IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8965-d1162124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Aquavoltaics Investable? A Framework for Economic and Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lihchyi Wen

    (ERM Taiwan Co., Ltd., Taipei 104, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Hsu Lin

    (Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Chiao Lee

    (Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

Aquaculture has long been a significant industry in Taiwan, contributing significantly to the country’s GDP through both exports and domestic consumption. However, certain aquaculture practices have faced criticism due to their heavy groundwater usage, resulting in environmental damage such as land subsidence in the southwestern region of Taiwan. In order to change the industry’s negative environmental image and achieve the ambitious targets set by the Taiwanese government, including 20 GW of solar photovoltaic power by 2025 and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, the utilization of aquaculture lands, particularly aquaculture ponds, has emerged as a promising option for solar power development. As the government promotes the symbiosis of aquaculture and solar PV power to attain its renewable energy goals, various stakeholders have engaged in discussions surrounding this approach. Consequently, it is crucial to assess the costs and benefits of such integrated practices from both economic and environmental perspectives, as it will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the industry. A comparative analysis reveals that an aquaculture–electricity symbiosis with a capacity of 227 MW can further reduce carbon emissions by approximately 150,393.6 tons of CO2e per year, along with reductions of 56.8 tons/year of SOx, 82.3 tons/year of NOx, 3.7 tons/year of PM2.5, and 4.6 tons/year of PM10. These environmental benefits are equivalent to approximately TWD 7626.43 million annually. (Note: CO2e refers to carbon dioxide equivalent, SOx refers to sulfur oxides, NOx refers to nitrogen oxides, PM2.5 refers to fine particulate matter, and PM10 refers to particulate matter with a diameter of 10 μm or less).

Suggested Citation

  • Lihchyi Wen & Chun-Hsu Lin & Ying-Chiao Lee, 2023. "Are Aquavoltaics Investable? A Framework for Economic and Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8965-:d:1162124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agostini, A. & Colauzzi, M. & Amaducci, S., 2021. "Innovative agrivoltaic systems to produce sustainable energy: An economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Thi Thu Em Vo & Hyeyoung Ko & Jun-Ho Huh & Namje Park, 2021. "Overview of Solar Energy for Aquaculture: The Potential and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander V. Klokov & Egor Yu. Loktionov & Yuri V. Loktionov & Vladimir A. Panchenko & Elizaveta S. Sharaborova, 2023. "A Mini-Review of Current Activities and Future Trends in Agrivoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Krexner, T. & Bauer, A. & Gronauer, A. & Mikovits, C. & Schmidt, J. & Kral, I., 2024. "Environmental life cycle assessment of a stilted and vertical bifacial crop-based agrivoltaic multi land-use system and comparison with a mono land-use of agricultural land," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Vivar, M. & H, Sharon & Fuentes, M., 2024. "Photovoltaic system adoption in water related technologies – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    4. Poonia, Surendra & Jat, N.K. & Santra, Priyabrata & Singh, A.K. & Jain, Dilip & Meena, H.M., 2022. "Techno-economic evaluation of different agri-voltaic designs for the hot arid ecosystem India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 149-163.
    5. Grubbs, E.K. & Gruss, S.M. & Schull, V.Z. & Gosney, M.J. & Mickelbart, M.V. & Brouder, S. & Gitau, M.W. & Bermel, P. & Tuinstra, M.R. & Agrawal, R., 2024. "Optimized agrivoltaic tracking for nearly-full commodity crop and energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Casares de la Torre, F.J. & Varo, Marta & López-Luque, R. & Ramírez-Faz, J. & Fernández-Ahumada, L.M., 2022. "Design and analysis of a tracking / backtracking strategy for PV plants with horizontal trackers after their conversion to agrivoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 537-550.
    7. Gorjian, Shiva & Jalili Jamshidian, Farid & Gorjian, Alireza & Faridi, Hamideh & Vafaei, Mohammad & Zhang, Fangxin & Liu, Wen & Elia Campana, Pietro, 2023. "Technological advancements and research prospects of innovative concentrating agrivoltaics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    8. Tena Bujas & Marija Koričan & Manuela Vukić & Vladimir Soldo & Nikola Vladimir & Ailong Fan, 2022. "Review of Energy Consumption by the Fish Farming and Processing Industry in Croatia and the Potential for Zero-Emissions Aquaculture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Grazia Disciglio & Laura Frabboni & Annalisa Tarantino & Antonio Stasi, 2023. "Association between Dynamic Agrivoltaic System and Cultivation: Viability, Yields and Qualitative Assessment of Medical Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Girolamo Di Francia & Paolo Cupo, 2023. "A Cost–Benefit Analysis for Utility-Scale Agrivoltaic Implementation in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Junedi, M.M. & Ludin, N.A. & Hamid, N.H. & Kathleen, P.R. & Hasila, J. & Ahmad Affandi, N.A., 2022. "Environmental and economic performance assessment of integrated conventional solar photovoltaic and agrophotovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Cossu, Marco & Tiloca, Maria Teresa & Cossu, Andrea & Deligios, Paola A. & Pala, Tore & Ledda, Luigi, 2023. "Increasing the agricultural sustainability of closed agrivoltaic systems with the integration of vertical farming: A case study on baby-leaf lettuce," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    13. Ji, Zhengsen & Li, Wanying & Niu, Dongxiao, 2024. "Optimal investment decision of agrivoltaic coupling energy storage project based on distributed linguistic trust and hybrid evaluation method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    14. Anna Neumüller & Stefan Geier & Doris Österreicher, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment for Photovoltaic Structures—Comparative Study of Rooftop and Free-Field PV Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Chen, Xin & Zhou, Wenjia, 2023. "Performance evaluation of aquavoltaics in China: Retrospect and prospect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Jerome Wei Chiang Teng & Chew Beng Soh & Shiddalingeshwar Channabasappa Devihosur & Ryan Hong Soon Tay & Steve Kardinal Jusuf, 2022. "Effects of Agrivoltaic Systems on the Surrounding Rooftop Microclimate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Semeraro, Teodoro & Scarano, Aurelia & Curci, Lorenzo Maria & Leggieri, Angelo & Lenucci, Marcello & Basset, Alberto & Santino, Angelo & Piro, Gabriella & De Caroli, Monica, 2024. "Shading effects in agrivoltaic systems can make the difference in boosting food security in climate change," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    18. Cuppari, Rosa I. & Higgins, Chad W. & Characklis, Gregory W., 2021. "Agrivoltaics and weather risk: A diversification strategy for landowners," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    19. Al Mamun, Mohammad Abdullah & Garba, Ismail Ibrahim & Campbell, Shane & Dargusch, Paul & deVoil, Peter & Aziz, Ammar Abdul, 2023. "Biomass production of a sub-tropical grass under different photovoltaic installations using different grazing strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Sirnik, Igor & Oudes, Dirk & Stremke, Sven, 2024. "Agrivoltaics and landscape change: First evidence from built cases in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8965-:d:1162124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.