IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4778-d795179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy: Illusion or First Step towards a Sustainable Economy: A Physico-Economic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gunter Stephan

    (Steering Committee of the National Research Program, Sustainable Economy (NRP73), Swiss National Science Foundation, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland)

Abstract

“A circular economy is one that is regenerative by design and aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times, distinguishing between technical and biological cycles. This new economic model seeks to ultimately decouple global economic development from finite resource consumption”, states the widely used definition of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. This definition conveys two messages. First, it acknowledges that economic activities need natural inputs (energy and material) and generate outputs in the form of waste as well as emissions. Second, it embodies the promise that, through technological innovations, human ingenuity and the market, a full decoupling of the economy from nature can be reached. Obviously both messages are not consistent with each other. Analyzing these issues through the lens of a transdisciplinary approach, which combines insight from thermodynamics with conventional economic theory, is the purpose of this paper. By using such physico-economic perspective, it is argued that not any kind of a circular economy is sustainable. Therefore, indicators are required through which it can be assured that a particular fashion of a circular economy reduces both environmental and social harm.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunter Stephan, 2022. "Circular Economy: Illusion or First Step towards a Sustainable Economy: A Physico-Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4778-:d:795179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faber, Malte & Proops, John & Ruth, Matthias & Michaelis, Peter, 1990. "Economy-environment interactions in the long-run: a neo-Austrian approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 27-55, April.
    2. T. R. Beard & Gabriel A. Lozada, 1999. "Economics, Entropy and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1811.
    3. Jun Yan & Lianyong Feng & Artem Denisov & Alina Steblyanskaya & Jan-Pieter Oosterom, 2020. "Complexity theory for the modern Chinese economy from an information entropy perspective: Modeling of economic efficiency and growth potential," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Benjamin Megevand & Wen-Jun Cao & Francesco Di Maio & Peter Rem, 2022. "Circularity in Practice: Review of Main Current Approaches and Strategic Propositions for an Efficient Circular Economy of Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Matthias Ruth, 1995. "Thermodynamic implications for natural resource extraction and technical change in U.S. copper mining," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 187-206, September.
    6. Robert Ayres, 1995. "Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 207-230, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayres, Robert U., 1998. "Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 189-209, August.
    2. Toman, Michael & Pezzey, John C., 2002. "The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles," RFF Working Paper Series dp-02-03, Resources for the Future.
    3. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    4. Ruth, Matthias, 1995. "Technology change in US iron and steel production : Implications for material and energy use, and CO2 emissions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 199-214, September.
    5. Funk, Matt, 2008. "On the Problem of Sustainable Economic Development: A Theoretical Solution to this Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 19025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2008.
    6. Stern, David I., 1997. "Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: A neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 197-215, June.
    7. Jesús Ramos-Martín, 2003. "Empirismo en economía ecológica: una visión desde la teoría de los sistemas complejos," Revista de Economia Critica, Asociacion de Economia Critica, vol. 1, pages 75-93.
    8. Diwekar, Urmila, 2005. "Green process design, industrial ecology, and sustainability: A systems analysis perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 215-235.
    9. Quentin Couix, 2018. "From Methodology to Practice (and Back): Georgescu-Roegen's Philosophy of Economics and the Flow-Fund Model," Post-Print halshs-01854031, HAL.
    10. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2010. "Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1765-1776, July.
    11. Patrizia Ghisellini & Ivana Quinto & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2024. "Exploring environmental and social performances of circular start‐ups: An orientation and certification assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3222-3241, May.
    12. Krysiak, Frank C. & Krysiak, Daniela, 2003. "Production, consumption, and general equilibrium with physical constraints," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 513-538, November.
    13. Heinzel, Christoph, 2006. "Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis: The problem of qualitative change, its methodical implications and analytical treatment," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 10/06, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    14. Beltrán-Esteve, Mercedes & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., 2017. "Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 240-252.
    15. Arif, Asma & Minh Vu, Hieu & Cong, Ma & Hon Wei, Leow & Islam, Md. Monirul & Niedbała, Gniewko, 2022. "Natural resources commodity prices volatility and economic performance: Evaluating the role of green finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Cleveland, Cutler J. & Ruth, Matthias, 1997. "When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process?: A survey of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen's contribution to ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 203-223, September.
    17. Rechberger, H. & Graedel, T. E., 2002. "The contemporary European copper cycle: statistical entropy analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 59-72, August.
    18. Christoph Heinzel, 2013. "Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(2), pages 251-271.
    19. Speck, Stefan, 1997. "A neo-Austrian five process model with resource extraction and pollution abatement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 91-103, May.
    20. Ruth, Matthias, 1998. "Dematerialization in five US metals sectors: implications for energy use and CO2 emissions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4778-:d:795179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.