IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2527-d755822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Mortar with/without Nano Silica and Nano Alumina

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmood Hunar Dheyaaldin

    (Civil Engineering Department, Cyprus International University, Nicosia 99010, North Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah

    (Civil Engineering Department, Cyprus International University, Nicosia 99010, North Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Radhwan Alzeebaree

    (Akre Technical Institute, Duhok Polytechnic University, Duhok 42004, Iraq
    Civil Engineering Department, Nawroz University, Duhok 42002, Iraq)

Abstract

The current study is aimed to evaluate the effect of nanomaterials (nano alumina (NA) and nano silica (NS) on the mechanical and durability performance of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated mortars (FRAAM). Polypropylene fiber (PPF) was added to the binders at 0.5% and 1% of the volume of the alkali-activated mortar (AAM). Design-expert software was used to provide the central composite design (CCD) for mix proportions. This method categorizes variables into three stages. The number of mixes was created and evaluated with varied proportions of variables. The primary binders in this experiment were 50% fly ash (FA) and 50% ground granulated blast slag (GGBS). The alkali-activated solution to binder ratio was 0.5, and the sodium hydroxide (NaOH) concentration was 12 molarity. The sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio was 2.5. The cubic specimens and prisms were evaluated in an ambient atmosphere at 23 + 3 °C room temperature at the ages of 7 and 28 days. The mechanical performance of AAM was indicated through evaluation of the compressive and flexural strength, flowability, and unit weight of the alkali activator mortar. In addition, the durability performance and microstructure analysis were also evaluated. The experiments demonstrated that the AAM without fibers and nanomaterials had a higher flow rate than the other mixtures. However, the flowability of all mixtures was acceptable. The highest compressive strength was deducted through the use of 2% NA and higher flexural tensile strength was obtained for mixtures included 1% NS and 0.5% PPF. The lower water absorption was noted through the combination of 2% nano silica and 1% polypropylene fiber. Whereas, the combination of 2% nano silica, 1% nano alumina, and 0.5% polypropylene fiber had the lower sorptivity. In addition, the microstructure analysis indicated that the nanomaterials significantly improved the matrix and the porosity of the matrix was considerably reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmood Hunar Dheyaaldin & Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah & Radhwan Alzeebaree, 2022. "Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Mortar with/without Nano Silica and Nano Alumina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2527-:d:755822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemn Unis Ahmed & Azad A. Mohammed & Serwan Rafiq & Ahmed S. Mohammed & Amir Mosavi & Nadhim Hamah Sor & Shaker M. A. Qaidi, 2021. "Compressive Strength of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Composites: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-38, December.
    2. Rabii Hattaf & Abdelilah Aboulayt & Azzedine Samdi & Nouha Lahlou & Mohamed Ouazzani Touhami & Moussa Gomina & Redouane Moussa, 2021. "Reusing Geopolymer Waste from Matrices Based on Metakaolin or Fly Ash for the Manufacture of New Binder Geopolymeric Matrices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Iman Faridmehr & Moncef L. Nehdi & Ghasan Fahim Huseien & Mohammad Hajmohammadian Baghban & Abdul Rahman Mohd Sam & Hassan Amer Algaifi, 2021. "Experimental and Informational Modeling Study of Sustainable Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Wanli & Wang, Baomin & Zhang, Shipeng, 2024. "Dispersion, properties, and mechanisms of nanotechnology-modified alkali-activated materials: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aryan Far H. Sherwani & Khaleel H. Younis & Ralf W. Arndt & Kypros Pilakoutas, 2022. "Performance of Self-Compacted Geopolymer Concrete Containing Fly Ash and Slag as Binders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Jacob O. Ikotun & Gbenga E. Aderinto & Makungu M. Madirisha & Valentine Y. Katte, 2024. "Geopolymer Cement in Pavement Applications: Bridging Sustainability and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Mahmoud Ziada & Savaş Erdem & Yosra Tammam & Serenay Kara & Roberto Alonso González Lezcano, 2021. "The Effect of Basalt Fiber on Mechanical, Microstructural, and High-Temperature Properties of Fly Ash-Based and Basalt Powder Waste-Filled Sustainable Geopolymer Mortar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Chiya Y. Rahimzadeh & Ahmed Salih & Azeez A. Barzinjy, 2022. "Systematic Multiscale Models to Predict the Compressive Strength of Cement Paste as a Function of Microsilica and Nanosilica Contents, Water/Cement Ratio, and Curing Ages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Mohamed Amin & Ibrahim Saad Agwa & Nuha Mashaan & Shaker Mahmood & Mahmoud H. Abd-Elrahman, 2023. "Investigation of the Physical Mechanical Properties and Durability of Sustainable Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Recycled Waste Glass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Mohammad Masfiqul Alam Bhuiyan & Ahmed Hammad, 2024. "Engineering and Design for Sustainable Construction: A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2527-:d:755822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.