IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11486-d1201714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Evaluation of the High-Quality Development of the Ecological and Economic Belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia

Author

Listed:
  • Chaochao Li

    (School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Engineering Research Center for Water-Saving Irrigation and Water Resources Regulation in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750001, China
    Engineering Technology Research Center of Water-Saving and Water Resources Regulation in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Wenfa Peng

    (School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Xiaojing Shen

    (School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Engineering Research Center for Water-Saving Irrigation and Water Resources Regulation in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750001, China
    Engineering Technology Research Center of Water-Saving and Water Resources Regulation in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Jingchao Gu

    (Ningxia Institute of Water Resources Research, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yadong Zhang

    (School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Mingyang Li

    (School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

Abstract

The measurement of high-quality economic development and regional research plays a crucial role in achieving ecologically led high-quality development. This paper aims to establish a comprehensive evaluation index system for the high-quality level of development in Ningxia’s Yellow River ecological and economic zone, focusing on five dimensions: innovation, coordination, green, openness, and shared. By employing a factor analysis, this study estimates the level of high-quality development along the Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt in Ningxia for the year 2020. A multi-index panel data factor analysis and entropy weight TOPSIS method are employed to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of high-quality development across 10 counties from 2014 to 2020. The empirical findings reveal that, in 2020, the overall level of high-quality development in the region remained relatively low. Among the contributing factors, shared and coordinated development demonstrated the highest impact on high-quality development, while open, green, and innovative development showed limited influence. Only Xingqing District, Litong District, and Helan County in the 10 counties have a composite factor score of greater than 0 on the level of economic development, while the other 7 counties have a composite score of less than 0. The study also identified a significant spatial heterogeneity in the quality of high-quality development along Ningxia’s Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt. Through a cluster analysis, the regions along the Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt in Ningxia are classified into categories of high, medium, and low levels of quality development. Over the period from 2014 to 2020, each county exhibited a steady increase in high-quality development, while the differences in development levels among the 10 counties gradually diminished. Based on these findings, practical suggestions are provided to guide Ningxia in leading the path of high-quality development through ecological civilization construction along the Yellow River ecological economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaochao Li & Wenfa Peng & Xiaojing Shen & Jingchao Gu & Yadong Zhang & Mingyang Li, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the High-Quality Development of the Ecological and Economic Belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11486-:d:1201714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Wogbe Agbola, 2014. "Modelling the impact of foreign direct investment and human capital on economic growth: empirical evidence from the Philippines," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 272-289, April.
    2. Zhentao Li & Hongping Yan & Xiuxin Liu, 2023. "Evaluation of China’s Rural Industrial Integration Development Level, Regional Differences, and Development Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Vera P. Samarina & Tatiana P. Skufina & Diana Yu. Savon & Alexey I. Shinkevich, 2021. "Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Niebel, Thomas, 2018. "ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Baili & Duan, Quntao & Zhao, Wenzhi & Wang, Lixin & Zhong, Yanxia & Zhuang, Yanli & Chang, Xueli & Dong, Chunyuan & Du, Wentao & Luo, Lihui, 2023. "Oasis sustainability is related to water supply mode," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Ana Gomes & José G. Dias, 2023. "Is there a Common Digital Market in the European Union? Implications for the European Digitalization Strategy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 797-814, May.
    3. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Alsu R. Akhmetshina & Ruslan R. Khalilov, 2022. "Development of a Methodology for Forecasting the Sustainable Development of Industry in Russia Based on the Tools of Factor and Discriminant Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    5. Gopalan, Sasidaran & Reddy, Ketan & Sasidharan, Subash, 2022. "Does digitalization spur global value chain participation? Firm-level evidence from emerging markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Carmen Díaz-Roldán & María del Carmen Ramos-Herrera, 2021. "Innovations and ICT: Do They Favour Economic Growth and Environmental Quality?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Javier Barbero & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2022. "Technological, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-332, October.
    8. Ngozi Adeleye & Chiamaka Eboagu, 2019. "Evaluation of ICT development and economic growth in Africa," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 31-53, April.
    9. Sepehrdoust, Hamid & Zamani Shabkhaneh, Saber, 2018. "How knowledge base factors change natural resource curse to economic growth?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 149-154.
    10. AFAWUBO, Komivi & NOGLO, Yawo Agbényégan, 2022. "ICT and entrepreneurship: A comparative analysis of developing, emerging and developed countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Bacha, Radia & Gasmi, Farid, 2022. "The broadband diffusion process and its determinants in Algeria: A simultaneous estimation," TSE Working Papers 22-1309, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Mwananziche, Josephat & Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus & Moshi, Goodiel, 2023. "Is digitalization a booster for economic growth in Africa? Short run and long run evidence from Tanzania," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    14. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    15. Njangang, Henri & Beleck, Alim & Tadadjeu, Sosson & Kamguia, Brice, 2022. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    16. Henri Njangang & Alim Beleck & Sosson Tadadjeu & Brice Kamguia, 2021. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 21/057, African Governance and Development Institute..
    17. Thanh Dinh Su & Canh Phuc Nguyen, 2022. "Foreign financial flows, human capital and economic growth in African developing countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3010-3031, July.
    18. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Irina G. Ershova & Farida F. Galimulina & Alla A. Yarlychenko, 2021. "Innovative Mesosystems Algorithm for Sustainable Development Priority Areas Identification in Industry Based on Decision Trees Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Samba Diop & Simplice A. Asongu, 2022. "Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) as catalyst for the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) at the local level in Africa," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 22/084, African Governance and Development Institute..
    20. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2020. "Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11486-:d:1201714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.