IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11390-d1199877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Liking and Disliking in the Historical Urban Landscape of Ibarra, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Morella Briceño-Avila

    (School of Architecture, Design and Arts, Architecture Career, Ibarra Campus, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Ibarra 100112, Ecuador)

  • Ernesto Antonio Ponsot-Balaguer

    (School of Architecture, Design and Arts, Civil Engineering Career, Ibarra Campus, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Ibarra 100112, Ecuador)

  • Alfonso Rondón-González

    (School of Architecture, Design and Arts, Architecture Career, Ibarra Campus, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Ibarra 100112, Ecuador)

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study on opinions on the elements and spaces of the historical urban landscape in Ibarra, Ecuador. This research aimed to propose an objective way of interpreting historical landscapes based on the opinions of people who frequent those places. Our hypothesis was that personal characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational level, and frequency of visits) condition people’s judgments of urban landscapes, and we aimed to establish which of these characteristics were the most influential. A survey was conducted in the place of study, and passers-by were asked to mention three elements and spaces that they liked or disliked. The methodology had two parts: a descriptive statistical analysis that was used to locate each point on a map and a logistic regression model to study the relationships between people’s opinions and their personal characteristics. The results show that (1) it was possible to demonstrate the elements and spaces that were liked and disliked in proportion graphs and planimetry and (2) that an explanatory analysis of opinions could be carried out using a logistic regression model to study significant characteristics. We found that the frequency of visits was the most significant characteristic for the elements and spaces that were disliked. We also concluded that the results of this study could provide objective tools for obtaining the opinions of people and combining them with planimetry. Additionally, the results could be used to establish priorities for urban authorities regarding improvements and interventions for elements and spaces that people like or dislike.

Suggested Citation

  • Morella Briceño-Avila & Ernesto Antonio Ponsot-Balaguer & Alfonso Rondón-González, 2023. "Study on Liking and Disliking in the Historical Urban Landscape of Ibarra, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11390-:d:1199877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Johansson & Catharina Sternudd & Mattias Kärrholm, 2016. "Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 256-275, April.
    2. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Cultural Memories and Sense of Place in Historic Urban Landscapes: The Case of Masrah Al Salam, the Demolished Theatre Context in Alexandria, Egypt," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Bartosz Czarnecki & Michał Pawel Chodorowski, 2021. "Urban Environment during Post-War Reconstruction: Architectural Dominants and Nodal Points as Measures of Changes in an Urban Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. María Luisa Méndez & Gabriel Otero & Felipe Link & Ernesto López Morales & Modesto Gayo, 2021. "Neighbourhood cohesion as a form of privilege," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1691-1711, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Memory for Social Sustainability: Recalling Cultural Memories in Zanqit Alsitat Historical Street Market, Alexandria, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Catalina Ortiz, 2024. "Writing the Latin American city: Trajectories of urban scholarship," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 399-425, February.
    3. Maria Johansson & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Mikael Nilsson, 2020. "Video Analysis of Pedestrian Movement (VAPM) under Different Lighting Conditions—Method Exploration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Benz, Pierre & Strebel, Michael A. & Di Capua, Roberto & Mach, André, 2024. "The residential patterns of Swiss urban elites. Continuity and change across elite categories (1890–2000)," SocArXiv mkaqx, Center for Open Science.
    5. Mousazadeh Hossein, 2022. "Environmental Social Science and Urban Environment Management: A Review of Pathways Linking Policies and Planning to Citizens Living by the River," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 127-139, December.
    6. Johan Rahm & Maria Johansson, 2021. "Assessment of Outdoor Lighting: Methods for Capturing the Pedestrian Experience in the Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Shujing Dong & Danjie Shen, 2023. "A Study of Historical Urban Landscape Layering in Luoyang Based on Historical Map Translation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Gabriel Otero & Quentin Ramond & María Luisa Méndez & Rafael Carranza & Felipe Link & Javier Ruiz-Tagle, 2024. "The damages of stigma, the benefits of prestige: Examining the consequences of perceived residential reputations on neighbourhood attachment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 462-494, February.
    9. Peng Yang & Shanshan Dai & Honggang Xu & Peng Ju, 2018. "Perceived Environmental, Individual and Social Factors of Long-Distance Collective Walking in Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Federica Bianchi & Dafni Riga & Rossella Moscarelli & Paolo Pileri, 2023. "Designing Urban Spaces to Enhance Active and Sustainable Mobility: An Analysis of Physical and Symbolic Affordances in School Squares in the Metropolitan Area of Milan, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Shuxiao Ma & Wei Huang & Nana Cui & Zhaoyang Cai & Yan Xu & Yue Qiao, 2024. "Exploring Non-Linear and Synergistic Effects of Street Environment on the Spirit of Place in Historic Districts: Using Multi-Source Data and XGBoost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    12. Junjun Li & Jin Wang & Xun Li, 2024. "Heritage Value Assessment and Landscape Preservation of Traditional Chinese Villages Based on the Daily Lives of Local Residents: A Study of Tangfang Village in China and the UNESCO HUL Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Amit Birenboim & Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom & Hila Levit & Itzhak Omer, 2021. "The Study of Walking, Walkability and Wellbeing in Immersive Virtual Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Pimkamol Mattsson & Maria Johansson & Mai Almén & Thorbjörn Laike & Elizabeth Marcheschi & Agneta Ståhl, 2020. "Improved Usability of Pedestrian Environments After Dark for People with Vision Impairment: an Intervention Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Joanie Cayouette-Remblière & Eric Charmes, 2024. "Social ties in and out of the neighbourhood: Between compensation and cumulation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 1581-1603, June.
    16. Ding He & Wenting Chen & Jie Zhang, 2024. "Integrating Heritage and Environment: Characterization of Cultural Landscape in Beijing Great Wall Heritage Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, April.
    17. Barbara Ester Adele Piga & Nicola Rainisio & Gabriele Stancato & Marco Boffi, 2023. "Mapping the In-Motion Emotional Urban Experiences: An Evidence-Based Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    18. UnHyo Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Sylvia Y. He, 2021. "Pedestrianization Impacts on Air Quality Perceptions and Environment Satisfaction: The Case of Regenerated Streets in Downtown Seoul," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Winston Yap & Jiat-Hwee Chang & Filip Biljecki, 2023. "Incorporating networks in semantic understanding of streetscapes: Contextualising active mobility decisions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1416-1437, July.
    20. Blitz, Andreas & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2020. "Mobility design as a means of promoting non-motorised travel behaviour? A literature review of concepts and findings on design functions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11390-:d:1199877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.