IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10033-d1178653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will Trade Protection Trigger a Surge in Investment-Related CO 2 Emissions? Evidence from Multi-Regional Input–Output Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mengmeng Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Hao Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Haopeng Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

Abstract

Current research has revealed that global trade promotes transnational investment and contributes to large amounts of CO 2 emissions. Recently, trade protectionism has gradually emerged. This study aims to explore the effect of global trade protection on investment-related CO 2 emissions. We construct an accounting framework for investment-related CO 2 emissions under trade freedom and trade restriction based on the MRIO model for the first time, and investment-related CO 2 emissions in 16 economies are determined in both trade freedom and trade restriction scenarios. The study uses normal trade and no-trade scenarios instead of free trade and restricted trade scenarios. Then, based on the comparison of the two scenarios, the effect of global trade protection on investment-related CO 2 emissions is revealed from the three levels of country, section, and trade links. It is found that global trade protection would lead to an increase of up to 546.17 million tons in investment-related CO 2 emissions under current trade structures. Transnational investment in the trade of end-stage intermediary goods contributed 81.6% of the total effect. In terms of countries, trade protection is quite disadvantageous to CO 2 emission reduction in China and India, and their CO 2 emissions would respectively increase by 105 million tons and 141.5 million tons compared to normal trade. The electricity, gas, and water supply sectors and the manufacturing sector are the main sectors for investment-related CO 2 emissions. This study reveals the effect of trade freedom and trade protection on the environment of various countries from the viewpoint of investment-related CO 2 emissions, which has important reference value for global CO 2 emission reduction in the context of the evolving trade situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengmeng Liu & Hao Wu & Haopeng Wang, 2023. "Will Trade Protection Trigger a Surge in Investment-Related CO 2 Emissions? Evidence from Multi-Regional Input–Output Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10033-:d:1178653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen, Hong-xing & Chen, Zhe & Yang, Qian & Liu, Jin-yi & Nie, Pu-yan, 2022. "Driving forces and mitigating strategies of CO2 emissions in China: A decomposition analysis based on 38 industrial sub-sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3814-3854, December.
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 843-857.
    4. Ghommem, Mehdi & Hajj, Muhammad R. & Puri, Ishwar K., 2012. "Influence of natural and anthropogenic carbon dioxide sequestration on global warming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 235, pages 1-7.
    5. Feng, Tong & Du, Huibin & Zhang, Zengkai & Mi, Zhifu & Guan, Dabo & Zuo, Jian, 2020. "Carbon transfer within China: Insights from production fragmentation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Amit K. Khandelwal & Pablo D. Fajgelbaum, 2022. "The Economic Impacts of the US–China Trade War," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 205-228, August.
    7. Haopeng Wang & Zhenzhi Zhao & Yingying Ma & Hao Wu & Fei Bao, 2023. "Sustainable Road Planning for Trucks in Urbanized Areas of Chinese Cities Using Deep Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. de Melo, Jaime & Solleder, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Barriers to trade in environmental goods: How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Andreoni, Valeria & Galmarini, Stefano, 2016. "Drivers in CO2 emissions variation: A decomposition analysis for 33 world countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-37.
    10. Paola Fezzigna & Simone Borghesi & Dario Caro, 2019. "Revising Emission Responsibilities through Consumption-Based Accounting: A European and Post-Brexit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei & Kunfu Zhu, 2013. "Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels," NBER Working Papers 19677, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Tang, Chor Foon & Tan, Bee Wah, 2015. "The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 447-454.
    13. Bu, Maoliang & Li, Shuang & Jiang, Lei, 2019. "Foreign direct investment and energy intensity in China: Firm-level evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 366-376.
    14. Zhang, Chuanguo & Zhou, Xiangxue, 2016. "Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 943-951.
    15. Deng, Guangyao & Xu, Yan, 2017. "Accounting and structure decomposition analysis of embodied carbon trade: A global perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 140-151.
    16. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng & Li, Rongrong, 2022. "Assessing supply chain greenness from the perspective of embodied renewable energy – A data envelopment analysis using multi-regional input-output analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1292-1305.
