IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12267-d1215134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical Review of Research to Date on Competences 4.0—What Do We Know about Competences in Industry 4.0? A Status Quo Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Paweł Poszytek

    (WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Monika Hyrcza-Michalska

    (Department of Material Technologies, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Katowice, Poland)

  • Jarosław Brodny

    (Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Paweł Wawrzała

    (Department of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Przemysław Gębal

    (Institute of Applied Linguistics, University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Joanna Lisok

    (Department of Industrial Informatics, Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Katowice, Poland)

  • Joanna Kruszewska

    (Department of Economy and Informatics, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Aldis G. Sigurðardóttir

    (Department of Business Administration, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Michaela Bugnova

    (Department of Flight Preparation, Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, 40-200 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Małgorzata Dobrowolska

    (Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

Abstract

This article analyses competences 4.0 models created in the context of the concept of Industry 4.0. A literature review and bibliometric analyses were used to show the semantic shift of this concept over time. The results show that the 4.0 competences created in the context of Industry 4.0 assume that the skills they represent are needed in the labor market. Moreover, in most cases, analyses of competences 4.0 are carried out considering separate perspectives by researchers representing different scientific disciplines. Refining and fine-tuning a universal and detailed model of competences 4.0 is strongly recommended to bridge the gap between other scientific disciplines. Furthermore, this article presents competences 4.0 from a much broader perspective, including linguistic competences that stem from the wider domain of the ability to communicate within social competences. Linguistic competences are also interrelated with some aspects of cognitive competences. This approach makes this study completely novel and aims to present the most comprehensive and universal 4.0 model to date.

Suggested Citation

  • Paweł Poszytek & Monika Hyrcza-Michalska & Jarosław Brodny & Paweł Wawrzała & Przemysław Gębal & Joanna Lisok & Joanna Kruszewska & Aldis G. Sigurðardóttir & Michaela Bugnova & Małgorzata Dobrowolska, 2023. "Theoretical Review of Research to Date on Competences 4.0—What Do We Know about Competences in Industry 4.0? A Status Quo Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12267-:d:1215134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12267/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12267/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena M. Stuss & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Zbigniew J. Makieła, 2019. "Competences of Graduates of Higher Education Business Studies in Labor Market I (Results of Pilot Cross-Border Research Project in Poland and Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Piotr Bartkowiak, 2022. "Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Zdzislawa Dacko-Pikiewicz & Jacek Wodz & Karolina Walancik-Ryba & Wojciech Pikiewicz, 2021. "Remote Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 112-126.
    3. Malgorzata Markowska & Danuta Strahl & Andrzej Sokolowski, 2021. "Dynamic Cluster Analysis of Educated and Smart Society Development in European Union Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 52-64.
    4. Zbigniew J. Makieła & Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Mariusz Raczek & Krzysztof Wrana & Janusz Michałek, 2022. "Tools for Network Smart City Management—The Case Study of Potential Possibility of Managing Energy and Associated Emissions in Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2021. "Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Sustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Ireneusz Nowak & Katarzyna Szczepanska-Woszczyna & Arkadiusz Letkiewicz & Iwona Klonowska, 2021. "Air Force NCOs Competency Profile in the Future Operational Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 457-468.
    7. Magdalena M. Stuss & Zbigniew J. Makieła & Izabela Stańczyk, 2020. "Role of Competences of Graduates in Building Innovations via Knowledge Transfer in the Part of Carpathian Euroregion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Mirosław Jarosiński & Miklós Kozma & Jurgita Sekliuckiene, 2021. "Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Methods of Cross-Cultural Learning in an International Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Henryk Dzwigol, 2022. "Comparing Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches in Management Sciences Research," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 5(4), pages 27-49, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12267-:d:1215134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.