IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8617-d1155844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on InsurTech and the Technology Innovation Level of Insurance Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Shujun Ye

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yujin Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    Department of Humanities and Management, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050200, China)

  • Lulu Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

New technologies are integrating and deeply influencing people’s work and life, and have become a key factor leading the continuous innovation of the insurance industry. The application of InsurTech has attracted widespread attention in the industry, and it is necessary to conduct in-depth deconstruction and analysis of its impact on insurance enterprise innovation to ensure the sustainability of technological innovation in insurance enterprises. Based on the panel data of Chinese insurance enterprises from 2011 to 2020, this paper empirically examines the relationship between InsurTech and enterprise technological innovation level and the mechanism of action by using the fixed effect model and the intermediary effect model. The empirical research results are as follows: (1) The development of InsurTech has significantly improved the technological innovation of insurance companies. (2) From the perspective of mechanism, InsurTech mainly improves the technological innovation level of insurance companies by alleviating financing constraints. (3) Furthermore, we also found significant differences in the promotional effect of InsurTech’s development on enterprises of different sizes and properties. At the same level of development, InsurTech has a greater and more significant “incentive effect” on the technological innovation level of non-state-owned enterprises and small and micro insurance enterprises. The research conclusion of this article not only enriches the literature on InsurTech and the technological innovation level of insurance companies, but also has significance for China’s insurance companies to help them formulate digital transformation policies and promote the “sustainable development” of technology empowerment insurance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Liu & Shujun Ye & Yujin Zhang & Lulu Zhang, 2023. "Research on InsurTech and the Technology Innovation Level of Insurance Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8617-:d:1155844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gian Paolo Clemente & Pierpaolo Marano, 2020. "The broker model for peer-to-peer insurance: an analysis of its value," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 457-481, July.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Thibault Fally & Stefano Scarpetta, 2007. "Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms [‘Dualism and macroeconomic volatility’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 22(52), pages 732-779.
    3. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2021. "Translating technological innovation into efficiency: the case of US public P&C insurance companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 565-585, December.
    4. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    5. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262731835, April.
    6. Emanuel Stoeckli & Christian Dremel & Falk Uebernickel, 2018. "Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 287-305, August.
    7. Volosovich Svetlana, 2016. "InsurTech: challeges and development perspectives," International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, CyberLeninka;ROSTranse Trade F Z C, issue 3 (5), pages 39-42.
    8. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, April.
    9. Sebastian Derikx & Mark de Reuver & Maarten Kroesen, 2016. "Can privacy concerns for insurance of connected cars be compensated?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(1), pages 73-81, February.
    10. Yang Lyu & Zheng Ji & Xiaoqi Zhang & Zhe Zhan, 2023. "Can Fintech Alleviate the Financing Constraints of Enterprises?—Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 393-410, June.
    12. Martin Eling & Martin Lehmann, 2018. "The Impact of Digitalization on the Insurance Value Chain and the Insurability of Risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(3), pages 359-396, July.
    13. Yuying Gao & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Nature, Financial Technology, and Corporate Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Michael McCrea & Mark Farrell, 2018. "A Conceptual Model for Pricing Health and Life Insurance Using Wearable Technology," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(3), pages 389-411, December.
    15. David M. Pooser & Mark J. Browne, 2018. "The Effects of Customer Satisfaction on Company Profitability: Evidence From the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(2), pages 289-308, September.
    16. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    17. Braun, Alexander & Schreiber, Florian, 2017. "The Current InsurTech Landscape: Business Models and Disruptive Potential," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 62, number 62.
    18. Simon Grima & Jonathan Spiteri & Inna Romānova, 2020. "A STEEP framework analysis of the key factors impacting the use of blockchain technology in the insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 398-425, July.
    19. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    20. Keith Blackburn & Victor T. Y. Hung, 1998. "A Theory of Growth, Financial Development and Trade," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 65(257), pages 107-124, February.
    21. Martin Eling & Davide Nuessle & Julian Staubli, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 205-241, April.
    22. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    23. Angela Zeier Röschmann & Matthias Erny & Joël Wagner, 2022. "On the (future) role of on-demand insurance: market landscape, business model and customer perception," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 603-642, July.
    24. Murinde, Victor & Rizopoulos, Efthymios & Zachariadis, Markos, 2022. "The impact of the FinTech revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    25. Steven N. Kaplan & Luigi Zingales, 1997. "Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(1), pages 169-215.
    26. Iván Sosa & Óscar Montes, 2022. "Understanding the InsurTech dynamics in the transformation of the insurance sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 35-68, April.
    27. Tugrul U. Daim & Abraham Hernandez, 2008. "A Framework For Managing The Forecasting Process," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 597-627.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Vincent Y.L., 2023. "Do InsurTech startups disrupt the insurance industry?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Serkan Eti & Hasan Dinçer & Hasan Meral & Serhat Yüksel & Yaşar Gökalp, 2024. "Insurtech in Europe: identifying the top investment priorities for driving innovation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2022. "Examining insurance companies’ use of technology for innovation," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 520-537, July.
    2. Guo, Junyan & Fang, Hanqing & Liu, Xuexin & Wang, Cizhi & Wang, Yuan, 2023. "FinTech and financing constraints of enterprises: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Iván Sosa Gómez & Óscar Montes Pineda, 2023. "What is an InsurTech? A scientific approach for defining the term," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 125-173, July.
    4. Iván Sosa & Óscar Montes, 2022. "Understanding the InsurTech dynamics in the transformation of the insurance sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 35-68, April.
    5. Christian Eckert & Christof Neunsinger & Katrin Osterrieder, 2022. "Managing customer satisfaction: digital applications for insurance companies," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 569-602, July.
    6. Cheng, Chao & Yang, Liu, 2022. "What drives the credit constraints faced by Chinese small and micro enterprises?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Bu, Ya & Du, Xin & Wang, Yuting & Liu, Shuyu & Tang, Min & Li, Hui, 2024. "Digital inclusive finance: A lever for SME financing?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2021. "Translating technological innovation into efficiency: the case of US public P&C insurance companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 565-585, December.
    9. Pierpaolo Marano, 2021. "Management of Distribution Risks and Digital Transformation of Insurance Distribution—A Regulatory Gap in the IDD," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Yuan, Li & Rao, Siqi & Yang, Shenggang & Dai, Pengyi, 2023. "Does equity market openness increase productivity? the dual effects of Shanghai-Hong Kong stock Connect program in China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2023. "SMEs’ behavior under financial constraints: An empirical investigation on the legal environment and the substitution effect with tax arrears," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Ruixin Su & Tong Zheng & Yuzhao Zhong & Weizhou Zhong, 2023. "Role of Digital Inclusive Finance for High-Quality Business Development: A Study of China’s “Five Development Concept” Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera, 2022. "Determinants of financing constraints," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1427-1439, March.
    15. Keming Li, 2021. "The effect of option trading," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, December.
    16. Chia-Ying Chan & Iftekhar Hasan & Chih-Yung Lin, 2021. "Agency cost of CEO perquisites in bank loan contracts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1221-1258, May.
    17. Gabriele Angori & David Aristei, 2020. "Heterogeneity and state dependence in firms’ access to credit: Microevidence from the euro area," SEEDS Working Papers 0220, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Feb 2020.
    18. Lou, Zhaohui & Xie, Qizhuo & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2024. "Does Supply Chain Finance (SCF) alleviate funding constraints of SMEs? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    19. Tao Shen, 2017. "Credit spreads and investment opportunities," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 117-152, January.
    20. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8617-:d:1155844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.