex for Increased Self-Sufficiency and Self-Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Giovanni Santi & Angelo Bertolazzi & Emanuele Leporelli & Umberto Turrini & Giorgio Croatto, 2020. "Green Systems Integrated to the Building Envelope: Strategies and Technical Solution for the Italian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Md Mehedi Hasan & Liling Cai & Xiaofen Ji & Francisca Margarita Ocran, 2022. "Eco-Friendly Clothing Market: A Study of Willingness to Purchase Organic Cotton Clothing in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14382-:d:1251039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.