IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8037-d1147488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Sustainable Teaching Models of New Business—Take Chinese University Business School as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Sihua Li

    (Business School, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Ying Li

    (Business School, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Haohan Lin

    (College of Communication, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Sustainable teaching model innovation is an important way to build a new business discipline in Chinese university business school; however, its effective implementation faces various challenges. This paper conducts an exploratory study on the current status of teaching practices in the business school of L University using personal interviews and questionnaire surveys. This paper compares the main performance of three stages in the initiation of teaching activities, use of teaching methods, and evaluation of teaching effectiveness in the business school of L University. We used project-based learning (PBL) theory, modular teaching theory, and deliberate practice theory to analyze three problems in business school teaching practice: lack of linkage between business knowledge modules, lack of articulation between business theory and business practice, and lack of systematic thinking in course assessment and evaluation. Based on the analysis of the above problems, this paper proposes three countermeasures: to reconstruct the relationship of “course-knowledge-tool” with modular thinking, to strengthen the linkage between theory and practice with deliberate practice, and to promote systemic thinking with real problems assessment. This research is essential to cultivate new business talents with “business theory + business skills + system logic”, and to build a new business talent education system for the digital economy and new consumer development requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihua Li & Ying Li & Haohan Lin, 2023. "Research on Sustainable Teaching Models of New Business—Take Chinese University Business School as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8037-:d:1147488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samreen Akhtar & Mansour Saleh Albarrak & Alam Ahmad & Hafiz Wasim Akram & Mohammad Daoud Ciddikie & Akbar Ali, 2022. "Drivers of Student Entrepreneurial Intention and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurship Education: Evidence from an Indian University," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-15, March.
    2. José Hanham & John McCormick & Adam Hendry, 2020. "Project-based learning groups of friends and acquaintances: The role of efficacy beliefs," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(2), pages 133-144, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Qu & Si Chen & Shugui Cao, 2023. "Examination in Accordance with Aptitude: Selection and Optimization of Curriculum Assessment Methods in Higher Education Adapted to the Teacher–Student Game Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Fan Zhang & Hongxia Yang & Shengbin Li, 2024. "A Multi-Project Evaluation of Engineering Students’ Performance for Online PBL: Taking the Sustainable Decision Analysis Course as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Ankui Hu & Xianhui Mao & Chenghua Fu & Mengkun Wu & Shuai Zhou, 2023. "Engineering Curriculum Reform Based on Outcome-Based Education and Five-Color Psychology Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8037-:d:1147488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.