IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13738-d1240077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hyperledger Fabric-Based Tea Supply Chain Production Data Traceable Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Chin-Ling Chen

    (School of Information Engineering, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, China
    Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City 413310, Taiwan)

  • Wan-Bing Zhan

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Der-Chen Huang

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Ling-Chun Liu

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Yong-Yuan Deng

    (Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City 413310, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Guo Kuo

    (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 10610, Taiwan)

Abstract

With the advent of Industry 4.0, blockchain is one of the emerging technologies that can be used in multiple fields, especially in supply chain networks, where it is considered a sustainable concept technology. Because of its decentralization, reliability, transparency, consistency, and traceability, blockchain can challenge existing conventional models in supply chain scenarios. Therefore, this study proposes a framework that integrates the technology of Blockchain 3.0 (Hyperledger Fabric) into the tea supply chain. The concept of data traceability driven by blockchain technology consists of documenting the tea supply chain system, in which the cultivation, processing, and retailing of tea leaves are documented, and optimizing the existing anti-counterfeiting mechanisms. The ECDSA algorithm is used to confirm the identity among the entities located in the Hyperledger Fabric channel, and IPFS technology is introduced to store tea traceability data to solve the problem of data increment in the tea production process. Only the hash value and traceability code of the traceability data are stored in the block. We analyze the relationship between the number of transactions and latency, and we can see the latency time of both write and read transactions. The system tested write transactions and read transactions with a minimum write speed of 0.97 s and a maximum of 6.26 s and a minimum read speed of 0.1 s and a maximum of 4.62 s via Caliper analysis. The experimental results show that the performance analysis sounds good. This study uses distributed theory and service-oriented thinking in its specific application to the tea supply chain system model and takes each entity through a B2B connection to achieve anti-counterfeit traceability in the tea supply chain of a regulatory nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin-Ling Chen & Wan-Bing Zhan & Der-Chen Huang & Ling-Chun Liu & Yong-Yuan Deng & Chin-Guo Kuo, 2023. "Hyperledger Fabric-Based Tea Supply Chain Production Data Traceable Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13738-:d:1240077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Ahmet Çalık, 2022. "A conceptual framework for blockchain‐based sustainable supply chain and evaluating implementation barriers: A case of the tea supply chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3693-3716, December.
    2. Chang, Shuchih Ernest & Chen, Yi-Chian & Lu, Ming-Fang, 2019. "Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Jones, Stephen L. & Fawcett, Amydee M., 2012. "Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Liu Jiaguo & Zhang Huimin & Zhao Huida, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Investment and Sharing Strategy of Port Supply Chain Under Competitive Environment," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 280-309, June.
    5. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    6. Shuchih Ernest Chang & Hueimin Louis Luo & YiChian Chen, 2019. "Blockchain-Enabled Trade Finance Innovation: A Potential Paradigm Shift on Using Letter of Credit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Hu, Da-Chian & Ding, Li-Wen, 2017. "Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 143-153.
    8. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Kangning Zheng & Zuopeng Zhang & Jeffrey Gauthier, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Blockchain-based intelligent contract for factoring business in supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 777-797, January.
    10. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Cwiek, 2021. "Trust in the Diffusion of Professional Knowledge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 989-1009.
    11. Ji Jiang & Jin Chen, 2021. "Framework of Blockchain-Supported E-Commerce Platform for Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Zheng, Shiyuan & Jiang, Changmin, 2024. "Consortium blockchain in Shipping: Impacts on industry and social welfare," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Ojha, Divesh & Shockley, Jeff & Acharya, Chandan, 2016. "Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 212-227.
    15. Maxime Thomas & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2017. "Why is Business Model Innovation so poorly innovative ? Uncovering the critical role of collaborative design in Business Model Innovation," Post-Print hal-01499143, HAL.
    16. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Roubaud, David & Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Giannakis, Mihalis & Foropon, Cyril, 2019. "Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 120-136.
    17. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Summer K. Mohamed & Sandra Haddad & Mahmoud Barakat & Bojan Rosi, 2023. "Blockchain Technology Adoption for Improved Environmental Supply Chain Performance: The Mediation Effect of Supply Chain Resilience, Customer Integration, and Green Customer Information Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani & Horst Treiblmaier & Karim Rejeb, 2020. "Blockchain Technology in the Food Industry: A Review of Potentials, Challenges and Future Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Batwa, Abbas & Norrman, Andreas & Arvidsson, Ala, 2021. "How Blockchain interrelates with trust in the supply chain context: Insights from tracing sustainability in the metal industry," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 329-351, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13738-:d:1240077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.