IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13735-d1240066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Assessment of Insect Processing Technologies for Sustainable Insect Protein Production

Author

Listed:
  • María Cámara-Ruiz

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Alberto Sánchez-Venegas

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Nuria Blasco-Lavilla

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • M. Dolores Hernández

    (Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Medioambiental (IMIDA), Estación de Acuicultura Marina, San Pedro del Pinatar, 30740 Murcia, Spain)

  • Francisca Sánchez-Liarte

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • David Fernández-Gutiérrez

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Andrés J. Lara-Guillén

    (Technology Centre for Energy and the Environment (CETENMA), P.I. Cabezo Beaza, C/Sofía 6-13, 30353 Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

Considering the projected increase in demand for protein sources, finding alternative sources with lower environmental impacts has become of great importance. Insect mass production has emerged as a potential solution, particularly in Western countries. Previous studies indicate that insect farming together with insect processing stages are responsible for most of the environmental impacts associated with the final product. This study compares the environmental impacts linked to alternative processing technologies for insect protein production to traditional ones using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) following the Environmental Footprint methodology. The most relevant impact categories were identified as land use, energy use, freshwater ecotoxicity, water use and climate change. Among the processing treatments, FOP (freezing–oven drying–hot pressing) showed the best environmental performance in terms of all selected impact categories except water use, while the BOS (blanching–oven drying–SFE with CO 2 ) group had the highest environmental impacts in all categories. The results from this study indicate that the environmental impacts of insect protein production can be reduced by using alternative processing technologies. These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting processing technologies in order to align with global sustainability ambitions in the food industry. This study contributes to the development of ecologically responsible methods that can be adopted across protein production industries.

Suggested Citation

  • María Cámara-Ruiz & Alberto Sánchez-Venegas & Nuria Blasco-Lavilla & M. Dolores Hernández & Francisca Sánchez-Liarte & David Fernández-Gutiérrez & Andrés J. Lara-Guillén, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Insect Processing Technologies for Sustainable Insect Protein Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13735-:d:1240066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo A. Cadinu & Paolo Barra & Francesco Torre & Francesco Delogu & Fabio A. Madau, 2020. "Insect Rearing: Potential, Challenges, and Circularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana Reyes-Lúa & Julian Straus & Vidar T. Skjervold & Goran Durakovic & Tom Ståle Nordtvedt, 2021. "A Novel Concept for Sustainable Food Production Utilizing Low Temperature Industrial Surplus Heat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Lehmad, Manal & Hidra, Nawfal & Lhomme, Patrick & Mghazli, Safa & EL Hachimi, Youssef & Abdenouri, Naji, 2024. "Environmental, economic and quality assessment of hybrid solar-electric drying of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Daniela P. Rodrigues & Olga M. C. C. Ameixa & José Antonio Vázquez & Ricardo Calado, 2022. "Improving the Lipid Profile of Black Soldier Fly ( Hermetia illucens ) Larvae for Marine Aquafeeds: Current State of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Arnold L. Musungu & Beatrice W. Muriithi & Changeh J. Ghemoh & Dorothy Nakimbugwe & Chrysantus M. Tanga, 2023. "Production, consumption, and market supply of edible crickets: insights from East Africa," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Chloé Phan Van PhI & Maye Walraven & Marine Bézagu & Maxime Lefranc & Clément Ray, 2020. "Industrial Symbiosis in Insect Production—A Sustainable Eco-Efficient and Circular Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Antonio Franco & Carmen Scieuzo & Rosanna Salvia & Anna Maria Petrone & Elena Tafi & Antonio Moretta & Eric Schmitt & Patrizia Falabella, 2021. "Lipids from Hermetia illucens , an Innovative and Sustainable Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13735-:d:1240066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.