IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2681-d758264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Planning of Manufacturing Process Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Berend Denkena

    (Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany)

  • Marcel Wichmann

    (Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany)

  • Simon Kettelmann

    (Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany)

  • Jonas Matthies

    (Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany)

  • Leon Reuter

    (Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany)

Abstract

Production planning is a critical step for the implementation of sustainable production. It is necessary to consider energy and resource efficiency in all planning phases to promote sustainable production. In this paper, an approach for environmental impact assessment in all phases of process chain planning supported by process models is presented. The level of detail of the assessment is determined based on the level of detail of the planning phase. During the assessment, consumption of energy and resources is considered. This approach aims to align planning phases with the objective of sustainable production. In rough planning, the approach allows the selection of an ecologically favorable process chain. In detailed planning, process parameters can be selected based on their ecological sustainability. The approach can be integrated into the planning of process chains in order to consider ecological factors throughout all planning phases. The approach is evaluated by using an exemplary use case. The results indicate that rough planning under the consideration of uncertainties can form a reasonable prediction about resource efficiency for possible manufacturing routes. By systematically selecting a resource-efficient process chain, energy savings of up to 21% can be achieved for the presented use case.

Suggested Citation

  • Berend Denkena & Marcel Wichmann & Simon Kettelmann & Jonas Matthies & Leon Reuter, 2022. "Ecological Planning of Manufacturing Process Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2681-:d:758264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bilgen, S., 2014. "Structure and environmental impact of global energy consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 890-902.
    2. Biel, K. & Glock, C. H., 2016. "Systematic literature review of decision support models for energy-efficient production planning," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 83071, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zixia Xiang & Yanhong Yin & Yuanwen He, 2018. "A Microeconomic Methodology to Evaluate Energy Efficiency by Consumption Behaviors and Strategies to Improve Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Beck, Fabian G. & Biel, Konstantin & Glock, Christoph H., 2019. "Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 399-410.
    4. Fan Xiao & Zhi-Hua Hu & Ke-Xin Wang & Pei-Hua Fu, 2015. "Spatial Distribution of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission of Regional Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Wei Zheng & Patrick Paul Walsh, 2018. "Urbanization, trade openness, and air pollution: a provincial level analysis of China," Working Papers 201818, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    6. Ghorbanzadeh, Masoumeh & Ranjbar, Mohammad, 2023. "Energy-aware production scheduling in the flow shop environment under sequence-dependent setup times, group scheduling and renewable energy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 519-537.
    7. Dejian Yu & Sun Meng, 2018. "An overview of biomass energy research with bibliometric indicators," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(4), pages 576-590, June.
    8. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria, 2020. "Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 168-190.
    9. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    10. K. M. Kamna & Prerna Gautam & Chandra K. Jaggi, 0. "Sustainable inventory policy for an imperfect production system with energy usage and volume agility," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-9.
    11. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    12. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Anvari, Simin & Szlęk, Andrzej & Arteconi, Alessia & Desideri, Umberto & Rosen, Marc A., 2023. "Comparative study of steam injection modes for a proposed biomass-driven cogeneration cycle: Performance improvement and CO2 emission reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    14. Sven Schulz & Udo Buscher & Liji Shen, 2020. "Multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling with variable discrete production speed levels and time-of-use energy prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(9), pages 1315-1343, November.
    15. Wichmann, Matthias Gerhard & Johannes, Christoph & Spengler, Thomas Stefan, 2019. "Energy-oriented Lot-Sizing and Scheduling considering energy storages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 204-214.
    16. Saleh, Layla & Mezher, Toufic, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of sustainability and externality costs of water desalination production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Azam, Muhammad & Khan, Abdul Qayyum & Zaman, Khalid & Ahmad, Mehboob, 2015. "Factors determining energy consumption: Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1123-1131.
    18. Qian Zhou & Naota Hanasaki & Shinichiro Fujimori & Yoshimitsu Masaki & Yasuaki Hijioka, 2018. "Economic consequences of global climate change and mitigation on future hydropower generation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 77-90, March.
    19. Xiaran Zhang & Xiaoxia Rong & Meng Cai & Qingchun Meng, 2019. "Collaborative Optimization of Emissions and Abatement Costs for Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases from the Perspective of Energy Structure: An Empirical Analysis in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Lejla Terzić, 2023. "Why is the transition to a green economy important for achieving sustainability? A review of some theoretical approaches and empirical research presented in the literature," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 307-332.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2681-:d:758264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.