IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11567-d1203201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal and Tax Policies, Access to External Financing and Green Innovation Efficiency: An Evaluation of Chinese Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Xu

    (International Education College, Hebei Finance University, Baoding 071051, China
    Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Chee-Pung Ng

    (Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Toong Hai Sam

    (Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Asokan Vasudevan

    (Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Poh Kiong Tee

    (School of Marketing and Management, Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation, Technology Park Malaysia Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Alex Hou Hong Ng

    (Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Wong Chee Hoo

    (Faculty of Business and Communications (FBC), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

Abstract

China has placed significant importance on the development of a circular economy and achievement of sustainable prosperity. It employs multiple fiscal and tax policies to facilitate clean production and improve resource efficiency by fostering corporate green innovation. Policy signalling boosts companies’ external funding, including debt and equity. As such, this research focuses on how government subsidies and tax incentives influence corporate green innovation efficiency, accounting for the mediating roles of debt financing and equity financing. Under the SBM model, we utilise the Luenberger index to quantify green innovation efficiency. In addition, the fixed-effect regression with 19,228 firm-year observations from 3549 firms between 2015 and 2021 is used. Based on empirical findings, government subsidies reduce green innovation efficiency, while tax incentives increase it. In addition, debt financing mediates the association between tax incentives and corporate green innovation efficiency. Furthermore, government subsidies and tax incentives play more significant roles in non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) and for businesses in growing and mature stages than other listed firms. To improve access to external financing and green innovation efficiency, it is suggested that the government implement various government subsidies or tax incentives according to business characteristics, with each company applying policies customised to its specific circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Xu & Chee-Pung Ng & Toong Hai Sam & Asokan Vasudevan & Poh Kiong Tee & Alex Hou Hong Ng & Wong Chee Hoo, 2023. "Fiscal and Tax Policies, Access to External Financing and Green Innovation Efficiency: An Evaluation of Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11567-:d:1203201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Kraft, Kornelius, 2009. "Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 372-383, August.
    2. Ann Ling-Ching Chan, 2012. "Innovation activity and corporate financing: evidence from a developing economy," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(20), pages 1665-1678, October.
    3. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    4. Islam, Mazhar & Fremeth, Adam & Marcus, Alfred, 2018. "Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 35-51.
    5. Du, Jun & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2016. "Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: Being young, small or private in China," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 22-38.
    6. Zhou, Bole & Zhao, Shouguo, 2022. "Industrial policy and corporate investment efficiency," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Zhenji Jin & Yue Shang & Jian Xu, 2018. "The Impact of Government Subsidies on Private R&D and Firm Performance: Does Ownership Matter in China’s Manufacturing Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Aistleitner, Matthias & Gräbner, Claudius & Hornykewycz, Anna, 2021. "Theory and empirics of capability accumulation: Implications for macroeconomic modeling," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    9. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:5:p:2059-2086 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Faff, Robert & Kwok, Wing Chun & Podolski, Edward J. & Wong, George, 2016. "Do corporate policies follow a life-cycle?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 95-107.
    11. Catherine Casamatta, 2003. "Financing and Advising: Optimal Financial Contracts with Venture Capitalists," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(5), pages 2059-2085, October.
    12. Seng Ratny & M. M. Fonseka & Gao-Liang Tian, 2019. "Access To External Financing And Firm Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 53(2), pages 109-122, April-Jun.
    13. Kleer, Robin, 2010. "Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1361-1374, December.
    14. Kirsten A. Cook & Andrea M. Romi & Daniela Sánchez & Juan Manuel Sánchez, 2019. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3-4), pages 494-537, March.
    15. Areti Gkypali & Kostas Tsekouras, 2015. "Productive performance based on R&D activities of low-tech firms: an antecedent of the decision to export?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 801-828, November.
    16. Özçelik, Emre & Taymaz, Erol, 2008. "R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 258-275, March.
    17. Bianchi, Mattia & Murtinu, Samuele & Scalera, Vittoria G., 2019. "R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    18. Hua Feng & Fengyan Wang & Guomin Song & Lanlan Liu, 2022. "Digital Transformation on Enterprise Green Innovation: Effect and Transmission Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-31, August.
    19. Xiaolong Gao & Changfei Li & Ehsan Elahi & Mohammad Ilyas Abro & Zhaocai Cui, 2023. "Technological Innovation, Product Quality and Upgrading of Manufacturing Value Chain: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    21. Thomas Hellmann & Manju Puri, 2002. "Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start‐Up Firms: Empirical Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 169-197, February.
