IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8872-d1160669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Low-Carbon Technology Investment Strategies for High Energy-Consuming Enterprises under the Health Co-Benefits of Carbon Emission Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Liu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Wenzhuo Sun

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

Abstract

The excessive use of fossil energy has led to a yearly increase in carbon dioxide and atmospheric pollutant emissions, and climate change has become increasingly prominent, seriously affecting people’s daily lives and physical and mental health. According to statistics, rising temperatures and extreme weather phenomena due to climate change have led to a 68% increase in heat-related deaths today compared to the period between 2000 and 2004, and a 61% increase in the number of days humans face high fire risks in the same period. Currently, in order to achieve synergistic economic and environmental development and enhance the health co-benefits of carbon emission reduction, it is urgent for high-energy-consuming enterprises to make sound low-carbon technology investment decisions. Therefore, in this paper, under the carbon quota and trading policy and carbon tax policy, and considering the existence of low-carbon preferences of consumers, the financial constraints of upstream high energy-consuming enterprises and sufficient funds of downstream retailers, a low-carbon technology investment decision model under intra-supply chain financing is constructed using Stackelberg game theory. Moreover, by applying the inverse induction method, we solve the optimal decision of low-carbon technology investment with three different subsidy methods: no subsidy, cost subsidy and product subsidy. Finally, the validity of the model is verified by numerical simulation, and the effects of different influencing factors on low-carbon technology investment are analyzed. The results show that: (1) the reasonable formulation of carbon trading price, carbon tax rate, cost subsidy ratio and product subsidy coefficient are important factors to promote enterprises’ low-carbon technology investment; (2) the improvement of consumers’ low-carbon preference level and the reduction in repayment interest rate can promote enterprises’ investment; (3) compared with no subsidy, cost subsidy and product subsidy can effectively improve enterprises’ low-carbon technology investment enthusiasm, and the effect of product subsidy is better than that of cost subsidy. The effect of product subsidies is better than that of cost subsidies. This paper aims to provide suggestions for the government to refine low-carbon technology investment incentive policies and for enterprises to optimize low-carbon technology investment decisions, so as to enhance the healthy co-benefits of carbon emission reduction and achieve green and sustainable economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Liu & Wenzhuo Sun, 2023. "Study on Low-Carbon Technology Investment Strategies for High Energy-Consuming Enterprises under the Health Co-Benefits of Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8872-:d:1160669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wencheng Yu & Shaobo Liu & Lili Ding, 2021. "Efficiency Evaluation and Selection Strategies for Green Portfolios under Different Risk Appetites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Dan Tong & Guannan Geng & Qiang Zhang & Jing Cheng & Xinying Qin & Chaopeng Hong & Kebin He & Steven J. Davis, 2021. "Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation depend on strategic power plant retirements and pollution controls," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(12), pages 1077-1083, December.
    3. Liu, Zheng & Huang, Yu-Qing & Shang, Wen-Long & Zhao, Yuan-Jun & Yang, Zao-Li & Zhao, Zhao, 2022. "Precooling energy and carbon emission reduction technology investment model in a fresh food cold chain based on a differential game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    4. Ibrahim A. Adekunle & Isiaq O. Oseni, 2021. "Fuel subsidies and Carbon Emission: Evidence from asymmetric modelling," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 21/001, African Governance and Development Institute..
    5. Wu, Tao & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2020. "Carbon emissions, technology upgradation and financing risk of the green supply chain competition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Weixin Yang & Yue Hu & Qinyi Ding & Hao Gao & Lingguang Li, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of the Green Development Level of Provinces in Eastern and Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Bowen Jiang & Yuangang Li & Weixin Yang, 2020. "Evaluation and Treatment Analysis of Air Quality Including Particulate Pollutants: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Zheng Liu & Wenzhuo Sun & Bin Hu & Chunjia Han & Petros Ieromonachou & Yuanjun Zhao & Jiazhuo Zheng, 2023. "Research on Supply Chain Optimization Considering Consumer Subsidy Mechanism in the Context of Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Yang, Lin & Xu, Mao & Yang, Yuantao & Fan, Jingli & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real option approach: Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Ofori, Charles Gyamfi & Bokpin, Godfred Alufar & Aboagye, Anthony Q.Q. & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony, 2021. "A real options approach to investment timing decisions in utility-scale renewable energy in Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Chaudhari, Urmila & Bhadoriya, Amrita & Jani, Mrudul Y. & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "A generalized payment policy for deteriorating items when demand depends on price, stock, and advertisement under carbon tax regulations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 556-574.
