IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8549-d1155059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Wine Tourism Destination Image Measurement Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Gvantsa Sekhniashvili

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly utca 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

  • Zoltán Bujdosó

    (Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly utca 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

Abstract

Wine tourism plays an important role in the positioning strategies of wine destinations. As the competitiveness is high among wine destinations, it is important to identify the main factors that affect wine tourists’ decision making. One of the most important factors is the wine tourism destination’s image. To measure the image of a wine region, there is a need for a scale that is adapted to the characteristics of wine tourism destinations. Our purpose is to develop a scale that can measure any wine region’s image. We used a literature review and focus group interviews to collect scale attributes. We gathered responses using an online survey. Our respondents were mostly non-visitors. We used FA to analyze the data. We also tested the reliability of this scale using Cronbach’s Alpha. As a result, we developed a reliable scale with six factors. This can be further tested and used by any wine tourism destination to measure the people’s perceptions about them. The developed scale can have various purposes. It can be used by destination management organizations or marketing agencies. Measured images of wine region can be used in the planning of future positioning strategies and promotions. The scale can be used to compare the images of competitor wine regions. Images can also be studied during a period and any changes can be observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gvantsa Sekhniashvili & Zoltán Bujdosó, 2023. "Developing a Wine Tourism Destination Image Measurement Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8549-:d:1155059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Camprubí & Ariadna Gassiot-Melian, 2023. "Advances in Tourism Image and Branding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-3, February.
    2. Alvaro Dias & Bruno Sousa & Vasco Santos & Paulo Ramos & Arlindo Madeira, 2023. "Wine Tourism and Sustainability Awareness: A Consumer Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Brendan Burchell & Catherine Marsh, 1992. "The effect of questionnaire length on survey response," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 233-244, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Sousa & Elisabete Correia & Clara Viseu, 2024. "Exploring Portuguese Consumers’ Behavior Regarding Sustainable Wine: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Steven J. Tepper, 1998. "Making Sense of the Numbers: Estimating Arts Participation in America," Working Papers 57, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    3. Naomi Moy & Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2018. "How much is too much? The effects of information quantity on crowdfunding performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Gonzalo Díaz-Meneses & Maica Amador-Marrero, 2023. "The Experiential Wine Tourist’s Model: The Case of Gran Canaria Wine Cellar Establishments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Henk Roose & John Lievens & Hans Waege, 2007. "The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(3), pages 410-428, February.
    6. Xinjie Zheng & Xiaoting Chi, 2024. "Investigation on Festival Consumption Promotion Mechanism in the Post-Pandemic Period: The Case of the Qingdao International Beer Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Robert Voogt & Hetty Van Kempen, 2002. "Nonresponse Bias and Stimulus Effects in the Dutch National Election Study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 325-345, November.
    8. Marko Šostar & Vladimir Ristanović, 2023. "Assessment of Influencing Factors on Consumer Behavior Using the AHP Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Ane Kirstine Aare & Hanne Cooreman & Cristina Virto Garayoa & Esther Sótil Arrieta & Natalia Bellostas & Fleur Marchand & Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen, 2020. "Methodological Reflections on Monitoring Interactive Knowledge Creation during Farming Demonstrations by Means of Surveys and Observations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Pushkin Kachroo & Sheen Kachen, 2018. "Item placement for questionnaire design for optimal reliability," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(4), pages 120-126, December.
    11. Kirstine Hansen & Dylan Kneale, 2013. "Does How You Measure Income Make a Difference to Measuring Poverty? Evidence from the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 1119-1140, February.
    12. Miroshnychenko, Ivan & Strobl, Andreas & Matzler, Kurt & De Massis, Alfredo, 2021. "Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 670-682.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8549-:d:1155059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.