IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11185-d1196547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Forming Markets for Indigenous Peoples’ Organic Products

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Rafiee

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

  • Omid Karami

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Hamid Reza Saeidi Goraghani

    (Department of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

  • Hossein Azarnivand

    (Department of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

  • Hossein Arzani

    (Department of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

Abstract

Iranian nomads’ meat and dairy products are organic and more valuable than conventional products for trading and supplying in local markets. This is due to the use of natural nutritional supplementation, without hormones and artificial chemicals, in breeding domestic animals. However, the real value of the organic products is not reflected in the market. In this regard, we studied the feasibility of forming a local market for nomads’ organic meat and milk products in Iran. This study used a sample of 366 questionnaires from nomads of five famous tribes, namely Soleimani, Mehni, Kochomi, Jebalbarezi, and Aieneyi in Kerman province and 794 questionnaires from non-nomadic consumers. The results indicate that nomads’ average willingness to accept (WTA) was 0.46 USD per liter and 5.64 USD per kg in the sale of organic milk and organic meat, respectively. Also, the consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for organic milk and organic meat was 0.50 USD per liter and 6.15 USD per kg, respectively. Since the WTA for both products was less than the WTP, the formation and development of local markets in supplying organic products are possible. The appropriate price policy for organic products in such markets can provide nomads with financial benefits and consumers with access to healthy foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Rafiee & Omid Karami & Hamid Reza Saeidi Goraghani & Hossein Azarnivand & Hossein Arzani, 2023. "Feasibility of Forming Markets for Indigenous Peoples’ Organic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11185-:d:1196547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodriguez, Elsa M. & Lacaze, Maria Victoria & Lupin, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: Evidence from a consumer survey," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7873, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. W. Michael Hanemann, 1994. "Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 19-43, Fall.
    3. Heo, Joo-Nyung & Sung, Myunghwan, 2004. "Measuring Consumers' Value of Organic-Beef using Contingent Valuation Method," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 27(4), December.
    4. Corsi Alessandro & Novelli Silvia, 2002. "Measuring quantity-constrained and maximum prices consumers are willing to pay for quality improvements: the case of organic beef meat," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 200207, University of Turin.
    5. Govindasamy, Ramu & Italia, John, 1999. "Predicting Willingness-To-Pay A Premium For Organically Grown Fresh Produce," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Michael Hanemann & John Loomis & Barbara Kanninen, 1991. "Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1255-1263.
    7. Rattanawan Mungkung & Saruda Sitthikitpanya & Sarocha Dangsiri & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Thai Hom Mali Rice to Support the Policy Decision on Organic Farming Area Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, July.
    8. van Doorn, Jenny & Verhoef, Peter C., 2011. "Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-180.
    9. Ghazali, Samane & Zibaei, Mansour & Azadi, Hossein, 2023. "Impact of livelihood strategies and capitals on rangeland sustainability and nomads' poverty: A counterfactual analysis in Southwest Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Gracia, Azucena & de Magistris, Tiziana, 2008. "The demand for organic foods in the South of Italy: A discrete choice model," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 386-396, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    2. Jerop, Rebecca, 2012. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Dairy Goat Milk in Siaya County, Kenya," Research Theses 243449, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Lloyd J.S Baiyegunhi & Sikhumbuzo E Mashabane & Nonjabulo C Sambo, 2018. "Influence of Socio-Psychological Factors on Consumer Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Organic Food Products," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 208-219.
    4. Railey, Ashley F. & Marsh, Thomas L., 2017. "Diagnostic Testing and Vaccine Matching: FMD in Tanzania," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258386, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Akoko, Peter Obuon & Gathungu, Edith & De Groote, Hugo, 2024. "Evaluating Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Maize Dryers in Njoro Sub-County, Nakuru, Kenya," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344279, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    6. Ebers Broughel, Anna, 2019. "On the ground in sunny Mexico: A case study of consumer perceptions and willingness to pay for solar-powered devices," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Stephan Zielke, 2017. "Can't Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 211-251, March.
    8. Amirnejad, Hamid & Khalilian, Sadegh & Assareh, Mohammad H. & Ahmadian, Majid, 2006. "Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 665-675, July.
    9. Owusu, Victor & Owusu, Michael Anifori, 2010. "Measuring Market Potential for Fresh Organic Fruit and Vegetable in Ghana," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95955, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    10. Powe, N. A. & Bateman, I. J., 2003. "Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 255-270, June.
    11. Yeongbae Choe & Hyesun Kim & Youngjoon Choi, 2022. "Willingness to pay for travel insurance as a risk reduction behavior: health-related risk perception after the outbreak of COVID-19," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 445-467, September.
    12. Diane Dupont, 2003. "CVM Embedding Effects When There Are Active, Potentially Active and Passive Users of Environmental Goods," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(3), pages 319-341, July.
    13. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Ndebele, Tom & Forgie, Vicky, 2017. "Estimating the economic benefits of a wetland restoration programme in New Zealand: A contingent valuation approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 75-89.
    15. Pour, Morteza Tahami & Kalashami, Mohammad Kavoosi, 2012. "Applying CVM for Economic Valuation of Drinking Water in Iran," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 2(3).
    16. Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Kristófersson, Daði Már, 2016. "Energy projects in Iceland – Advancing the case for the use of economic valuation techniques to evaluate environmental impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 104-113.
    17. Nur Hasanah, 2017. "Influence of Age and Education on Purchase Intention of Halal Labelled Food Among Indonesian Muslim Mothers," GATR Journals gjbssr490, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    18. Zapata, Samuel D. & Carpio, Carlos E., . "Distribution-Free Methods to Estimate Willingness to Pay Models Using Discrete Response Valuation Data," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(1).
    19. Boxall, Peter C. & Adamowicz, Wiktor L. & Swait, Joffre & Williams, Michael & Louviere, Jordan, 1996. "A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 243-253, September.
    20. Ghosh, Ranjan & Goyal, Yugank & Rommel, Jens & Sagebiel, Julian, 2017. "Are small firms willing to pay for improved power supply? Evidence from a contingent valuation study in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 659-665.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11185-:d:1196547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.