    22. Wang, Lanfang & Wang, Yue & Zhou, Jing, 2022. "Political connection,government R&D subsidies and innovation efficiency: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    23. Chen, Yu & Wang, Yuandi & Hu, Die & Zhou, Zhao, 2020. "Government R&D subsidies, information asymmetry, and the role of foreign investors: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment on the shanghai-hong kong stock connect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    24. Nishimura, Junichi & Okamuro, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Internal and external discipline: The effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 840-853.
    25. Yao, Shouyu & Pan, Yuying & Sensoy, Ahmet & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    26. Liang Li & Hajar Msaad & Huaping Sun & Mei Xuen Tan & Yeqing Lu & Antonio K.W. Lau, 2020. "Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: New Evidence from Energy Intensive Industry in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    27. Bilal Ahmed & Minhas Akbar & Tanazza Sabahat & Saqib Ali & Ammar Hussain & Ahsan Akbar & Xie Hongming, 2020. "Does Firm Life Cycle Impact Corporate Investment Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    28. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    29. Lu, Hongyou & Liu, Min & Song, Wenjing, 2022. "Place-based policies, government intervention, and regional innovation: Evidence from China's Resource-Exhausted City program," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    30. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    31. Hanyuan Liang & Guangliang Li & Weikun Zhang & Zhe Chen, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Performance: The Regulatory Role of Government Grants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    32. Zhiyu Fang & Ling Jiang & Zhong Fang, 2021. "Does Economic Policy Intervention Inhibit the Efficiency of China’s Green Energy Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    33. Tian, Binbin & Yu, Baixue & Chen, Shi & Ye, Jingjing, 2020. "Tax incentive, R&D investment and firm innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    34. Dimos, Christos & Pugh, Geoff, 2016. "The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 797-815.
    35. Qizhi Tao & Yicheng Sun & Yingjun Zhu & Xiaolin Yang, 2017. "Political Connections and Government Subsidies: Evidence from Financially Distressed Firms in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 1854-1868, August.
    36. Gatchev, Vladimir A. & Spindt, Paul A. & Tarhan, Vefa, 2009. "How do firms finance their investments?: The relative importance of equity issuance and debt contracting costs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 179-195, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangwei Zhang & Yahan Shi & Nuozhou Huang, 2024. "Government Subsidies, Green Innovation, and Firm Total Factor Productivity of Listed Artificial Intelligence Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Hui-Lin Zhu & Ke-Zhi Yang, 2024. "The Spillover Effect of ESG Performance on Green Innovation—Evidence from Listed Companies in China A-Shares," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhongcheng & Li, Xinyue & Xue, Xinhong & Liu, Yahuan, 2022. "More government subsidies, more green innovation? The evidence from Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 11-21.
    2. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2012. "Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, July.
    3. He Xiao, 2023. "Institutional investors' corporate site visits and corporate investment efficiency," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 359-392, June.
    4. Berger, Marius & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2021. "Start-up subsidies and the sources of venture capital," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    5. Xing Shi & Yanrui Wu & Dahai Fu & Xiumei Guo & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "Effects of National Science and Technology Programs on Innovation in Chinese Firms," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 207-236, Winter/Sp.
    6. Berger, Marius & Gottschalk, Sandra, 2021. "Financing and advising early stage startups: The effect of angel investor subsidies," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-069, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Kwangsoo Shin & Minkyung Choy & Chul Lee & Gunno Park, 2019. "Government R&D Subsidy and Additionality of Biotechnology Firms: The Case of the South Korean Biotechnology Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Xue Yang & Hao Zhang & Die Hu & Bingde Wu, 2023. "The timing dilemma: understanding the determinants of innovative startups’ patent collateralization for loans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 371-403, January.
    9. Schwienbacher, Armin, 2013. "The entrepreneur's investor choice: The impact on later-stage firm development," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 528-545.
    10. Kaplan, Steven & Strömberg, Per, 2002. "Characteristics, Contracts and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses," CEPR Discussion Papers 3243, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Simon Kleinert & Christine Volkmann & Marc Grünhagen, 2020. "Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: the role of prior financing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 341-365, January.
    12. Xiang, Xiaojian & Liu, Chuanjiang & Yang, Mian, 2022. "Who is financing corporate green innovation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 321-337.
    13. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2020. "The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 375-387.
    14. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark & Stavlöt, Ulrika, 2018. "Do investors and entrepreneurs match? – Evidence from The Netherlands and Sweden," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 112-126.
    15. Bellucci, Andrea & Pennacchio, Luca & Zazzaro, Alberto, 2023. "Debt financing of SMEs: The certification role of R&D Subsidies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Hu, Yefei & Liu, Dayong, 2022. "Government as a non-financial participant in innovation: How standardization led by government promotes regional innovation performance in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Lin, Boqiang & Zhang, Aoxiang, 2024. "Impact of government subsidies on total factor productivity of energy storage enterprises under dual-carbon targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    19. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11567-:d:1203201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.