IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11592-d1203788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Attitudes and Acceptability toward Edible New Zealand Native Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Damir D. Torrico

    (Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

  • Xin Nie

    (Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

  • Damselina Lukito

    (Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

  • Santanu Deb-Choudhury

    (AgResearch Limited, Smart Foods & Bioproducts, AgResearch Lincoln, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand)

  • Scott C. Hutchings

    (AgResearch Limited, Te Ohu Rangahau Kai, Massey University Campus, Grasslands, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Carolina E. Realini

    (AgResearch Limited, Te Ohu Rangahau Kai, Massey University Campus, Grasslands, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate consumers’ perceptions, emotions, and acceptability of selected edible New Zealand native plants. A survey-type methodology was employed, recruiting participants voluntarily through email invitations. A total of N = 100 participants, ranging in age from 18 to 70 and with diverse ethnic backgrounds, were asked to answer questions regarding six specific edible New Zealand species and edible native plants in general. Results showed that participants had varying levels of familiarity with the specific plants, with a majority feeling “calm”, “happy”, and “interested” when presented with them. Factors deemed most important when thinking about the six selected plants included edibility and safety. When considering native plants in general, participants rated factors such as general nutrition, safety, and sustainability as important. The study found that a significant proportion of participants expressed a positive intention to consume native plants in the future, but the levels of interest varied depending on the demographic distribution. The study provides insights into consumer attitudes toward edible native plants and highlights the potential for these food ingredients to be included in mainstream diets.

Suggested Citation

  • Damir D. Torrico & Xin Nie & Damselina Lukito & Santanu Deb-Choudhury & Scott C. Hutchings & Carolina E. Realini, 2023. "Consumer Attitudes and Acceptability toward Edible New Zealand Native Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11592-:d:1203788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Thornton & Pierre Gerber, 2010. "Climate change and the growth of the livestock sector in developing countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 169-184, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal, 2021. "Impact of climate change on pastoralists’ resilience and sustainable mitigation in Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11406-11426, August.
    2. Joseph K. Gwaka & Marcy A. Demafo & Joel-Pascal N. N’konzi & Anton Pak & Jamiu Olumoh & Faiz Elfaki & Oyelola A. Adegboye, 2023. "Machine-Learning Approach for Risk Estimation and Risk Prediction of the Effect of Climate on Bovine Respiratory Disease," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Prasun K. Gangopadhyay & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Paresh B. Shirsath & Pramod K. Aggarwal, 2019. "Spatial targeting of ICT-based weather and agro-advisory services for climate risk management in agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 241-256, May.
    4. Mudombi, Grace, 2011. "Factors Affecting Perceptions and Responsiveness to Climate Variability Induced Hazards," Research Theses 198517, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    5. Grzegorz Nawalany & Paweł Sokołowski, 2022. "Interaction between a Cyclically Heated Building and the Ground, for Selected Locations in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Cantarello, Elena & Newton, Adrian C. & Hill, Ross A. & Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia & Williams-Linera, Guadalupe & López-Barrera, Fabiola & Manson, Robert H. & Golicher, Duncan J., 2011. "Simulating the potential for ecological restoration of dryland forests in Mexico under different disturbance regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1112-1128.
    7. Tshepiso Mangani & Hendri Coetzee & Klaus Kellner & George Chirima, 2020. "Socio-Economic Benefits Stemming from Bush Clearing and Restoration Projects Conducted in the D’Nyala Nature Reserve and Shongoane Village, Lephalale, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Imran Hussain & Abdul Rehman, 2022. "How CO2 emission interacts with livestock production for environmental sustainability? evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8545-8565, June.
    9. Guo Ruo & Brhane Weldegebrial & Genet Yohannes & Gebremedhin Yohannes, 2018. "Climate Change Adaptation Practices by Ruminant Livestock Producer of in Hintalo Wajerat District Tigray Regional State, Northern Ethiopia," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 11(5), pages 8809-8828, December.
    10. Mensah, Charles & Enahoro, Dolapo, 2022. "Modeling poultry and maize sector interactions in Southern Africa under a changing climate," SocArXiv ehd3j, Center for Open Science.
    11. McCarl, Bruce A. & Attavanich, Witsanu & Musumba, Mark & Mu, Jianhong E. & Aisabokhae, Ruth, 2011. "Land Use and Climate Change," MPRA Paper 83993, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    12. Mudombi, Grace, 2011. "Factors affecting perceptions and responsiveness to climate variability induced hazards," Research Theses 157508, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Bizimana, Jean-Claude & Bessler, David A. & Angerer, Jay P., 2016. "The 2010-2011 Drought Impacts on Cattle Market Integration in the Horn of Africa: A preliminary Evaluation using VAR and Structural Break Analysis," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229991, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Nyanjige Mbembela Mayala & Mangasini Atanasi Katundu & Elibariki Emmanuel Msuya, 2019. "Socio-cultural Factors influencing livestock investment decisions among Smallholder Farmers in Mbulu and Bariadi Districts, Tanzania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1214-1230, October.
    15. Haining Liu & Hong Wang & Xiaobing Li & Tengfei Qu & Yao Zhang & Yuting Lu & Yalei Yang & Jiahao Liu & Xili Zhao & Jingru Su & Dingsheng Luo, 2023. "Identification of Constructive Species and Degraded Plant Species in the Temperate Typical Grassland of Inner Mongolia Based on Hyperspectral Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Abdullahi, Abdulazeez & Olatunji , O. I & Bako, Ramatu Usman, 2024. "Climate Change and Small Scale Poultry Production in Selected Local Governmentareas of Kwara State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(12), pages 765-779, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11592-:d:1203788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.