    17. Jeremy D. Shakun & Peter U. Clark & Feng He & Shaun A. Marcott & Alan C. Mix & Zhengyu Liu & Bette Otto-Bliesner & Andreas Schmittner & Edouard Bard, 2012. "Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7392), pages 49-54, April.
    18. Liu, Yisheng & Yang, Meng & Cheng, Feiyu & Tian, Jinzhao & Du, Zhuoqun & Song, Pengbo, 2022. "Analysis of regional differences and decomposition of carbon emissions in China based on generalized divisia index method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Cherniwchan, Jevan, 2017. "Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Qiu Shi & Alvarado, Rafael & Cuesta, Lizeth & Tillaguango, Brayan & Murshed, Muntasir & Rehman, Abdul & Işık, Cem & López-Sánchez, Michelle, 2022. "Asymmetric impacts of foreign direct investment inflows, financial development, and social globalization on environmental pollution," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 236-251.
    2. Munther Al-Nimer & Salah Kayed & Rizwan Ullah & Najib Ullah Khan & Muhammad Sualeh Khattak, 2022. "Mapping the Research between Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Concerns; Where Are We and Where to Go?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Xi Lin & Ling‐Yun He, 2023. "‘Going global’ and pollution in home country: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1135-1174, October.
    4. Tan, Yan & Uprasen, Utai, 2022. "The effect of foreign direct investment on renewable energy consumption subject to the moderating effect of environmental regulation: Evidence from the BRICS countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 135-149.
    5. Qamri, Ghulam Muhammad & Sheng, Bin & Adeel-Farooq, Rana Muhammad & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul, 2022. "The criticality of FDI in Environmental Degradation through financial development and economic growth: Implications for promoting the green sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Vishal Dagar & Farhan Ahmed & Farah Waheed & Štefan Bojnec & Muhammad Kamran Khan & Sana Shaikh, 2022. "Testing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis with the Role of Foreign Direct Investments and Total Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Ke Zhang & Xingwei Wang, 2021. "Pollution Haven Hypothesis of Global CO 2 , SO 2 , NO x —Evidence from 43 Economies and 56 Sectors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-27, June.
    8. LaPlue, Lawrence D., 2022. "Environmental consequences of natural gas wellhead pricing deregulation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Francesco Vona & Giovanni Marin & Davide Consoli, 2019. "Measures, drivers and effects of green employment: evidence from US local labor markets, 2006–2014," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 1021-1048.
    10. Zhang, Ming-ang & Lu, Shuling & Zhang, Sihan & Bai, Yanfeng, 2023. "The unintended consequence of minimum wage hikes: Evidence based on firms' pollution emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Acheampong, Alex O., 2019. "Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 156-179.
    12. Ling-Yun He & Liang Wang, 2019. "Import Liberalization of Intermediates and Environment: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Boachie, Micheal Kofi, 2020. "The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Jakob Lehr, 2023. "Import Competition and Firm-Level CO2 Emissions: Evidence from the German Manufacturing Industry," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_488, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    15. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2022. "Emission Reduction and Value-added Export Nexus at Firm Level," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    16. Huang, Geng & He, Ling-Yun & Lin, Xi, 2023. "Deterioration or improvement? Intermediate product import and enterprises' environmental performance," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 139-150.
    17. Ekundayo P. Mesagan & Wakeel A. Isola & Kazeem B. Ajide, 2019. "The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: evidence from BRICS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1561-1582, August.
    18. Barrows, Geoffrey & Ollivier, Hélène, 2021. "Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: Firm-level evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Xiao, Hao & Sun, Ke-Juan & Bi, Hui-Min & Xue, Jin-Jun, 2019. "Changes in carbon intensity globally and in countries: Attribution and decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1492-1504.
    20. Geoffrey Barrows & Helene Ollivier, 2016. "Emission intensity and firm dynamics: reallocation, product mix, and technology in India," GRI Working Papers 245, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10033-:d:1178653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.