IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7750-d1142503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eucalyptus Carbon Stock Research in an Integrated Livestock-Forestry System in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Moura Morales

    (Embrapa Florestas, Estrada da Ribeira, Km 111, Guaraituba, Caixa Posta 319, Colombo 83411-000, PR, Brazil)

  • Hélio Tonini

    (Embrapa Pecuária Sul, Rodovia BR-153, Km 632.9 Vila Industrial, Zona Rural, Caixa Postal 242, Bagé 96401-970, RS, Brazil)

  • Maurel Behling

    (Embrapa Agrosilvopastoral, Rodovia dos Pioneiros MT-222, Km 2.5, Zona Rural Caixa Postal 343, Sinop 78550-970, MT, Brazil)

  • Aaron Kinyu Hoshide

    (College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture, The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
    AgriSciences, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Caixa Postal 729, Sinop 78550-970, MT, Brazil)

Abstract

Eucalyptus plantations play an important role in capturing and storing atmospheric carbon, mitigating global climate change. Forest management policies encouraging integrated livestock-forestry systems require quantitative estimates of temporal and spatial patterns of carbon storage for these agricultural systems. This study quantified the effects of eucalyptus management and arrangement on carbon stock dynamics in integrated livestock-forestry (ILF) systems versus monoculture eucalyptus plantings. Arrangement and management resulted in equal storage of carbon in both monoculture and ILF systems (34.7 kg per tree). Both factors are important to better understand how forest species in integrated systems stock carbon and how this can compensate for other agricultural system components, such as cattle. The extent to which ILF systems offset beef cattle ( Nellore ) emissions was determined by estimating changes in carbon stock over time for Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis , clone H13, under three scenarios (S) of wood use. These scenarios were (S1) tree growth without thinning, (S2) trees used for biomass energy without thinning, and (S3) 50% of trees used for biomass energy at five years old and 50% of trees used for both timber and energy after eight years, considering the full life cycle of eucalyptus. The S1 and S3 systems can stock 510 and 73 metric tons (t) of CO 2 ha −1 , respectively, while S2 emits 115 t CO 2 ha −1 of biogenic carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Moura Morales & Hélio Tonini & Maurel Behling & Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2023. "Eucalyptus Carbon Stock Research in an Integrated Livestock-Forestry System in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7750-:d:1142503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabian H. Härtl & Sebastian Höllerl & Thomas Knoke, 2017. "A new way of carbon accounting emphasises the crucial role of sustainable timber use for successful carbon mitigation strategies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 1163-1192, December.
    2. Luana Molossi & Aaron Kinyu Hoshide & Daniel Carneiro de Abreu & Ronaldo Alves de Oliveira, 2023. "Agricultural Support and Public Policies Improving Sustainability in Brazil’s Beef Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Cardoso, Abmael S. & Berndt, Alexandre & Leytem, April & Alves, Bruno J.R. & de Carvalho, Isabel das N.O. & de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique & Urquiaga, Segundo & Boddey, Robert M., 2016. "Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 86-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco & Moreno Lerma, Leonardo & Triana Ángel, Natalia & Burkart, Stefan, 2024. "The relationships between land tenure, cattle production, and climate change – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ymène Fouli & Margot Hurlbert & Roland Kröbel, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Canadian Agriculture: Estimates and Measurements," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(35), November.
    2. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. André Pastori D’Aurea & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Yuri Santa Rosa Guimarães & Lauriston Bertelli Fernandes & Luis Eduardo Ferreira & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2021. "Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Production in Brazil through Animal Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Knoke, Thomas & Kindu, Mengistie & Jarisch, Isabelle & Gosling, Elizabeth & Friedrich, Stefan & Bödeker, Kai & Paul, Carola, 2020. "How considering multiple criteria, uncertainty scenarios and biological interactions may influence the optimal silvicultural strategy for a mixed forest," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Mosnier, Claire & Duclos, Anne & Agabriel, Jacques & Gac, Armelle, 2017. "Orfee: A bio-economic model to simulate integrated and intensive management of mixed crop-livestock farms and their greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 202-215.
    6. Dakpo, K Hervé & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Agri-environmental subsidies and French suckler cow farms’ technical efficiency accounting for GHGs," Working Papers 245192, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    7. Dumas, Patrice & Wirsenius, Stefan & Searchinger, Tim & Andrieu, Nadine & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2022. "Options to achieve net-zero emissions from agriculture and land use changes in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12385, Inter-American Development Bank.
    8. Mengistie Kindu & Logan Robert Bingham & José G. Borges & Susete Marques & Olha Nahorna & Jeannette Eggers & Thomas Knoke, 2022. "Opportunity Costs of In Situ Carbon Storage Derived by Multiple-Objective Stand-Level Optimization—Results from Case Studies in Portugal and Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Kolo, Horst & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2020. "Optimizing forest management for timber production, carbon sequestration and groundwater recharge," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Calvano, Maria Paula Cavuto Abrão & Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro & Barros, Jacqueline Cavalcante & Garcia, Marcos Valério & Martins, Kauê Rodriguez & Andreotti, Renato, 2021. "Bioeconomic simulation of Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in different beef cattle production systems in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Maciel, Isabella C.F. & Barbosa, Fabiano A. & Alves, Bruno J.R. & Alvarenga, Ramon C. & Tomich, Thierry R. & Campanha, Mônica M. & Rowntree, Jason E. & Alves, Filipe C. & Lana, Ângela M.Q., 2021. "Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from beef cattle excreta deposited on feedlot pen surface in tropical conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Zamora-Pereira, Juan Carlos & Hanewinkel, Marc & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2023. "Robust management strategies promoting ecological resilience and economic efficiency of a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Southwest Germany under the risk of severe drought," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Searchinger, Timothy D. & Beringer, Tim & Strong, Asa, 2017. "Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 434-446.
    14. Édson Luis Bolfe & Daniel de Castro Victoria & Edson Eyji Sano & Gustavo Bayma & Silvia Maria Fonseca Silveira Massruhá & Aryeverton Fortes de Oliveira, 2024. "Potential for Agricultural Expansion in Degraded Pasture Lands in Brazil Based on Geospatial Databases," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Alexandre C. Köberle & Pedro R. R. Rochedo & André F. P. Lucena & Alexandre Szklo & Roberto Schaeffer, 2020. "Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2 °C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1823-1842, October.
    16. Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Angélica Santos Rabelo de Souza Bahia & Juliana Duarte Messana & Eduardo Festozo Vicente & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2023. "Additive Tannins in Ruminant Nutrition: An Alternative to Achieve Sustainability in Animal Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Jarisch, Isabelle & Bödeker, Kai & Bingham, Logan Robert & Friedrich, Stefan & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "The influence of discounting ecosystem services in robust multi-objective optimization – An application to a forestry-avocado land-use portfolio," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2023. "Sustainable Development Agricultural Economics and Policy: Intensification versus Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, June.
    19. Veronica Garcia Donoso & Mayumi C. M. Hirye & Christiane Gerwenat & Christa Reicher, 2024. "Amazon Deforestation and Global Meat Consumption Trends: An Assessment of Land Use Change and Market Data from Rondônia That Shows Why We Should Consider Changing Our Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Andrey & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7750-:d:1142503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.