IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8260-d1150518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Irrigation Requirement Prediction Using Internet of Things and Transfer Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Angelin Blessy

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias Univeristy, Greater Noida 201310, India)

  • Avneesh Kumar

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias Univeristy, Greater Noida 201310, India)

  • Prabagaran A

    (Visa Consolidated Support Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore 560048, India)

  • Abdul Quadir Md

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India)

  • Abdullah I. Alharbi

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahlam Almusharraf

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Business and Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Surbhi B. Khan

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lebanese American University, Byblos P.O. Box 36/S-12, Lebanon
    Department of Data Science, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK)

Abstract

Irrigation systems are a crucial research area because it is essential to conserve fresh water and utilize it wisely. As a part of this study, the reliability of predicting the usage of water in the present and future is investigated in order to develop an effective prediction model to communicate demand. In order to improve prediction, we develop a prediction model and share the updated model with nearby farmers. In order to forecast the irrigation requirements, the recommended model utilizes the Internet of Things (IoT), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), cloud storage, long short-term memory (LSTM), and adaptive network fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques. By collecting real-time environmental data, KNN identifies the closest water requirement from the roots and its surrounding. In order to predict short-term requirements, ANFIS is used. To transfer the new requirements for better prediction, transfer learning is used. Time-series-data updates are predicted using LSTM for future forecasting, and the integrated model is shared with other farmers using cloud environments to enhance forecasting and analysis. For implementation, a period of nine to ten months of data was collected from February to December 2021, and banana tree was used to implement the planned strategy. Four farms, with measurements, were considered at varying intervals to determine the minimum and maximum irrigation needs. The requirements of farms were collected over time and compared to the predictions. Future requirements at 8, 16, 24, 32, and 48 h were also anticipated. The results indicated were compared to manual water pouring, and, thus, the entire crop used less water, making our prediction model a real-world option for irrigation. The prediction model was evaluated using R 2 , MSLE and the average initial prediction value of R 2 was 0.945. After using transfer learning, the prediction of the model of Farm-2, 3 and 4 were 0.951, 0.958 and 0.967, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelin Blessy & Avneesh Kumar & Prabagaran A & Abdul Quadir Md & Abdullah I. Alharbi & Ahlam Almusharraf & Surbhi B. Khan, 2023. "Sustainable Irrigation Requirement Prediction Using Internet of Things and Transfer Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8260-:d:1150518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olutobi Adeyemi & Ivan Grove & Sven Peets & Tomas Norton, 2017. "Advanced Monitoring and Management Systems for Improving Sustainability in Precision Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    3. Mahmoudi, Neda & Majidi, Arash & Jamei, Mehdi & Jalali, Mohammadnabi & Maroufpoor, Saman & Shiri, Jalal & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Mutating fuzzy logic model with various rigorous meta-heuristic algorithms for soil moisture content estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelum Sandamal & Sachini Shashiprabha & Nitin Muttil & Upaka Rathnayake, 2023. "Pavement Roughness Prediction Using Explainable and Supervised Machine Learning Technique for Long-Term Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Mohamed S. Abdalzaher & Moez Krichen & Derya Yiltas-Kaplan & Imed Ben Dhaou & Wilfried Yves Hamilton Adoni, 2023. "Early Detection of Earthquakes Using IoT and Cloud Infrastructure: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-38, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansoor, Umer & Jamal, Arshad & Su, Junbiao & Sze, N.N. & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Investigating the risk factors of motorcycle crash injury severity in Pakistan: Insights and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 21-38.
    2. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    3. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Kelly, T.D. & Foster, T. & Schultz, David M., 2023. "Assessing the value of adapting irrigation strategies within the season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Tim Voigt & Martin Kohlhase & Oliver Nelles, 2021. "Incremental DoE and Modeling Methodology with Gaussian Process Regression: An Industrially Applicable Approach to Incorporate Expert Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    8. Zhu, Haibin & Bai, Lu & He, Lidan & Liu, Zhi, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility with machine learning: Panel data perspective," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-271.
    9. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Zhang, Ning & Li, Zhiying & Zou, Xun & Quiring, Steven M., 2019. "Comparison of three short-term load forecast models in Southern California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Smyl, Slawek & Hua, N. Grace, 2019. "Machine learning methods for GEFCom2017 probabilistic load forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1424-1431.
    12. Barzin,Samira & Avner,Paolo & Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & O’Clery,Neave, 2022. "Where Are All the Jobs ? A Machine Learning Approach for High Resolution Urban Employment Prediction inDeveloping Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9979, The World Bank.
    13. Eike Emrich & Christian Pierdzioch, 2016. "Volunteering, Match Quality, and Internet Use," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 136(2), pages 199-226.
    14. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "On-line monitoring of power curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1487-1493.
    15. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    16. Catherine Ikae & Jacques Savoy, 2022. "Gender identification on Twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 58-69, January.
    17. Barkan, Oren & Benchimol, Jonathan & Caspi, Itamar & Cohen, Eliya & Hammer, Allon & Koenigstein, Noam, 2023. "Forecasting CPI inflation components with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1145-1162.
    18. Martijn Kagie & Michiel Van Wezel, 2007. "Hedonic price models and indices based on boosting applied to the Dutch housing market," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3‐4), pages 85-106, July.
    19. Matthias Bogaert & Michel Ballings & Dirk Van den Poel, 2018. "Evaluating the importance of different communication types in romantic tie prediction on social media," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 501-527, April.
    20. Dursun Delen & Hamed M. Zolbanin & Durand Crosby & David Wright, 2021. "To imprison or not to imprison: an analytics model for drug courts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 101-124, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8260-:d:1150518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.