    12. Aryanpur, Vahid & Fattahi, Mahshid & Mamipour, Siab & Ghahremani, Mahsa & Gallachóir, Brian Ó & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Glynn, James, 2022. "How energy subsidy reform can drive the Iranian power sector towards a low-carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2019. "Carbon abatement with renewables: Evaluating wind and solar subsidies in Germany and Spain," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 172-202.
    14. Liu, Liyun & Zhao, Zhenzhi & Zhang, Mingming & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Green investment efficiency in the Chinese energy sector: Overinvestment or underinvestment?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Kang Pan & Feng He, 2022. "Does Public Environmental Attention Improve Green Investment Efficiency?—Based on the Perspective of Environmental Regulation and Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Weixin & Pan, Lingying & Ding, Qinyi, 2023. "Dynamic analysis of natural gas substitution for crude oil: Scenario simulation and quantitative evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Yuan, Ning & Li, Meijuan, 2024. "Research on collaborative innovation behavior of enterprise innovation ecosystem under evolutionary game," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Samira Ben Belgacem & Ghousia Khatoon & Abad Alzuman, 2023. "Role of Renewable Energy and Financial Innovation in Environmental Protection: Empirical Evidence from UAE and Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, May.
    4. Wang, Mingyue & Sun, Tianshi, 2023. "Leave for where? The impact of air quality on migration: Evidence at the city-pair level in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Annamaria Di Fabio & Andrea Svicher, 2023. "The Eco-Generativity Scale (EGS): A New Resource to Protect the Environment and Promote Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Lifan Yang & Junhua Liu & Weixin Yang, 2023. "Impacts of the Sustainable Development of Cross-Border E-Commerce Pilot Zones on Regional Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Liu, Feng & Lv, Tao & Meng, Yuan & Li, Cong & Hou, Xiaoran & Xu, Jie & Deng, Xu, 2023. "Potential analysis of BESS and CCUS in the context of China's carbon trading scheme toward the low-carbon electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 462-471.
    8. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Biancardi, Marta & Di Bari, Antonio & Villani, Giovanni, 2021. "R&D investment decision on smart cities: Energy sustainability and opportunity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P2).
    11. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Sinkovic, Dean, 2023. "Regional aspects of financial development and renewable energy: A cross-sectional study in 214 countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1142-1157.
    12. Hua Pan & Huimin Zhu & Minmin Teng, 2023. "Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Quemin, Simon & Trotignon, Raphaël, 2021. "Emissions trading with rolling horizons," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Helm, Carsten & Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Steering the energy transition in a world of intermittent electricity supply: Optimal subsidies and taxes for renewables and storage," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Chen, Yifeng & Khokarale, Santosh Govind & Bui, Thai Q. & Weiland, Fredrik & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Rudolfsson, Magnus & Mikkola, Jyri-Pekka & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Towards negative carbon emissions: Carbon capture in bio-syngas from gasification by aqueous pentaethylenehexamine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Waidelich, Paul & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "Renewable energy financing by state investment banks: Evidence from OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Jan Abrell & Sebastian Rausch & Clemens Streitberger, 2022. "The Economic and Climate Value of Flexibility in Green Energy Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(2), pages 289-312, October.
    18. Marek Vochozka & Veronika Machová & Eliška Sedmíková, 2021. "Fixing a payout ratio by dividend policies: a case of the utility sector," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 416-432, December.
    19. Jing Zou, 2024. "The Relationship Between Corporate Financialization and Digital Finance in the Era of Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13425-13448, September.
    20. Chen, Shi & Duan, Xiaoyu & Lin, Jyh-Horng & Chang, Ching-Hui, 2024. "Impact of carbon capture and storage, cap-and-trade, and multiproduct cost structure on pollution in an oligopoly," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8872-:d:1160669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.