IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i8p143-d607067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of Distribution Risks and Digital Transformation of Insurance Distribution—A Regulatory Gap in the IDD

Author

Listed:
  • Pierpaolo Marano

    (Faculty of Business, Management and Economics, The University of Latvia, LV-1586 Rīga, Latvia
    Department of Legal Studies, The Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20122 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) aims to regulate insurance distribution in the EU regardless of distribution channels and means. Although new technologies affect insurance distribution, the IDD does not explicitly regulate this digital transformation. Insurers and intermediaries must comply with detailed business conduct rules that aim to counteract distribution risks. However, the IDD exempts ancillary insurance intermediaries from its scope when they meet certain conditions. The article highlights the regulatory framework on insurance, requiring insurers and intermediaries to address distribution risks, and analyses how this exemption affects the management of distribution risks in online distribution from a legal perspective. The focus on online distribution depends on the scale such distribution can achieve. The consideration of the scale allows for challenging the political choice behind the exemption of ancillary insurance intermediaries, which consists of the principle of proportionality. A regulatory proposal to counteract these adverse effects is to remove the exemption from the IDD rules for ancillary intermediaries in online distribution. Such a proposal is compliant with the principle of technological neutrality and is in line with the new legislative proposals in the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierpaolo Marano, 2021. "Management of Distribution Risks and Digital Transformation of Insurance Distribution—A Regulatory Gap in the IDD," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:8:p:143-:d:607067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/8/143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/8/143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emanuel Stoeckli & Christian Dremel & Falk Uebernickel, 2018. "Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 287-305, August.
    2. Gian Paolo Clemente & Pierpaolo Marano, 2020. "The broker model for peer-to-peer insurance: an analysis of its value," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 457-481, July.
    3. Tom Baker, "undated". "Insurance and the Law," University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers uconn_ucwps-1004, University of Connecticut School of Law.
    4. Baker, T. & Dellaert, B.G.C., 2017. "Regulating Robo Advice across the Financial Services Industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2017-004-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Martin Eling & Martin Lehmann, 2018. "The Impact of Digitalization on the Insurance Value Chain and the Insurability of Risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(3), pages 359-396, July.
    6. Braun, Alexander & Schreiber, Florian, 2017. "The Current InsurTech Landscape: Business Models and Disruptive Potential," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 62, number 62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Fras & D. Pauch & D. Walczak & A. Bera, 2024. "Determinants of the Behaviour of Entities on the Insurance Market in the Light of Changes Introduced by the IDD Directive," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 533-566, December.
    2. Pierpaolo Marano & Shu Li, 2023. "Regulating Robo-Advisors in Insurance Distribution: Lessons from the Insurance Distribution Directive and the AI Act," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Liu & Shujun Ye & Yujin Zhang & Lulu Zhang, 2023. "Research on InsurTech and the Technology Innovation Level of Insurance Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Iván Sosa & Óscar Montes, 2022. "Understanding the InsurTech dynamics in the transformation of the insurance sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 35-68, April.
    3. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2021. "Translating technological innovation into efficiency: the case of US public P&C insurance companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 565-585, December.
    4. Martin Eling & Davide Nuessle & Julian Staubli, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 205-241, April.
    5. Angela Zeier Röschmann & Matthias Erny & Joël Wagner, 2022. "On the (future) role of on-demand insurance: market landscape, business model and customer perception," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 603-642, July.
    6. Iván Sosa Gómez & Óscar Montes Pineda, 2023. "What is an InsurTech? A scientific approach for defining the term," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 125-173, July.
    7. Antonella Cappiello, 2020. "The Digital (R)evolution of Insurance Business Models," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Maik Dehnert, 2020. "Sustaining the current or pursuing the new: incumbent digital transformation strategies in the financial service industry," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1071-1113, November.
    9. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2022. "Examining insurance companies’ use of technology for innovation," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 520-537, July.
    10. Albrecht Fritzsche & Alexander Bohnert, 2022. "Implications of bundled offerings for business development and competitive strategy in digital insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(4), pages 817-834, October.
    11. Xian Xu & Peter Zweifel, 2020. "A framework for the evaluation of InsurTech," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 305-329, December.
    12. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Stop-loss protection for a large P2P insurance pool," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 210-233.
    13. Cao, Siqing & Lyu, Hanjia & Xu, Xian, 2020. "InsurTech development: Evidence from Chinese media reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2020. "Stop-loss protection for a large P2P insurance pool," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020028, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    15. Leigh Johnson, 2013. "Index Insurance and the Articulation of Risk-Bearing Subjects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2663-2681, November.
    16. Marc A. Ragin & Benjamin L. Collier & Johannes G. Jaspersen, 2021. "The effect of information disclosure on demand for high‐load insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 161-193, March.
    17. Mohammad Rahmati & David A. Hyman & Bernard Black & Charles Silver, 2016. "Insurance Crisis or Liability Crisis? Medical Malpractice Claiming in Illinois, 1980–2010," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 183-204, June.
    18. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Krzysztof Waliszewski & Anna Warchlewska, 2021. "How we can benefit from personal finance management applications during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Polish case," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 681-699, March.
    20. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer-to-peer property and casualty insurance business models," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:8:p:143-:d:607067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.