IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5562-d809221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Design of Nature-Based Solutions: Usability of Tools for Water Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Borjana Bogatinoska

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Angelique Lansu

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Jean Hugé

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Stefan C. Dekker

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
    Department of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Participatory processes provide opportunities for water professionals such as scientists and policymakers and other stakeholders such as the local communities and farmers to meet, exchange information, deliberate, and share values. There is a diversity of rapidly evolving participatory methods, here defined, as tools for supporting the process of designing nature-based solutions (NbS) together with the stakeholders. However, this requires a systematic and informed selection to facilitate the adequate choice of tools, aligned to the requirements and context of the water professionals and the stakeholders for the design and deployment of NbS. Despite this, there is still little progress and knowledge accumulation on how to select the most context-appropriate tool(s). Consequently, in this research, we propose a stepwise framework for the use of participatory tools, which we categorize as: (i) tools used for defining the hydro-meteorological hazards (HMH) and its impact on stakeholders—knowledge tools (ii) tools used for co-designing NbS with stakeholders—co-creation tools and (iii) tools used for co-implementing the transition towards NbS—transition tools. We then apply and test this stepwise framework on the participatory processes used in eight brook catchments distributed in four countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, France, and the United Kingdom. The framework is designed in steps that would lead to respectively: selecting, classifying, mapping, and grading the participatory tools leading to an informed and systematic decision of a tool or suite of tools for the design and deployment of NbS with stakeholders. With the application of this framework, we see that among the water professionals: (1) knowledge tools are central in the problem definition stage, particularly with non-technical stakeholders; (2) most anticipated co-creation tools are e-Tools/Virtual tools and workshops; (3) transition tools favor visual tools as a way of enabling the transition towards management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Borjana Bogatinoska & Angelique Lansu & Jean Hugé & Stefan C. Dekker, 2022. "Participatory Design of Nature-Based Solutions: Usability of Tools for Water Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5562-:d:809221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera Ferreira & Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Loures & Dulce Antunes & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Ilse M. Voskamp & Claudia de Luca & Monserrat Budding Polo-Ballinas & Helena Hulsman & Reinder Brolsma, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions Tools for Planning Urban Climate Adaptation: State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Kaddoura, Saeed & El Khatib, Sameh, 2017. "Review of water-energy-food Nexus tools to improve the Nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 114-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koudoua Ferhati & Saliha Chouguiat Belmallem & Adriana Burlea-Schiopoiu, 2023. "The Role of the COVID-19 Crisis in Shaping Urban Planning for Improved Public Health: A Triangulated Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remme, Roy P. & Meacham, Megan & Pellowe, Kara E. & Andersson, Erik & Guerry, Anne D. & Janke, Benjamin & Liu, Lingling & Lonsdorf, Eric & Li, Meng & Mao, Yuanyuan & Nootenboom, Christopher & Wu, Tong, 2024. "Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Sebastiano Carbonara & Marco Faustoferri & Davide Stefano, 2021. "Real Estate Values and Urban Quality: A Multiple Linear Regression Model for Defining an Urban Quality Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Alessandro Arlati & Anne Rödl & Sopho Kanjaria-Christian & Jörg Knieling, 2021. "Stakeholder Participation in the Planning and Design of Nature-Based Solutions. Insights from CLEVER Cities Project in Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Hamed Tavakoli & Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali, 2021. "Urban Public Policy and the Formation of Dilapidated Abandoned Buildings in Historic Cities: Causes, Impacts and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Isabella Georgiou & Serena Caucci & Jonathan Clive Morris & Edeltraud Guenther & Peter Krebs, 2023. "Assessing the Potential of Water Reuse Uptake Through a Private–Public Partnership: a Practitioner’s Perspective," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 199-220, March.
    6. Yichao He & Anna Jorgensen & Qian Sun & Amy Corcoran & Maria Jesus Alfaro-Simmonds, 2022. "Negotiating Complexity: Challenges to Implementing Community-Led Nature-Based Solutions in England Pre- and Post-COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Mike Spiliotis & Dionissis Latinopoulos & Lampros Vasiliades & Kyriakos Rafailidis & Eleni Koutsokera & Ifigenia Kagalou, 2022. "Flexible Goal Programming for Supporting Lake Karla’s (Greece) Sustainable Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Julia Wójcik-Madej & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2021. "An Assessment of the Ecological Landscape Quality (ELQ) of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) Based on Existing Elements of Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Rebekka Volk & Mihir Rambhia & Elias Naber & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Ananya Tiwari & Luís Campos Rodrigues & Frances E. Lucy & Salem Gharbia, 2022. "Building Climate Resilience in Coastal City Living Labs Using Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Zhang, Tong & Tan, Qian & Yu, Xiaoning & Zhang, Shan, 2020. "Synergy assessment and optimization for water-energy-food nexus: Modeling and application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Junlian Gao & Xiangyang Xu & Guiying Cao & Yurii M. Ermoliev & Tatiana Y. Ermolieva & Elena A. Rovenskaya, 2018. "Optimizing Regional Food and Energy Production under Limited Water Availability through Integrated Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Israa H. Mahmoud & Eugenio Morello & Chiara Vona & Maria Benciolini & Iliriana Sejdullahu & Marina Trentin & Karmele Herranz Pascual, 2021. "Setting the Social Monitoring Framework for Nature-Based Solutions Impact: Methodological Approach and Pre-Greening Measurements in the Case Study from CLEVER Cities Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Hongfang Li & Huixiao Wang & Yaxue Yang & Ruxin Zhao, 2021. "Regional Coordination and Security of Water–Energy–Food Symbiosis in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Carmela Mariano & Marsia Marino, 2023. "The Climate-Proof Planning towards the Ecological Transition: Isola Sacra—Fiumicino (Italy) between Flood Risk and Urban Development Prospectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Marzio Galeotti, 2021. "On the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Is there Multivariate Convergence?," Working Papers 2021.06, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    20. Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rishi Pugazhendhi & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy & Vinoth Ramanathan & Senthilkumar Subramanian & Sachin Kumar & Kamalakannan Nandhagopal & , 2022. "Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5562-:d:809221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.