IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p14022-d1244899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Field Reserves in Emergencies as Assessed by Urban Residents and Refugees in Warsaw and Lviv during the War in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Maciejewska

    (Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Łukasz Kuzak

    (Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska

    (Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Yaryna Onufriv

    (Institute of Architecture and Design, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Land management in crises requires quick solutions, which, without proper knowledge and experience, can lead to harmful interventions in established cities. In this regard, when choosing areas for placing critical infrastructure, such as temporary residences for refugees or field hospitals, it is essential to take into account not only the existing experience of scientists and experts on the topic but also the opinions of those who are intended to benefit from these services and of the people who live nearby. The purpose of this study was to identify the needs and opinions regarding the placement of critical infrastructure and facilities for those forcibly displaced as a result of the war in Ukraine (based on the example of Lviv, Ukraine) and the effects on the residents of Warsaw (Poland) as a city that faced a powerful wave of migrants from Ukraine. In the summer of 2022, a survey of 81 internally displaced persons who lived in two modular towns in Lviv was conducted. During 2022–2023, the residents of Warsaw were surveyed concerning the essential criteria for emergency site locations and their attitudes toward refugees from Ukraine. The results of our research showed that for internally displaced persons in temporary shelters in Lviv, it was vital to provide for their basic needs, along with a sense of security, and to encourage the unity of the people living nearby. A significant result of the survey indicated the necessary yet undesirable infrastructure facilities within a radius of up to 1 km around residents’ homes. It was determined that the most important objects, which should be placed within the limits of pedestrian accessibility, were bomb shelters, medical institutions, centers for administrative services, and others. In return, the most undesirable infrastructure facilities were military facilities, burial sites, and memorial complexes, etc. The results of the Warsaw survey were related to the criteria for choosing sites for the placement of significant critical infrastructure facilities and also demonstrated the positive attitude of the citizens toward the immigrants from Ukraine and their readiness to help if needed. The results could serve as a solid basis for the selection of plots for constructing temporary accommodation for refugees and internally displaced persons in European cities during crisis events.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska & Yaryna Onufriv, 2023. "Use of Field Reserves in Emergencies as Assessed by Urban Residents and Refugees in Warsaw and Lviv during the War in Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:14022-:d:1244899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/14022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/14022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehereen Akhter & Sayed Mohammad Nazim Uddin & Nazifa Rafa & Sanjida Marium Hridi & Chad Staddon & Wayne Powell, 2020. "Drinking Water Security Challenges in Rohingya Refugee Camps of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Majewska, Anna & Denis, Małgorzata & Jarecka-Bidzińska, Ewa & Jaroszewicz, Joanna & Krupowicz, Wioleta, 2022. "Pandemic resilient cities: Possibilities of repairing Polish towns and cities during COVID-19 pandemic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Sattam Al Shogoor & Wahib Sahwan & Khaled Hazaymeh & Eman Almhadeen & Brigitta Schütt, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of the Influx of Syrian Refugees on Land Use/Land Cover Change in Irbid District, Northwestern Jordan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska & Kamil Moreau, 2022. "Land Management Using Land Reserves to Alleviate Emergencies on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Sylvester Mpandeli & Luxon Nhamo & Sithabile Hlahla & Dhesigen Naidoo & Stanley Liphadzi & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2020. "Migration under Climate Change in Southern Africa: A Nexus Planning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Jean-Claude Garcia-Zamor, 2017. "The Global Wave of Refugees and Migrants: Complex Challenges for European Policy Makers," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 581-594, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Sun & Shuting Chen & Ming Tian, 2024. "Retain in the City, Return Flow, or Blind Direction: A Study on the Differentiation Mechanism of Migrant Workers’ Migration Willingness under the Background of China’s Strategy for Integrated Urban–Ru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-30, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Ayyoob Sharifi & Richard Corkish & Sadiq M. Sait, 2022. "Role of Biogas in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Rohingya Refugee Camps in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Omolara Sanni & Bukola Salami & Folajinmi Oluwasina & Folakemi Ojo & Megan Kennedy, 2022. "Climate Change and African Migrant Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Phemelo Tamasiga & Helen Onyeaka & Adenike Akinsemolu & Malebogo Bakwena, 2023. "The Inter-Relationship between Climate Change, Inequality, Poverty and Food Security in Africa: A Bibliometric Review and Content Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-35, March.
    4. Omolola M. Adeola & Abel Ramoelo & Brian Mantlana & Oscar Mokotedi & Wongalethu Silwana & Philemon Tsele, 2022. "Review of Publications on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus and Climate Change Adaptation Using Bibliometric Analysis: A Case Study of Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska & Kamil Moreau, 2022. "Land Management Using Land Reserves to Alleviate Emergencies on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Nuhu Amin & Mahbubur Rahman & Mahbub-Ul Alam & Abul Kasham Shoab & Md. Kawsar Alome & Maksudul Amin & Tarique Md. Nurul Huda & Leanne Unicomb, 2021. "Field Trial of an Automated Batch Chlorinator System at Two Shared Shallow Tubewells among Camps for Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMN) in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Himangshu Dutta, 2023. "The Environmental Aspects of Refugee Crises: Insights from South Asia, Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 913-938, June.
    8. Bruno Venditto & Ndumba J. Kamwanyah & Christian H. Nekare, 2022. "Climate change, migration and urbanisation in contemporary Namibia," Working Papers 14, SITES.
    9. Mallik Akram Hossain & A. K. M. Ahsan Ullah & Md. Mohiuddin, 2023. "Rohingya refugees in the pandemic: Crisis and policy responses," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 183-191, February.
    10. Khadija Mitu & Nicola Jones & Joost Vintges & Megan Devonald, 2022. "Climate Risks and Truncated Opportunities: How Do Environmental Challenges Intersect with Economic and Social Disadvantages for Rohingya Adolescents in Bangladesh?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Miglė Zabielaitė-Skirmantė & Marija Burinskienė & Vida Maliene, 2023. "Influence of Revitalization on the Social and Economic Well-Being of Residents: Case Study of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Amirzadeh, Melika & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "The evolutionary path of place making: From late twentieth century to post-pandemic cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. ASG Faruque & Baharul Alam & Baitun Nahar & Irin Parvin & Ashok Kumar Barman & Soroar Hossain Khan & M Nasif Hossain & Yulia Widiati & ASM Mainul Hasan & Minjoon Kim & Martin Worth & Maya Vandenent & , 2022. "Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Practices and Outreach Services in Settlements for Rohingya Population in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, 2018–2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, August.
    14. S M Asik Ullah & Kazuo Asahiro & Masao Moriyama & Masakazu Tani, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status Changes of the Host Communities after the Rohingya Refugee Influx in the Southern Coastal Area of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:14022-:d:1244899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.