IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2961-d763301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Project Management: Evaluation of Relationship-Specific Risks and Risk Determinants Threatening to Achieve the Intended Benefit of Interorganizational Cooperation in Engineering Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Krechowicz

    (Faculty of Management and Computer Modelling, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

Nowadays, we can observe a growing number of investment projects in the construction industry and environmental engineering, as well as a growing interest in socially responsible projects aiming to contribute to sustainable development. Interorganizational cooperation in engineering projects is associated with many opportunities and risks that continue to be a challenge for today’s world. The aim of this work is to identify and assess relationship-specific risks and risk determinants threatening to achieve the intended benefit of interorganizational cooperation and to develop assumptions for the risk management model in such projects. It will support sustainable project management in interorganizational engineering projects and increase their sustainability. In this work, 18 risks and 28 risk determinants were identified. Risks’ frequency of occurrence, consequences, possibility of detection and Risk Priority Numbers as well as the significance of risk determinants were assessed based on the data gathered from 12,352 interorganizational projects from 100 Polish companies. It was found that self-interest orientation, hiding internal problems and/or problems related to the joint venture, unfavourable and imprecise contract, and lack of a good project coordinator pose the highest risk in interorganizational engineering projects. The study revealed that the highest Risk Priority Numbers in interorganizational projects were generally obtained for construction projects, lower for socially responsible projects taken by engineering companies, and the lowest for environmental engineering projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Krechowicz, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Project Management: Evaluation of Relationship-Specific Risks and Risk Determinants Threatening to Achieve the Intended Benefit of Interorganizational Cooperation in Engineering Pr," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2961-:d:763301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Krechowicz & Katarzyna Kiliańska, 2021. "Risk and Opportunity Assessment Model for CSR Initiatives in the Face of Coronavirus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Maria Krechowicz & Adam Krechowicz, 2021. "Risk Assessment in Energy Infrastructure Installations by Horizontal Directional Drilling Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Maria Lourdes Arco-Castro & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2020. "Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ali Foroutan Mirhosseini & Kelly Pitera & James Odeck & Morten Welde, 2022. "Sustainable Project Management: Reducing the Risk of Cost Inaccuracy Using a PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Arnold Bernaciak & Małgorzata Halaburda & Anna Bernaciak, 2021. "The Construction Industry as the Subject of Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (the Case of Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Robert Close & Martin Loosemore, 2014. "Breaking down the site hoardings: attitudes and approaches to community consultation during construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 816-828, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Fernandes & Joana Domingues & Anabela Tereso & Camilo Micán & Madalena Araújo, 2022. "Risk Management in University–Industry R&D Collaboration Programs: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joo, Mohammad Hashemi & Lawrence, Edward & Parhizgari, Ali, 2021. "Securities litigation risk and board gender diversity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Alejandra García-Sánchez, 2021. "Different Leaders in a COVID-19 Scenario: CEO Altruism and Generous Discourse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & María-del-Carmen Granada-Abarzuza, 2021. "The Influence of Female Directors and Institutional Pressures on Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms in Latin America," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Jingchen Zhao, 2021. "Reimagining Corporate Social Responsibility in the Era of COVID-19: Embedding Resilience and Promoting Corporate Social Competence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Beatriz Garcia-Ortega & Javier Galan-Cubillo & Blanca de-Miguel-Molina, 2022. "CSR and CEO’s Moral Reasoning in the Automotive Industry in the Era of COVID-19," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    6. Agnieszka Kwarcinska, 2023. "Implementation of the Employee-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility Activities vs the Preferences of the Employed," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 522-539.
    7. Kamal Dhawan & John E. Tookey & Ali GhaffarianHoseini & Mani Poshdar, 2023. "Using Transport to Quantify the Impact of Vertical Integration on the Construction Supply Chain: A New Zealand Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Rubén Dario Acosta-Velásquez & Jeffrey León-Pulido & Alexander García-Pérez & William Stive Fajardo-Moreno & Leonardo Espinosa-Leal, 2022. "Contemporary Management Practice Applying the Dynamic Absorptive Capacity Measurement Model (PM 4 AC) for Improved Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Adam Krechowicz & Maria Krechowicz & Katarzyna Poczeta, 2022. "Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-41, December.
    10. Huidong Sun & Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Naveed Ahmad & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Guping Cheng & Malik Zia-Ud-Din & Qinghua Fu, 2020. "CSR, Co-Creation and Green Consumer Loyalty: Are Green Banking Initiatives Important? A Moderated Mediation Approach from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Matos, Stelvia & Viardot, Eric & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Geels, Frank W. & Xiong, Yu, 2022. "Innovation and climate change: A review and introduction to the special issue," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Dalilis Escobar Rivera & Maria Rosa Terradellas Piferrer & Maria Helena Benito Mundet, 2021. "Measuring Territorial Social Responsibility and Sustainability Using the EFQM Excellence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Johnsson, Filip & Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Ahlbäck, Anders & Gustavsson, Mathias, 2020. "The framing of a sustainable development goals assessment in decarbonizing the construction industry – Avoiding “Greenwashing”," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Maria Krechowicz & Adam Krechowicz & Lech Lichołai & Artur Pawelec & Jerzy Zbigniew Piotrowski & Anna Stępień, 2022. "Reduction of the Risk of Inaccurate Prediction of Electricity Generation from PV Farms Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Madhura Rao & Nadia Bernaz & Alie Boer, 2024. "Holding Retail Corporations Accountable for Food Waste: A Due Diligence Framework Informed by Business and Human Rights Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 679-689, September.
    16. Čater, Tomaž & Čater, Barbara & Milić, Patricia & Žabkar, Vesna, 2023. "Drivers of corporate environmental and social responsibility practices: A comparison of two moderated mediation models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Maria Krechowicz & Katarzyna Kiliańska, 2021. "Risk and Opportunity Assessment Model for CSR Initiatives in the Face of Coronavirus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Arnold Bernaciak & Małgorzata Halaburda & Anna Bernaciak, 2021. "The Construction Industry as the Subject of Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (the Case of Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Shuchi Gupta & Nishad Nawaz & Abhishek Tripathi & Saqib Muneer & Naveed Ahmad, 2021. "Using Social Media as a Medium for CSR Communication, to Induce Consumer–Brand Relationship in the Banking Sector of a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2961-:d:763301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.