IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12761-d1223324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Simulations and Wind Tunnel Experiments to Optimize the Parameters of the Second Sand Fence and Prevent Sand Accumulation on the Subgrade of a Desert Railway

Author

Listed:
  • Guowei Xin

    (School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jie Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, Ministry of Education of China, Lanzhou 730000, China
    School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Liqiang Fan

    (China Railway Urumqi Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830000, China)

  • Bin Deng

    (China Railway Urumqi Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830000, China)

  • Wenjie Bu

    (China Railway Urumqi Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830000, China)

Abstract

Wind-blown sand significantly affects the construction and safe operation of railways in desert regions. The performance of a wind-blown-sand prevention system with different structural parameters and sand accumulation around the railway subgrade was analyzed in this study. The optimum porosity and opening type of a second sand fence were assessed via wind tunnel experiments and numerical simulations. The results showed that the subgrade intercepted some sand and reduced sand accumulation on the track surface, and the interception rate was 29.70%. The wind-blown-sand prevention efficiency of the subgrade was 88.55%. Moreover, the lower the porosity of the second sand fence, the lower the sand velocity on the windward side and the higher the sand accumulation. The porosities of the first and second sand fences should be 30% and 20%, respectively, to maximize the sand accumulation between the fences. When the second sand fence had horizontal openings, most of the sand accumulated near the surface (within 20 cm) on the leeward side and on the straw checkerboard barrier, and the maximum wind-blown-sand prevention efficiency was 97.16%. When the second sand fence had vertical openings, the efficiency was 93.60%, and the sand accumulation on the leeward side and the straw checkerboard barrier was reduced. As the fence height increased (above 20 cm), the sand prevention efficiency of both approaches increased. The research results can provide guidance for the formulation and optimization of sand prevention measures for railways and highways in deserts.

Suggested Citation

  • Guowei Xin & Jie Zhang & Liqiang Fan & Bin Deng & Wenjie Bu, 2023. "Numerical Simulations and Wind Tunnel Experiments to Optimize the Parameters of the Second Sand Fence and Prevent Sand Accumulation on the Subgrade of a Desert Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12761-:d:1223324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Xiaonong & Fang, Genshen & Yang, Jiayu & Zhao, Lin & Ge, Yaojun, 2023. "Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiangang Xu & Ning Huang & Jie Zhang & Xiaoan Zhang & Guangtian Shi & Xuanmin Li, 2024. "Influence of Terrain on Windblown Sand Flow Field Characteristics around Railway Culverts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Zhen & You, Xianhui, 2024. "Life cycle carbon footprint accounting of an offshore wind farm in Southeast China—Simplified models and carbon benchmarks for typhoons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Xianxiong Zhang & Zhuozhang Deng & Genshen Fang & Yaojun Ge, 2022. "Theoretical Analysis of Ultimate Main Span Length for Arch Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Mathpati, Yogesh Chandrakant & More, Kalpesh Sanjay & Tripura, Tapas & Nayek, Rajdip & Chakraborty, Souvik, 2023. "MAntRA: A framework for model agnostic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Mendoza-Lugo, Miguel Angel & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2024. "Mapping hazardous locations on a road network due to extreme gross vehicle weights," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Jain, Tanmay & Verma, Kusum, 2024. "Reliability based computational model for stochastic unit commitment of a bulk power system integrated with volatile wind power," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Qiao, Yidan & Gao, Xinwei & Ma, Lin & Chen, Dengkai, 2024. "Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    7. Wang, Shaochen & Tian, Wende & Li, Chuankun & Cui, Zhe & Liu, Bin, 2023. "Mechanism-based deep learning for tray efficiency soft-sensing in distillation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Dai, Wei & Quek, Zhi Hao & Low, Kin Huat, 2024. "Probabilistic modeling and reasoning of conflict detection effectiveness by tracking systems towards safe urban air mobility operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12761-:d:1223324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.