IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12606-d1221152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability Assessment and Optimization Countermeasures of the Human–Land Coupling System of the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyuan Wang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resource and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Hao Cheng

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Fujia Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Dashtseren Avirmed

    (Institute of Geography and Geo-ecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 15170, Mongolia)

  • Bair Tsydypov

    (Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude 670047, Russia)

  • Menghan Zhang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resource and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the conflicts of the human–land coupling system (HLS) in the cross-border transportation corridor areas have become increasingly severe, especially in the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor (CMRTC). The vulnerability assessment of the HLS-CMRTC is the key scientific issue for regional sustainable development. Based on the nearly 20 years of a scientific expedition, we set the CMRTC as the study area, constructed the vulnerability assessment index system and quantitative model, assessed the vulnerability of the HLS-CMRTC, revealed the key influencing factors, divided vulnerability risk prevention zones, and proposed the targeted optimization countermeasures. This study found that: (1) The overall vulnerability pattern of the HLS-CMRTC showed a vulnerability level gradually increasing from south to north. (2) Permafrost instability risk, land desertification, temperature increase, and backward social development were key influences. (3) Vulnerability risk prevention zones were divided into four priority and two general zones. The targeted optimization countermeasures were proposed, such as establishing an ecological security barrier, carrying out collaborative ecological risk monitoring, and early warning. The conclusions could provide a decision-making basis for the study area to reduce the vulnerability of the HLS. They could also provide reference and scientific support for achieving sustainable development of the economy and environment in similar regions of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyuan Wang & Hao Cheng & Fujia Li & Dashtseren Avirmed & Bair Tsydypov & Menghan Zhang, 2023. "Vulnerability Assessment and Optimization Countermeasures of the Human–Land Coupling System of the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12606-:d:1221152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanlong Gu & Chongyang Huan & Fengjiao Yang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecological Vulnerability and Its Influencing Factors in Shenyang City of China: Based on SRP Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Dong Li & Chongyang Huan & Jun Yang & Hanlong Gu, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Distribution Changes, Driving Force Analysis and Simulation Prediction of Ecological Vulnerability in Liaoning Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Yue Chen & Kangning Xiong & Xiaodong Ren & Cai Cheng, 2021. "Vulnerability Comparison between Karst and Non-Karst Nature Reserves—With a Special Reference to Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Fujia Li & Anna Mikheeva & Suocheng Dong, 2021. "Socio-Economic Factor Impact on the Republic of Buryatia (Russia) Green Economic Development Transition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Borisovna Lubsanova & Lyudmila Bato-Zhargalovna Maksanova & Zinaida Sergeevna Eremko & Taisiya Borisovna Bardakhanova & Anna Semenovna Mikheeva, 2022. "The Eco-Efficiency of Russian Regions in North Asia: Their Green Direction of Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva & Taisiya Bardakhanova & Svetlana Ayusheeva & Fujia Li & Suocheng Dong, 2022. "Green Economy Development Progress in the Republic of Buryatia (Russia)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Menghua Deng & Junfei Chen & Feifei Tao & Jiulong Zhu & Min Wang, 2022. "On the Coupling and Coordination Development between Environment and Economy: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Kangwen Zhu & Dan Song & Lanxin Zhang & Yong He & Sheng Zhang & Yaqun Liu & Xiaosong Tian, 2023. "Evolving Trends and Influencing Factors of the Rural Green Development Level in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Veronika Yu. Zemzyulina & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya & Ilia M. Chernenko, 2023. "The Impact of Sustainable Development and Reliability on the Performance of Russian Enterprises in the Context of an Economic Fragmentation," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(4), pages 1056-1086.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12606-:d:1221152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.