IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p212-d1012415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Optimization of Landscape Preference Characteristics of Rural Public Space Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: The Case of Huangshandian Village, China

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Su

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kaiping Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shuangshuang Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xinyan Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huan Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huanru Ding

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanfei Chen

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chenhui Liu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Min Liu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunlu Zhang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

As an important part of rural space, the public space landscape has a positive influence on tourists and local residents, and also has an important guiding significance for the sustainable development of rural areas. This study expands the previous research on rural public space, taking the “user-oriented” landscape preference as an important entry point, taking Beijing rural public space as the research object, using eye-tracking technology to objectively reflect the degree of users’ preference for the landscape, making quantitative analysis through eye-tracking objective data and subjective satisfaction evaluation to explore the subconscious and aesthetic laws of the subjects, and summarizing the internal driving factors leading to its evolution from the summary of phenomena. This paper explores the visual behavior information and significance behind the “subjective space” created by the countryside for the users, intending to provide strategies for landscape optimization and the management of rural public space in an effort to aid the sustainable development of the countryside.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Su & Kaiping Wang & Shuangshuang Li & Xinyan Wang & Huan Li & Huanru Ding & Yanfei Chen & Chenhui Liu & Min Liu & Yunlu Zhang, 2022. "Analysis and Optimization of Landscape Preference Characteristics of Rural Public Space Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: The Case of Huangshandian Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:212-:d:1012415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bachleitner, Reinhard & Zins, Andreas H., 1999. "Cultural Tourism in Rural Communities: The Residents' Perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 199-209, March.
    2. Wen Hu & Yuquan Xie & Shuting Yan & Xilin Zhou & Chuancheng Li, 2022. "The Reshaping of Neighboring Social Networks after Poverty Alleviation Relocation in Rural China: A Two-Year Observation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Robert B. Noland & Marc D. Weiner & Dong Gao & Michael P. Cook & Anton Nelessen, 2017. "Eye-tracking technology, visual preference surveys, and urban design: preliminary evidence of an effective methodology," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 98-110, January.
    4. Guoliang Xu & Yi Li & Iain Hay & Xiuqing Zou & Xiaosong Tu & Baoqiang Wang, 2019. "Beyond Place Attachment: Land Attachment of Resettled Farmers in Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Shuping Huang & Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch & Weicong Fu & Jinda Qi & Ziru Chen & Zhipeng Zhu & Jianwen Dong, 2018. "Does Adding Local Tree Elements into Dwellings Enhance Individuals’ Homesickness? Scenario-Visualisation for Developing Sustainable Rural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Gabriele Paolinelli & Marco Cei & Nicoletta Cristiani & Ludovica Marinaro & Flavia Veronesi, 2022. "Don’t Split Them Up! Landscape Design of Multifunctional Open Spaces Suitable for Coping with Flash Floods and River Floods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Jing Wu & Xirui Chen & Shulin Chen, 2019. "Temporal Characteristics of Waterfronts in Wuhan City and People’s Behavioral Preferences Based on Social Media Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-37, November.
    8. Elizabeth Evered, 2016. "The role of the urban landscape in restoring mental health in Sheffield, UK: service user perspectives," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 678-694, August.
    9. Yu Wu & Zhixiong Zhuo & Qunyue Liu & Kunyong Yu & Qitang Huang & Jian Liu, 2021. "The Relationships between Perceived Design Intensity, Preference, Restorativeness and Eye Movements in Designed Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Zhenghui Li & Fanqi Zou & Yong Tan & Jinhui Zhu, 2021. "Does Financial Excess Support Land Urbanization—An Empirical Study of Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruochen Ma & Yuxin Luo & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Sdrali, Despina & Chazapi, Katerina, 2007. "Cultural Tourism In A Greek Insular Community: The Residents’ Perspective," MPRA Paper 6368, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sangui Wang & Lijuan Zheng, 2024. "The Impacts of the Poverty Alleviation Relocation Program (PARP) on Households’ Education Investment: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Yanling Li & Mengxin Wang & Gaoke Liao & Junxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Spillover Effect and Threshold Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Farmers’ Income Growth—Based on Provincial Data of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Ruoshi Zhang & Weiyue Duan & Zhikai Zheng, 2024. "Multimodal Quantitative Research on the Emotional Attachment Characteristics between People and the Built Environment Based on the Immersive VR Eye-Tracking Experiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Octavian Barna & Cristian Serea, 2017. "Historical Monuments As Tourist’S Attractions In Europe," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 23(23), pages 1-8, June.
    8. Dinghuan Yuan & Jiaxin Li & Qiuxiang Li & Yang Fu, 2024. "Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Simulation: Strategic Governance in the Redevelopment of the Urban Village in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Wei Li & Bao-Jie He & Jinda Qi & Jianwen Dong, 2018. "Water Conservation Scenic Spots in China: Developing the Tourism Potential of Hydraulic Projects and Water Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Yue Zhang & Guihua Liu & Zhixing Ma & Xin Deng & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2022. "The Influence of Land Attachment on Land Abandonment from the Perspective of Generational Difference: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Penz, Elfriede, 2009. "Social distance between residents and international tourists--Implications for international business," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 457-469, October.
    12. Huxiao Zhu & Xiangjun Ou & Zhen Yang & Yiwen Yang & Hongxin Ren & Le Tang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Land Urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Frey, Nicole & George, Richard, 2010. "Responsible tourism management: The missing link between business owners' attitudes and behaviour in the Cape Town tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 621-628.
    14. Chi-Hua Wu & Yu-Lin Chao & Jia-Ting Xiong & Ding-Bang Luh, 2022. "Gamification of Culture: A Strategy for Cultural Preservation and Local Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Kexi Xu & Hui Gao & Jieyu Su & Haijun Bao & Bingqian Zhan & Chun Jiang & Liuzhao Chen, 2022. "Accommodation and Avoidance: Functional Conflict Theory (FCT)-Based Governance Logic of Resettled Community Conflict in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Sio Kim & Jaeseong Lee & Youngsuk Kim, 2024. "Evaluation of Urban Traditional Temples Using Cultural Tourism Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-36, July.
    17. Binglu Wu & Wenzhuo Liang & Jiening Wang & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions of Ecosystem Services: A Study from Three Topographic Areas in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Xue Bai & Zhaoyu Xie & Bart Julien Dewancker, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Affecting User Satisfaction in Poverty Alleviation Relocation Housing for Minorities through Post-Occupancy Evaluation: A Case Study of Pu’er," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Yu Wu & Zhixiong Zhuo & Qunyue Liu & Kunyong Yu & Qitang Huang & Jian Liu, 2021. "The Relationships between Perceived Design Intensity, Preference, Restorativeness and Eye Movements in Designed Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Jia Tao & Meng Yang & Jing Wu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Lakefront Landscape Spatial Quality and Public Sentiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-29, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:212-:d:1012415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.