IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14294-d1249205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Project Owner’s Behaviour of Addressing Sustainability in Project Assignment and Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Silvius

    (Institute for People & Business, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan 101, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Applied Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Ronald Ursem

    (Institute for People & Business, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan 101, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • José Magano

    (Research Center in Business and Economics (CICEE), Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Rua Sta. Marta 47, 5.º Andar, 1150-293 Lisbon, Portugal
    Higher Institute of Business Sciences and Tourism (ISCET), 4050-180 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The instrumental role of projects in the transition of organisations and society towards sustainability requires that the concepts of sustainability are considered in projects and project management. Within a project’s organisation, the project manager and the project owner bear the most responsibility for integrating sustainability into the execution, management, and governance of the project. The project owner is expected to translate the organisation’s commitment to sustainability into the assignment and governance of the project. However, several factors influence the behaviour of project owners, of which the organisation’s strategy is only one. Following the studies that explored the stimulus of project managers to consider or address sustainability, this study explored the factors that influence the project owner’s behaviour with regard to addressing sustainability in assigning and governing a project. A survey-based study with quantitative data analysis identified three factors that stimulate the project owners to address sustainability in assigning and governing projects: Organisational attitude, Private attitude, and Practical implementation. Of these factors, Practical implementation and Organisational attitude have the most influence. The importance of the Practical implementation factor highlights the need for practical, applicable tools and instruments that support the implementation of sustainability into projects and project management. The strong orientation on the organisational context may be explained by the managerial responsibility that project owners often have. The study contributes to the further understanding of how organisations can realise their transition to a sustainable enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Silvius & Ronald Ursem & José Magano, 2023. "Exploring the Project Owner’s Behaviour of Addressing Sustainability in Project Assignment and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14294-:d:1249205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, John, 2004. "Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 369-384, April.
    2. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Carl Marnewick & Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Exploring Patterns of Sustainability Stimuli of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Lundin, Rolf A. & Söderholm, Anders, 1995. "A theory of the temporary organization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 437-455, December.
    6. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    7. Stefano Armenia & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Fabio Nonino & Alessandro Pompei, 2019. "Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Marco Barneveld & Gilbert Silvius, 2022. "Exploring Variety in Factors That Stimulate Project Owners to Address Sustainability," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Gilbert Silvius, 2012. "Change the Game: Sustainability in Projects and Project Management," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 161-177, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruben van der Sluijs & Gilbert Silvius, 2023. "Exploring the Values of a Sustainable Project Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Raquel Castro Madureira & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Marlene Amorim & Marta Ferreira Dias & Bruno Lins & Gisela Mello, 2022. "Think Twice to Achieve a Sustainable Project Management: From Ecological Sustainability towards the Sustainable Project Management Cube Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Carl Marnewick & Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Exploring Patterns of Sustainability Stimuli of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    5. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    6. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    7. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Jana Hojnik & Mitja Ruzzier & Tatiana S. Manolova, 2020. "Sustainable development: Predictors of green consumerism in Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1695-1708, July.
    10. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Jinsoo Hwang & Jinkyung-Jenny Kim, 2021. "Edible Insects: How to Increase the Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Restaurant Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Jana Hojnik & Mitja Ruzzier & Maja Konečnik Ruzzier, 2019. "Transition towards Sustainability: Adoption of Eco-Products among Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-29, August.
    14. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Kareem Abdul Waheed & Abhilasha Singh & Ayisha Siddiqua & Maisa El Gamal & Mohammed Laeequddin, 2023. "E-Waste Recycling Behavior in the United Arab Emirates: Investigating the Roles of Environmental Consciousness, Cost, and Infrastructure Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    16. José Magano & Gilbert Silvius & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Ângela Leite, 2021. "Exploring Characteristics of Sustainability Stimulus Patterns of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Mashaal A. M. Saif & Nazimah Hussin & Maizaitulaidawati Md Husin & Ayed Alwadain & Ayon Chakraborty, 2022. "Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Digital-Only Banks in Malaysia: The Extension of Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, September.
    18. Passarelli, Mariacarmela & Bongiorno, Giuseppe & Cucino, Valentina & Cariola, Alfio, 2023. "Adopting new technologies during the crisis: An empirical analysis of agricultural sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    19. José Magano & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Micaela Martins, 2021. "Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Xie, Chengyang & Ding, Hongxing & Zhang, Huan & Yuan, Jingfeng & Su, Shu & Tang, Meiling, 2021. "Exploring the psychological mechanism underlying the relationship between organizational interventions and employees’ energy-saving behaviors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14294-:d:1249205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.