IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v113y2020i2p133-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project-based learning groups of friends and acquaintances: The role of efficacy beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • José Hanham
  • John McCormick
  • Adam Hendry

Abstract

This school-based study explored the role of collective and proxy efficacy beliefs in the performances of project-based learning teams comprising friends and acquaintances. Participants were 162 male students in Grade 8 who attended a Catholic high school, located in Sydney, Australia. Students were organized into 20 acquaintance groups and 21 friendship groups. Each group comprised 4 students who were completing project-based learning assignments in Geography, Religious Studies, and English. Data were self-reports and teacher-assessed group performance scores. Data collection occurred three times over a five-week period. Multilevel modeling was used to examine relationships between variables in the study. Statistically significant interactions involving group type, collective efficacy, and proxy efficacy were identified in Geography and Religious Studies. Implications are that it may be advantageous for teachers to assign students to friendship groups, provided they nurture collective efficacy, and that proxy efficacy may negatively affect group performance, depending on the context.

Suggested Citation

  • José Hanham & John McCormick & Adam Hendry, 2020. "Project-based learning groups of friends and acquaintances: The role of efficacy beliefs," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(2), pages 133-144, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:113:y:2020:i:2:p:133-144
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1756729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2020.1756729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2020.1756729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sihua Li & Ying Li & Haohan Lin, 2023. "Research on Sustainable Teaching Models of New Business—Take Chinese University Business School as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:113:y:2020:i:2:p:133-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.