IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13019-d1228151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge of Energy Resources and Next Generation Energy Choice Behaviour: A Case Study of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Tetsuya Nakamura

    (Faculty of International Business Management, Kyoei University, Kasukabe 344-0051, Japan)

  • Atsushi Maruyama

    (Faculty of Horticulture Horticulture Economics, Chiba University, Matsudo 271-8510, Japan)

  • Satoru Masuda

    (Department of Economics and Management, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-0862, Japan)

  • Steven Lloyd

    (Faculty of International Business Management, Kyoei University, Kasukabe 344-0051, Japan)

  • Akifumi Kuchiki

    (Department of Liberal Arts, Open University, Chiba 253-0013, Japan)

Abstract

Renewable energy (RE) is key to averting the climate crisis, and public support is central to its successful implementation. In this study, we examined the impact that knowledge of energy policy and energy issues has on public support for different energy types. This was achieved through the use of an online survey of residents of Kazakhstan. As a resource-rich developing country with a history of nuclear testing, Kazakhstan provides an interesting case study. In this paper, we statistically analyze the effect of individual knowledge of energy policy on the choice behavior for next-generation energy, including RE, in Kazakhstan. First, those who support fossil fuel power generation knew that Kazakhstan has abundant natural gas reserves, and those who support wind and solar power generation were aware that Kazakhstan has huge potential for such forms of power generation. It was clear that knowledge of the positive and negative aspects of fossil fuel, nuclear, wind and solar power generation had an impact on the preferences of the respondents. Second, the reasons given for supporting RE included: unlike fossil fuels, there was no danger of them being exhausted; the rise in adoption of RE technology globally; reduction in carbon dioxide emissions; and, addressing climate change. Third, although many women were aware of the advantages and disadvantages of RE, there were high levels of both support and opposition. Respondents with lower income and lower educational attainment tended to oppose RE. People living in East Kazakhstan, the site of nuclear tests, tended to support RE, but due to the high rates of subsidy to the price of electricity, many people preferred the status quo. Finally, preference for next-generation energy in Kazakhstan was associated with higher awareness of the need to protect the global environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetsuya Nakamura & Atsushi Maruyama & Satoru Masuda & Steven Lloyd & Akifumi Kuchiki, 2023. "Knowledge of Energy Resources and Next Generation Energy Choice Behaviour: A Case Study of Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13019-:d:1228151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karatayev, Marat & Hall, Stephen & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Clarke, Michèle L., 2016. "Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: Policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 120-136.
    2. XU Jianzhong & Albina Assenova & Vasilii Erokhin, 2018. "Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development in a Resource-Abundant Country: Challenges of Wind Power Generation in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tetsuya Nakamura & Atsushi Maruyama & Satoru Masuda & Steven Lloyd, 2024. "The Impact of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine on Germany’s Energy Choice Attitudes among Residents in German States with Nuclear Power Plants in Commission or Decommissioned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-31, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Shadrina, 2020. "Non-Hydropower Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Assessment of Deployment Status and Analysis of Underlying Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Elena Vechkinzova & Yelena Petrenko & Yana S. Matkovskaya & Gaukhar Koshebayeva, 2021. "The Dilemma of Long-Term Development of the Electric Power Industry in Kazakhstan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Sung, Jinsok & Talipova, Amina & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Analyzing energy trade policy in Central Asia using the intercountry trade force approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 441-454.
    4. Murshed, Muntasir, 2019. "Trade Liberalization Policies and Renewable Energy Transition in Low and Middle-Income Countries? An Instrumental Variable Approach," MPRA Paper 97075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Galiya Movkebayeva & Aliya Aktymbayeva & Yuliya Tyurina & Nurken Baikadamov & Kamar Beketova & Marija Troyanskaya & Sholpan Smagulova & Aizhan Imangaliyeva, 2020. "Energy Security and Sustainability in Eurasian Economic Union in the Terms of Economic Growth: The Case of Kazakhstan s Energy Sector up to 2040 Perspectives," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 497-503.
    7. Timur Kogabayev & Anne Põder & Henrik Barth & Rando Värnik, 2023. "Prospects for Wood Pellet Production in Kazakhstan: A Case Study on Business Model Adjustment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Vusal Gasimli & Ramil Huseyn & Rashad Huseynov, 2024. "What Advantages Arise from the Shift Towards Sustainable Energy Sources in Resource-Rich Economies? Empirical Insights from Azerbaijan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 12-20, January.
    9. Kedar Mehta & Mathias Ehrenwirth & Christoph Trinkl & Wilfried Zörner & Rick Greenough, 2021. "The Energy Situation in Central Asia: A Comprehensive Energy Review Focusing on Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Tuan-Viet Hoang & Pouya Ifaei & Kijeon Nam & Jouan Rashidi & Soonho Hwangbo & Jong-Min Oh & ChangKyoo Yoo, 2018. "Optimal Management of a Hybrid Renewable Energy System Coupled with a Membrane Bioreactor Using Enviro-Economic and Power Pinch Analyses for Sustainable Climate Change Adaption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Oryani, Bahareh & Koo, Yoonmo & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Shafiee, Afsaneh, 2021. "Barriers to renewable energy technologies penetration: Perspective in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 971-983.
    13. Shirley Thompson, 2023. "Strategic Analysis of the Renewable Electricity Transition: Power to the World without Carbon Emissions?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-34, August.
    14. Todd, Iain & McCauley, Darren, 2021. "Assessing policy barriers to the energy transition in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Elżbieta Kacperska & Katarzyna Łukasiewicz & Piotr Pietrzak, 2021. "Use of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union and the Visegrad Group Countries—Results of Cluster Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Meiramkul Saiymova & Aliya Shakharova & Aliya Rakaeva & Madina Serikova & Aslan Tasmaganbetov & Yuliya Tyurina & Zhibek Bimagambetova, 2020. "Energy Security, Economics and Environment in the Eurasian Economic Union: Current and Future Scenarios," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 293-299.
    17. Igor Makarov, 2022. "Does resource abundance require special approaches to climate policies? The case of Russia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Dongmyoung Kim & Taesu Jeon & Insu Paek & Daeyoung Kim, 2022. "A Study on Available Power Estimation Algorithm and Its Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Zheng-Xia He & Shi-Chun Xu & Qin-Bin Li & Bin Zhao, 2018. "Factors That Influence Renewable Energy Technological Innovation in China: A Dynamic Panel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, January.
    20. Mouraviev, Nikolai, 2021. "Energy security in Kazakhstan: The consumers’ perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13019-:d:1228151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.