IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9553-d1170800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Location Optimization of Urban Shared New Energy Vehicles Based on P-Median Model: The Example of Xuzhou City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jianmin Dang

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xiaozhen Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ying Xie

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ziyi Fu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Sharing new energy vehicles is crucial for addressing the issue of traditional vehicles’ carbon emissions, reducing urban traffic congestion, safeguarding the environment, and promoting citizens’ use of green transportation. However, the parking lot’s drawbacks—poor location, challenging parking, and difficulty finding a car—lead to a low popularity rate, few users, and infrequent use. How to scientifically choose parking outlets and maximize the advantages of sharing new energy vehicles has become an important topic in current urban traffic management. This paper constructed a “G-B-U” framework starting with quasi-public goods and stakeholders to analyze the factors influencing the location selection of these vehicles. On this basis, a three-stage location decision method of “market demand prediction—alternative network screening—location model solution” is proposed to optimize the location selection of shared new energy vehicles. The factors are analyzed, and numerical examples are studied, using the districts of Xuzhou City in China as examples: Gulou, Yunlong, and Quanshan. The findings indicate that the main variables influencing how frequently Xuzhou residents use shared new energy cars are network dispersion, rental and return convenience, and usage experience. After site selection optimization, the journey distance is nearly cut in half, saving users a significant amount of travel time. It may meet the travel needs of residents better based on the same number of parking lots.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianmin Dang & Xiaozhen Wang & Ying Xie & Ziyi Fu, 2023. "The Location Optimization of Urban Shared New Energy Vehicles Based on P-Median Model: The Example of Xuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9553-:d:1170800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheetal Ghorpade & Marco Zennaro & Bharat Chaudhari, 2021. "Survey of Localization for Internet of Things Nodes: Approaches, Challenges and Open Issues," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Soopramanien, Didier & Tyfield, David, 2021. "Buy, lease, or share? Consumer preferences for innovative business models in the market for electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kaushal, Vikrant & Kant, Rishi & Kumar Singh, Pankaj, 2021. "Consumer adoption intention for electric vehicles: Insights and evidence from Indian sustainable transportation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Tyfield, David & Soopramanien, Didier, 2021. "On the heterogeneity in consumer preferences for electric vehicles across generations and cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Zenginis, Ioannis & Vardakas, John S. & Zorba, Nizar & Verikoukis, Christos V., 2016. "Analysis and quality of service evaluation of a fast charging station for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 669-678.
    6. Guo, Fang & Yang, Jun & Lu, Jianyi, 2018. "The battery charging station location problem: Impact of users’ range anxiety and distance convenience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Liu, Haoxiang & Zou, Yuncheng & Chen, Ya & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Optimal locations and electricity prices for dynamic wireless charging links of electric vehicles for sustainable transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Meilinda Fitriani Nur Maghfiroh & Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Hiroshi Onoda, 2021. "Current Readiness Status of Electric Vehicles in Indonesia: Multistakeholder Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Jaiswal, Deepak & Deshmukh, Arun Kumar & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Who will adopt electric vehicles? Segmenting and exemplifying potential buyer heterogeneity and forthcoming research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Hwang, Jeong Seop & Rho, Jae Jeung & Hwang, Yoon Min, 2023. "Influence of cognitive and social change factors on E-vehicle switching intention: Evidence from Korea," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Upadhyay, Nitin & Kamble, Aakash, 2023. "Examining Indian consumer pro-environment purchase intention of electric vehicles: Perspective of stimulus-organism-response," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Park, Junseok & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "A facility location problem in a mixed duopoly on networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Paweł Bryła & Shuvam Chatterjee & Beata Ciabiada-Bryła, 2022. "Consumer Adoption of Electric Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Zhang, Yue & Zhang, Qi & Farnoosh, Arash & Chen, Siyuan & Li, Yan, 2019. "GIS-Based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization of charging stations for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 844-853.
    12. Motoaki, Yutaka & Yi, Wenqi & Salisbury, Shawn, 2018. "Empirical analysis of electric vehicle fast charging under cold temperatures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 162-168.
    13. Davidov, Sreten, 2020. "Optimal charging infrastructure planning based on a charging convenience buffer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Tran, Cong Quoc & Keyvan-Ekbatani, Mehdi & Ngoduy, Dong & Watling, David, 2021. "Stochasticity and environmental cost inclusion for electric vehicles fast-charging facility deployment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Jacopo Piccioni & Paolo Rosa, 2023. "The Role of Automotive Flexibility in Supporting the Diffusion of Sustainable Mobility Initiatives: A Stakeholder Attitudes Assessment," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 459-481, September.
    18. Shi You & Junjie Hu & Charalampos Ziras, 2016. "An Overview of Modeling Approaches Applied to Aggregation-Based Fleet Management and Integration of Plug-in Electric Vehicles †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Pourvaziri, H. & Sarhadi, H. & Azad, N. & Afshari, H. & Taghavi, M., 2024. "Planning of electric vehicle charging stations: An integrated deep learning and queueing theory approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Cai, Zeen & Mo, Dong & Geng, Maosi & Tang, Wei & Chen, Xiqun Michael, 2023. "Integrating ride-sourcing with electric vehicle charging under mixed fleets and differentiated services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9553-:d:1170800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.