IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10933-d1192445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Optimal Individual Pitch Control Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Abhinandan Routray

    (School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Nitin Sivakumar

    (School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Sung-ho Hur

    (School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Deok-je Bang

    (Electric Machine and Drives Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KERI), Changwon 51543, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Wind turbines are subjected to asymmetric loads and fatigue with subsequent increases in their dimension and capacity, leading to a reduction in their lifetime. To address this problem, the individual pitch control (IPC) technique is quite familiar in the control of wind turbines. IPC is used to reduce the tilt and yaw moments, simultaneously alleviating the turbine blade-root bending moments (BRBMs). This study discusses the performance of model predictive control (MPC), H-infinity ( H ∞ ), and proportional and integral (PI)-based IPC strategies integrated with collective pitch control. The performance of the reported controllers has been validated using the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 5 MW full nonlinear reference wind turbine. Simulation studies are conducted at varying wind speeds and turbulent intensities as per international electrotechnical commission (IEC) norms. Comparative results in the time and frequency domains indicate that the H ∞ based IPC achieves enhanced control performance in terms of reduction in BRBMs and damage equivalent load compared to MPC and PI-based control strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhinandan Routray & Nitin Sivakumar & Sung-ho Hur & Deok-je Bang, 2023. "A Comparative Study of Optimal Individual Pitch Control Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10933-:d:1192445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10933/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10933/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sungsu Park & Yoonsu Nam, 2012. "Two LQRI based Blade Pitch Controls for Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Abhinandan Routray & Yiza Srikanth Reddy & Sung-ho Hur, 2023. "Predictive Control of a Wind Turbine Based on Neural Network-Based Wind Speed Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chae-Wook Lim, 2024. "A Study of a Gain-Scheduled Individual Pitch Controller for an NREL 5 MW Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Yingming Liu & Yi Wang & Xiaodong Wang, 2024. "Independent Pitch Adaptive Control of Large Wind Turbines Using State Feedback and Disturbance Accommodating Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taesu Jeon & Insu Paek, 2021. "Design and Verification of the LQR Controller Based on Fuzzy Logic for Large Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Nejra Beganovic & Jackson G. Njiri & Dirk Söffker, 2018. "Reduction of Structural Loads in Wind Turbines Based on an Adapted Control Strategy Concerning Online Fatigue Damage Evaluation Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Tang, Shize & Tian, De & Wu, Xiaoxuan & Huang, Mingyue & Deng, Ying, 2022. "Wind turbine load reduction based on 2DoF robust individual pitch control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 28-40.
    4. Amira Elkodama & Amr Ismaiel & A. Abdellatif & S. Shaaban & Shigeo Yoshida & Mostafa A. Rushdi, 2023. "Control Methods for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines (HAWT): State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Arash E. Samani & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Nezmin Kayedpour & Narender Singh & Lieven Vandevelde, 2020. "The Impact of Pitch-To-Stall and Pitch-To-Feather Control on the Structural Loads and the Pitch Mechanism of a Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Gao, Richie & Gao, Zhiwei, 2016. "Pitch control for wind turbine systems using optimization, estimation and compensation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 501-515.
    7. Njiri, Jackson G. & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "State-of-the-art in wind turbine control: Trends and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 377-393.
    8. Qianlong Zhu & Wenjing Xiong & Haijiao Wang & Xiaoqiang Jin, 2023. "Refined Equivalent Modeling Method for Mixed Wind Farms Based on Small Sample Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Jongmin Cheon & Jinwook Kim & Joohoon Lee & Kichang Lee & Youngkiu Choi, 2019. "Development of Hardware-in-the-Loop-Simulation Testbed for Pitch Control System Performance Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Kwansu Kim & Hyun-Gyu Kim & Yuan Song & Insu Paek, 2019. "Design and Simulation of an LQR-PI Control Algorithm for Medium Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Xingqi Hu & Wen Tan & Guolian Hou, 2023. "PIDD2 Control of Large Wind Turbines’ Pitch Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10933-:d:1192445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.