IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8043-d1147438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Energy Reductions Compatible with Economic Growth?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Moriarty

    (Department of Design, Monash University-Caulfield Campus, P.O. Box 197, Caulfield East, VIC 3145, Australia)

  • Damon Honnery

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University-Clayton Campus, P.O. Box 31, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia)

Abstract

Our planet faces several serious and urgent challenges to sustainability including, but not limited to, climate change; however, most researchers argue that technological solutions can solve these problems. This review first examines the prospects for decoupling environmental damages in general from economic growth, considered at the global level; then, it looks at whether the recent advances in information and communication technology (ICT) can help. It is argued that although absolute decoupling may have occurred in some countries—even after accounting for energy-intensive imports—it has not occurred at the global level, which is the relevant level for global sustainability problems. This conclusion is strengthened by the very high correlation over the past three decades found between global gross domestic product (GDP) and several parameters relevant for sustainability, particularly for atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and ecological footprint as a function of GDP. ICT innovations relevant to energy use include smart grids and smart cities, especially smart urban transport. A review of recently published papers shows no definite findings of energy or carbon reduction, although some innovations show energy/carbon reduction potential if given strong policy support. Overall, it was concluded that the Earth’s sustainability challenges will probably need deep energy reductions, which in turn require profound sociopolitical changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2023. "Are Energy Reductions Compatible with Economic Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8043-:d:1147438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fizaine, Florian & Court, Victor, 2016. "Energy expenditure, economic growth, and the minimum EROI of society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 172-186.
    2. O'Sullivan, Michael & Gravatt, Michael & Popineau, Joris & O'Sullivan, John & Mannington, Warren & McDowell, Julian, 2021. "Carbon dioxide emissions from geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 990-1000.
    3. Moriarty, Patrick & Honnery, Damon, 2016. "Can renewable energy power the future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 3-7.
    4. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "Feasibility of a 100% Global Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Hall, Charles A.S. & Lambert, Jessica G. & Balogh, Stephen B., 2014. "EROI of different fuels and the implications for society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 141-152.
    6. Kim, Hakpyeong & Choi, Heeju & Kang, Hyuna & An, Jongbaek & Yeom, Seungkeun & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "A systematic review of the smart energy conservation system: From smart homes to sustainable smart cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Konrad Henryk Bachanek & Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski & Ewa Puzio & Anna Maroušková, 2021. "Intelligent Street Lighting in a Smart City Concepts—A Direction to Energy Saving in Cities: An Overview and Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Philip M. Fearnside, 2019. "Hydropower: don’t waste climate money on more dams," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7750), pages 33-33, April.
    9. Jason Hickel & Stéphane Hallegatte, 2022. "Can we live within environmental limits and still reduce poverty? Degrowth or decoupling?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
    10. Jason Hickel, 2019. "The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 873-884, September.
    11. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2022. "Renewable Energy and Energy Reductions or Solar Geoengineering for Climate Change Mitigation?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    12. James Rising & Marco Tedesco & Franziska Piontek & David A. Stainforth, 2022. "The missing risks of climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 643-651, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karime Chahuán-Jiménez & Rolando Rubilar-Torrealba & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Valeska V. Geldres-Weiss, 2023. "Cluster Analysis and Macroeconomic Indicators and Their Effects on the Evolution of the Use of Clean Energies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Sara Rupacz, 2024. "Transformation of Energy Resources in the Visegrad Group: Strategies, Results, and Climate Effectiveness," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2023. "Review: The Energy Implications of Averting Climate Change Catastrophe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Carlos de Castro & Iñigo Capellán-Pérez, 2020. "Standard, Point of Use, and Extended Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) from Comprehensive Material Requirements of Present Global Wind, Solar, and Hydro Power Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-43, June.
    3. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "Feasibility of a 100% Global Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2023. "Rethinking Notions of Energy Efficiency in a Global Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Graham Palmer, 2018. "A Biophysical Perspective of IPCC Integrated Energy Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Le Boulzec, Hugo & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Verzier, François & Vidal, Olivier & Mathy, Sandrine, 2022. "Dynamic modeling of global fossil fuel infrastructure and materials needs: Overcoming a lack of available data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    8. Dupont, Elise & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2018. "Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 322-338.
    9. Richard Heinberg & Timothy Crownshaw, 2018. "Energy Decline and Authoritarianism," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Lina I. Brand-Correa & Paul E. Brockway & Claire L. Copeland & Timothy J. Foxon & Anne Owen & Peter G. Taylor, 2017. "Developing an Input-Output Based Method to Estimate a National-Level Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Jean-François Fagnart & Marc Germain & Benjamin Peeters, 2020. "Can the Energy Transition Be Smooth? A General Equilibrium Approach to the EROEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    12. Kis, Zoltán & Pandya, Nikul & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M., 2018. "Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 144-157.
    13. Marco Vittorio Ecclesia & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Tiago Domingos, 2022. "A Comprehensive Societal Energy Return on Investment Study of Portugal Reveals a Low but Stable Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Hongshuo Yan & Lianyong Feng & Jianliang Wang & Yuanying Chi & Yue Ma, 2021. "A Comprehensive Net Energy Analysis and Outlook of Energy System in China," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Wiraditma Prananta & Ida Kubiszewski, 2021. "Assessment of Indonesia’s Future Renewable Energy Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Biofuel Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Damon Honnery & Patrick Moriarty, 2022. "Deep Reductions in Energy Use: Hobson’s Choice in Climate’s Last-Chance Saloon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4, December.
    17. James Ward & Steve Mohr & Robert Costanza & Paul Sutton & Luca Coscieme, 2020. "Renewable Energy Equivalent Footprint ( REEF ): A Method for Envisioning a Sustainable Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Jairo Filho Sousa de Almeida & Giseli Quirino Batista & José Eduardo Storopoli & Aaron Liu & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Understanding Sustainable Energy in the Context of Smart Cities: A PRISMA Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, March.
    19. Carlos Castro & Iñigo Capellán-Pérez, 2018. "Concentrated Solar Power: Actual Performance and Foreseeable Future in High Penetration Scenarios of Renewable Energies," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2019. "Energy Accounting for a Renewable Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8043-:d:1147438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.