IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5117-d800882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Economic Analysis of Heating Solutions for Rural Residences in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenying Zhang

    (School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Jiaqi Wang

    (School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Meiyuan Yang

    (School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Kai Gong

    (Science and Technology Division, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Mei Yang

    (School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

Abstract

A spatial assessment is important to explore appropriate heating schemes for rural residences in China. Taking rural residences in six typical cities of China as the focus, four heating solutions, namely, coal-fired boiler heating systems (CBHS), wall-hung gas-fired boiler heating systems (GBHS), direct electric heating systems (DEHS), and air source heat pump systems (ASHPS), are compared and analyzed from the perspectives of primary energy consumption, environmental impact and heating costs. The results show that the primary energy consumption and the environmental impact can be significantly reduced by using solutions of GBHS and ASHPS in comparison with CBHS. DEHS has the most significant primary energy consumption and environmental impact and is less economical. The weighted environmental impact of GBHS is reduced by over 94% compared with that of CBHS, the weighted environmental impact of ASHPS is reduced by 8–23%, 35–39%, and 43–44% compared with that of CBHS for severe cold regions, cold regions, and hot-summer and cold-winter regions, respectively. The life cycle cost of GBHS is about 33% higher than that of CBHS for the six typical cities. The life cycle cost of ASHPS is about 33–57% higher than CBHS for severe cold regions, but not much difference or even less than CBHS for cold regions and hot-summer and cold-winter regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenying Zhang & Jiaqi Wang & Meiyuan Yang & Kai Gong & Mei Yang, 2022. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of Heating Solutions for Rural Residences in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5117-:d:800882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cabeza, Luisa F. & Rincón, Lídia & Vilariño, Virginia & Pérez, Gabriel & Castell, Albert, 2014. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 394-416.
    2. Chen, Han & Chen, Wenying, 2019. "Potential impact of shifting coal to gas and electricity for building sectors in 28 major northern cities of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1049-1061.
    3. Zhang, Qunli & Zhang, Lin & Nie, Jinzhe & Li, Yinlong, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of air source heat pump applied for space heating in northern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 533-542.
    4. Evans, Meredydd & Yu, Sha & Song, Bo & Deng, Qinqin & Liu, Jing & Delgado, Alison, 2014. "Building energy efficiency in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 243-251.
    5. Hakkaki-Fard, Ali & Eslami-Nejad, Parham & Aidoun, Zine & Ouzzane, Mohamed, 2015. "A techno-economic comparison of a direct expansion ground-source and an air-source heat pump system in Canadian cold climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 49-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viktoria Mannheim & Károly Nehéz & Salman Brbhan & Péter Bencs, 2023. "Primary Energy Resources and Environmental Impacts of Various Heating Systems Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Leandra Vanbaelinghem & Andrea Costantino & Florian Grassauer & Nathan Pelletier, 2024. "Alternative Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System Considerations for Reducing Energy Use and Emissions in Egg Industries in Temperate and Continental Climates: A Systematic Review o," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-35, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyang Hou & Shuai Zhong & Jian’an Zhao, 2022. "A Critical Review on Decarbonizing Heating in China: Pathway Exploration for Technology with Multi-Sector Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Rongjiang Ma & Yu Fu & Mengsi Deng & Xingli Ding & Jill Baumgartner & Ming Shan & Xudong Yang, 2020. "Measurement of Personal Experienced Temperature Variations in Rural Households Using Wearable Monitors: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Dai, Baomin & Liu, Xiao & Liu, Shengchun & Wang, Dabiao & Meng, Chenyang & Wang, Qi & Song, Yifan & Zou, Tonghua, 2022. "Life cycle performance evaluation of cascade-heating high temperature heat pump system for waste heat utilization: Energy consumption, emissions and financial analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    4. Liu, Xuetao & Hu, Yusheng & Wang, Qifan & Yao, Liang & Li, Minxia, 2021. "Energetic, environmental and economic comparative analyses of modified transcritical CO2 heat pump system to replace R134a system for home heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Shao, Suola & Zhang, Huan & Fan, Xianwang & You, Shijun & Wang, Yaran & Wei, Shen, 2021. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of the air source heat pump system with direct-condensation radiant heating panel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Dai, Baomin & Feng, Yining & Liu, Shengchun & Yao, Xiaole & Zhang, Jianing & Wang, Bowen & Wang, Dabiao, 2023. "Dual pressure condensation heating high temperature heat pump using eco-friendly working fluid mixtures for industrial heating processes: 4E analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Li, Ke & Yuan, Weihong & Li, Jianglong & Ai, Hongshan, 2021. "Effects of time-dependent environmental regulations on air pollution: Evidence from the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan region, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Burek, Jasmina & Nutter, Darin W., 2019. "A life cycle assessment-based multi-objective optimization of the purchased, solar, and wind energy for the grocery, perishables, and general merchandise multi-facility distribution center network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1427-1446.
    9. Guozhong Zheng & Wentao Bu, 2018. "Review of Heating Methods for Rural Houses in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    11. Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas & Luis M. López-González & César García-Lozano, 2020. "Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings in Cold Mediterranean Zones Using Optimized Thermal Envelope Insulation Thicknesses: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-34, March.
    12. Sungwoo Lee & Sungho Tae & Seungjun Roh & Taehyung Kim, 2015. "Green Template for Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings Based on Building Information Modeling: Focus on Embodied Environmental Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Patricia González-Vallejo & Radu Muntean & Jaime Solís-Guzmán & Madelyn Marrero, 2020. "Carbon Footprint of Dwelling Construction in Romania and Spain. A Comparative Analysis with the OERCO2 Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Yuan, Zhipeng & Liu, Qi & Luo, Baojun & Li, Zhenming & Fu, Jianqin & Chen, Jingwei, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of different oil flooded compression enhanced vapor injection cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 553-560.
    15. Roux, Charlotte & Schalbart, Patrick & Assoumou, Edi & Peuportier, Bruno, 2016. "Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 619-629.
    16. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    17. Zhou, Chaohui & Ni, Long & Li, Jun & Lin, Zeri & Wang, Jun & Fu, Xuhui & Yao, Yang, 2019. "Air-source heat pump heating system with a new temperature and hydraulic-balance control strategy: A field experiment in a teaching building," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 148-161.
    18. Soheil Kavian & Mohsen Saffari Pour & Ali Hakkaki-Fard, 2019. "Optimized Design of the District Heating System by Considering the Techno-Economic Aspects and Future Weather Projection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Li, Meng & Jin, Tianyu & Liu, Shenglong & Zhou, Shaojie, 2021. "The cost of clean energy transition in rural China: Evidence based on marginal treatment effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Antonello Monsù Scolaro & Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Downcycling and Upcycling in Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Pre-Existing Buildings: Re-Designing Technological Performances in an Environmental Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5117-:d:800882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.