IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4111-d783390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Coupling Coordination Degree of Industrial Innovation Ecosystem—From the Perspective of Green Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohua Yu

    (College of Management and Economics, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Yuan Qi

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Longzhen Yu

    (College of Management and Economics, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Yuanyuan He

    (College of Management and Economics, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, China)

Abstract

This paper takes the industrial innovation ecosystem as the research object and the realization of green development as the goal, discussing the temporal and spatial evolution of coupling coordination degree of industrial innovation ecosystem from the perspective of system view. Based on the data of 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2021, the spatial and temporal pattern distribution and spatial connection evolution of synergy among the three subsystems of industrial innovation ecosystem are studied by using coupling coordination degree model, trend surface model and gravity model. It is found that during the study period, the coupling relationship between the three subsystems is in a dynamic upward state. The regions with high values and rapid growth are distributed in the key areas of the national economic development strategy. At the same time, they have the characteristics of “positive U-shaped first and then inverted U-shaped” in the east-west and north-south directions; the spatial connection strength of coupling coordination degree shows that the spatial connection strength of the eastern region is significantly greater than that of the western region. With the improvement of spatial connection strength, a radial coupling network centered on Beijing Tianjin Tangshan region and the Yangtze River Delta is formed, which is of core significance to promote the coordinated development of industrial innovation ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohua Yu & Yuan Qi & Longzhen Yu & Yuanyuan He, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Coupling Coordination Degree of Industrial Innovation Ecosystem—From the Perspective of Green Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4111-:d:783390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balazs Lengyel & Loet Leydesdorff, 2011. "Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 677-693.
    2. Elisa Villani & Christian Lechner, 2021. "How to acquire legitimacy and become a player in a regional innovation ecosystem? The case of a young university," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1017-1045, August.
    3. Zhou Huiping & Yang Yuxin & Haoran Zhang, 2021. "How Does Knowledge Coupling Affect Firm’s Incremental Innovation? The Moderating Effects of Government Support Policies," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, November.
    4. Timo Mitze & Björn Alecke & Janina Reinkowski & Gerhard Untiedt, 2015. "Linking collaborative R&D strategies with the research and innovation performance of SMEs in peripheral regions: Do spatial and organizational choices make a difference?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 555-596, December.
    5. Xiaoke Zhao & Xuhui Ding & Liang Li, 2021. "Research on Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation and Green Transformation of Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Jing Zhang & Yuanyuan Lu & Xiangmin Zhang & Daqing Gong, 2021. "Unlocking the Sustainable Development Path of China’s Nonferrous Metal Industry Based on Collaborative Innovation," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, September.
    7. Lijie Feng & Jiarui Lu & Jinfeng Wang, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Enterprise Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Jun Yao & Huajing Li & Di Shang & Luyang Ding, 2021. "Evolution of the Industrial Innovation Ecosystem of Resource-Based Cities (RBCs): A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Zhao, Xin & Shang, Yuping & Song, Malin, 2020. "Industrial structure distortion and urban ecological efficiency from the perspective of green entrepreneurial ecosystems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Na Hou & Qianying Zhu & Jinlin Yang & Dahong Zhang & Wenwen Liu & Hong Chang, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Governance on the Development of Fishery Economy—The Intermediary Role of Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Xu Wang & Hong Fang & Fang Zhang & Siran Fang, 2018. "The Spatial Analysis of Regional Innovation Performance and Industry-University-Research Institution Collaborative Innovation—An Empirical Study of Chinese Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Burström, Thommie & Parida, Vinit & Lahti, Tom & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 85-95.
    13. Lee, In Hyeock & Hong, Eunsuk & Sun, Laixiang, 2013. "Regional knowledge production and entrepreneurial firm creation: Spatial Dynamic Analyses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2106-2115.
    14. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Dominika Mankowska & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Stanisław Minta & Tomasz Pilawka, 2020. "How do Clusters Foster Sustainable Development? An Analysis of EU Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuefeng Liu & Hanzhi Yu & Guowei Lai & Shuxiao Wang & Yuying Xie, 2022. "Imitation or Innovation? Research on the Path Selection of Enterprise Performance Improvement from the Perspective of Organizational Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Hongmei Chen & Songlin Cai, 2023. "Research on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Regional Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience—Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of 30 Provinces and Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Fabricia S. Rosa & Lorenzo Compagnucci & Rogerio J. Lunkes & Januário J. Monteiro, 2023. "Green innovation ecosystem and water performance in the food service industry: The effects of environmental management controls and digitalization," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5459-5476, December.
    4. Xin Wang, 2023. "Research on the Coupling Coordination Degree of Triple Helix of Government Guidance, Industrial Innovation and Scientific Research Systems: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hig:wpaper:98sti2019 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Imre Lengyel, 2011. "Types of competitiveness of Hungarian regions: agglomeration economies and endogenous regional development," ERSA conference papers ersa11p674, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Dorota Ciołek & Anna Golejewska & Adriana Zabłocka‐Abi Yaghi, 2022. "Innovation drivers in regions. Does urbanization matter?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1933-1960, December.
    4. Hanqiao Zhang, 2024. "Exit Spillovers of Foreign-invested Enterprises in Shenzhen's Electronics Manufacturing Industry," Papers 2404.18009, arXiv.org.
    5. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2023. "Artificial intelligence-driven scalability and its impact on the sustainability and valuation of traditional firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Regmi, Rupesh & Zhang, Zhuo & Zhang, Hongpeng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship strategy, natural resources management and sustainable performance: A study of an emerging market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    7. Baoting Peng & Xin Shen, 2024. "Does Environmental Regulation Affect Circular Economy Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Fredström, Ashkan & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim & Sjödin, David & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2022. "What is the Market Value of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? The Role of Innovativeness and Collaboration for Performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Reza Naghizadeh & Shaban Elahi & Manoochehr Manteghi & Sepehr Ghazinoory & Marina Ranga, 2015. "Through the magnifying glass: an analysis of regional innovation models based on co-word and meta-synthesis methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2481-2505, November.
    12. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Tsvetkova, Alexandra, 2016. "Do diversity, creativity and localized competition promote endogenous firm formation? Evidence from a high-tech US industry," MPRA Paper 72349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Lee, Young Hoon & Kim, YoungJun, 2016. "Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 93-105.
    15. Rui Zhang & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2022. "Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Varga, Attila & Sebestyén, Tamás, 2015. "Innováció Kelet-Közép-Európában. Az EU keretprogramjaiban való részvétel szerepe az innovációs teljesítményben [Innovation in Central East Europe. The role played in innovation performance by parti," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 881-908.
    17. Dong, Hao & Zheng, Yingrong & Tang, Yuhong, 2024. "Impact of FinTech on the industrial structural transformation: Evidence from China's resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Xiao Han & Yining Chen & Hehua Zhao, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution, Influencing Factors, and Driving Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation Performance Disparities: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 263-286, March.
    21. Loet Leydesdorff & Han Woo Park & Balazs Lengyel, 2014. "A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 27-35, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4111-:d:783390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.