IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11752-d1206697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing R&D Performance Management: A Case of R&D Projects in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Kiwon Lee

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea)

  • Suchul Lee

    (Department of Business Administration, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study introduces a comprehensive system designed to monitor and manage the performance of research and development (R&D) projects. The proposed system offers project managers a systematic methodology to enhance the efficiency of R&D performance management. To achieve this, the system categorizes R&D performance indicators based on their feasibility of measurement and the frequency of output generated during R&D activities. The progress rate of each indicator is then represented in terms of observable and latent progress, considering the unique characteristics of each indicator. The calculation methods vary depending on the classification of the indicator. Additionally, a progress priority matrix is developed to aid decision-making by evaluating the current progress and rate of progress increment of the indicators. This matrix enables project managers to prioritize tasks effectively. To assess the validity and usefulness of the proposed system, it is applied to a real case of large-scale R&D projects conducted at a Korean research institute. Interviews with project managers validate that the proposed system surpasses the effectiveness of the legacy system in monitoring R&D progress. Through its comprehensive framework and practical application, this study contributes to the enhancement of R&D project performance monitoring, providing valuable insights for project managers seeking to optimize their R&D management processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiwon Lee & Suchul Lee, 2023. "Enhancing R&D Performance Management: A Case of R&D Projects in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11752-:d:1206697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junwen Luo & Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros & Stefan Kuhlmann, 2019. "The balancing role of evaluation mechanisms in organizational governance—The case of publicly funded research institutions," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 344-354.
    2. Kim, Bowon & Oh, Heungshik, 2002. "An effective R&D performance measurement system: survey of Korean R&D researchers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 19-31, February.
    3. Komal Khalid & Samina Nawab, 2018. "Employee Participation and Employee Retention in View of Compensation," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    4. Eva Benková & Peter Gallo & Beáta Balogová & Jozef Nemec, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Use of Balanced Scorecard in Measuring Company Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Coluccia, Daniela & Dabić, Marina & Del Giudice, Manlio & Fontana, Stefano & Solimene, Silvia, 2020. "R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 259-271.
    6. Bae, Sung Joo & Lee, Hyeonsuh, 2020. "The role of government in fostering collaborative R&D projects: Empirical evidence from South Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kelley, Maryellen R., 2006. "The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1509-1521, December.
    8. Ying Yang, 2023. "Sustainability Analysis of Enterprise Performance Management Driven by Big Data and Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Pearson, AW, 1990. "Planning and control in research and development," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 573-581.
    10. Nishimura, Junichi & Okamuro, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Internal and external discipline: The effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 840-853.
    11. Vittorio Chiesa & Federico Frattini & Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini, 2009. "An Exploratory Study On R&D Performance Measurement Practices: A Survey Of Italian R&D-Intensive Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 65-104.
    12. Eunseong Cho & Mushin Lee, 2005. "An exploratory study on contingency factors affecting R&D performance measurement," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(6), pages 502-512, September.
    13. Lee, Mushin & Son, Byoungho & Om, Kiyong, 1996. "Evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 805-818, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schönefeld, Carsten & Möller, Klaus & Engelhardt, Philipp, 2015. "Erfolgstreiber Innovationskennzahlen," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(3), pages 322-350.
    2. Deng, Kebin & Ding, Zhong & Liao, Xiaojie & Zhu, Yushu, 2021. "Staged subsidies and corporate investments: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Song, Yang & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Tian, Yifan & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Bae, Sung Joo & Lee, Hyeonsuh, 2020. "The role of government in fostering collaborative R&D projects: Empirical evidence from South Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. M. Lee & K. Om & J. Koh, 1999. "Blind review of research proposals in Korea: Its effectiveness and factors affecting applicant detection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(1), pages 17-31, May.
    6. Davcik, Nebojsa S. & Cardinali, Silvio & Sharma, Piyush & Cedrola, Elena, 2021. "Exploring the role of international R&D activities in the impact of technological and marketing capabilities on SMEs’ performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 650-660.
    7. Banal-Estañol, Albert & Duso, Tomaso & Seldeslachts, Jo & Szücs, Florian, 2022. "R&D Spillovers through RJV Cooperation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 1-10.
    8. Bongsuk Sung & Myoung Shik Choi & Woo-Yong Song, 2019. "Exploring the Effects of Government Policies on Economic Performance: Evidence Using Panel Data for Korean Renewable Energy Technology Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Mohammed R. AlShareef & Ibrahim A. Alrammah & Nasser A. Alshoukani & Abdulaziz M. Almalik, 2023. "The impact of financial incentives on research production: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 3067-3089, May.
    10. George A Shinkle & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2019. "Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 248-281, May.
    11. Su, Zhong-qin & Xiao, Zuoping & Yu, Lin, 2019. "Do political connections enhance or impede corporate innovation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 94-110.
    12. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    13. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    14. Hans Pohl, 2021. "Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1329-1358, February.
    15. Yu, Lin & Liu, Xiaoquan & Fung, Hung-Gay & Leung, Wai Kin, 2020. "Size and value effects in high-tech industries: The role of R&D investment," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Fu, Shuke & Ge, Yingchen & Hao, Yu & Peng, Jiachao & Tian, Jiali, 2024. "Energy supply chain efficiency in the digital era: Evidence from China's listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Tania Babina & Sabrina T. Howell, 2018. "Entrepreneurial Spillovers from Corporate R&D," NBER Working Papers 25360, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Berger, Marius & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2021. "Start-up subsidies and the sources of venture capital," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    19. Gibson, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U. & Dabic, Marina, 2019. "Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 181-202.
    20. Wu, Aihua, 2017. "The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 339-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11752-:d:1206697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.