IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2496-d755749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Network Structure of Ecotourism Flow in Zhangjiajie

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoming Liu

    (College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410018, China)

  • Mei Xu

    (College of Tourism, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410018, China)

  • Huiling Zhou

    (School of Economics, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410018, China)

Abstract

Tourism flow is an important monitoring indicator for the industrial operation of ecotourism destinations, crucial in its planning, development, and marketing. Based on the travel journal data of popular tourism websites, this paper analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution, network structure, and the coupling characteristics between ecotourism flow and traffic accessibility in Zhangjiajie using standard deviation ellipse, social network analysis, kernel density estimation, and a spatial coupling model. The main results are as follows: (1) In terms of time distribution, the ecotourism flow in Zhangjiajie is mainly short-term tourism, with significant seasonal differences. (2) In terms of spatial structure, the ecotourism flow in Zhangjiajie presents a polygonal distribution of “core-edge”, forming a dense distribution area of Wulingyuan–Tianmen Mountain–Huanglongdong ecotourism flow. (3) In terms of spatial and temporal distribution, the connection intensity between the core area of ecotourism flow in Zhangjiajie and other scenic spots increases as the tourism length of stay increases. However, the radiation scope is mainly in the surrounding ecotourism scenic spots. (4) The coupling degree of ecotourism flow and traffic accessibility in Zhangjiajie is high, but the coupling coordination degree remains low on the whole. In addition, there is a serious mismatch between ecotourism flow and traffic accessibility in Zhangjiajie.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoming Liu & Mei Xu & Huiling Zhou, 2022. "Analyzing the Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Network Structure of Ecotourism Flow in Zhangjiajie," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2496-:d:755749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina Safitri Zen & Mohd. Nazeri Saleh & Teuku Afrizal & Ummi Karomah Yaumidin & Prima Wahyu Titisari & Yani Hendrayani, 2021. "Quo vadis development: assessing the livelihood of indigenous people’s communities in Malaysia and the potential for community-based conservation effort," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6502-6523, April.
    2. Md. Anowar Hossain Bhuiyan & Chamhuri Siwar & Shaharuddin Mohamad Ismail, 2016. "Sustainability Measurement for Ecotourism Destination in Malaysia: A Study on Lake Kenyir, Terengganu," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1029-1045, September.
    3. Mark Everard & Gaurav Kataria & Smita Kumar & Nishikant Gupta, 2021. "Assessing livelihood-ecosystem interdependencies and natural resource governance in a tribally controlled region of India’s north-eastern middle Himalayas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7772-7790, May.
    4. Federica Buffa, 2015. "Young Tourists and Sustainability. Profiles, Attitudes, and Implications for Destination Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Siti Intan Nurdiana Wong Abdullah & Zaiton Samdin & Jo Ann Ho & Siew Imm Ng, 2020. "Sustainability of marine parks: Is knowledge–attitude–behaviour still relevant?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7357-7384, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qianqian Gong & Jiaming Li & Lingzhi Wu & Miner Zhu & Maoyu Luo & Jingyi Sun & Wenqing Fu & Renfeng Ma & Xianjun Liang, 2023. "Exploring Accessibility and Its Impact in the Mountain City: A Typical Case Study of Nyingchi City, Tibet Autonomous Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Philip R. Walsh & Rachel Dodds & Julianna Priskin & Jonathon Day & Oxana Belozerova, 2021. "The Corporate Responsibility Paradox: A Multi-National Investigation of Business Traveller Attitudes and Their Sustainable Travel Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Massoud Moslehpour & Pei-Kuan Lin & Shao-Chun Chiu & Yung-Yen Liu, 2021. "Mapping Generation Y Tourists’ E-Loyalty: A Sustainable Framework through Hierarchical Structure and Fuzzy Set Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Md. Hasanur Rahman & Liton Chandra Voumik & Md. Jamsedul Islam & Md. Abdul Halim & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2022. "Economic Growth, Energy Mix, and Tourism-Induced EKC Hypothesis: Evidence from Top Ten Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Dana Badau & Adela Badau, 2018. "The motric, Educational, Recreational and Satisfaction Impact of Adventure Education Activities in the Urban Tourism Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Mary-Ann Cooper & Raquel Camprubí & Erdogan Koc & Ralf Buckley, 2021. "Digital Destination Matching: Practices, Priorities and Predictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Gema Pérez-Tapia & Fernando Almeida-García & Pere Mercadé-Melé, 2021. "The “ Four Core Elements ” as a Measuring Instrument: From Simplicity to Complexity in Tourist Destination," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Josefa García Mestanza & Alfonso Cerezo Medina & Marco Antonio Cruz Morato, 2019. "A Model for Measuring Fair Labour Justice in Hotels: Design for the Spanish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Xiaocheng Vicky Zhang & Suk Ha Grace Chan, 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Makhabbat Ramazanova & Bartolomé Deyà Tortella & Anuarbek Kakabayev & Ana Maria Caldeira & Maria João Carneiro, 2023. "Do Sustainability Perceptions Affect Lake Destination Loyalty?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Miroslav D. Vujičić & James Kennell & Alastair Morrison & Viachaslau Filimonau & Ivana Štajner Papuga & Uglješa Stankov & Djordjije A. Vasiljević, 2020. "Fuzzy Modelling of Tourist Motivation: An Age-Related Model for Sustainable, Multi-Attraction, Urban Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Neringa Vilkaite-Vaitone & Vilma Tamuliene, 2023. "Unveiling the Untapped Potential of Green Consumption in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Miha Lesjak & Emil Juvan & Eva Podovšovnik, 2020. "Erasmus+ Mobility: Empirical Insights into Erasmus+ Tourists’ Behaviour," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 35-50.
    14. Kristína Pompurová & Radka Marčeková & Ľubica Šebová & Jana Sokolová & Matej Žofaj, 2018. "Volunteer Tourism as a Sustainable Form of Tourism—The Case of Organized Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Riyan Mohammed Sahahiri & Amy L. Griffin & Qian (Chayn) Sun, 2023. "Investigating Ecotourism Opportunities Measurements in a Complex Adaptive System: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Zeinab Asadpourian & Mehdi Rahimian & Saeed Gholamrezai, 2020. "SWOT-AHP-TOWS Analysis for Sustainable Ecotourism Development in the Best Area in Lorestan Province, Iran," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 289-315, November.
    17. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    18. Marvin Ruano & Chien-Yi Huang & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen & Hong-Quan Le & Linh-Chi Tran, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability in Belize’s Ecotourism Sector: A Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy DEMATEL Investigation of Key Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-29, June.
    19. Hejie Wei & Jiaxin Zheng & Dong Xue & Xiaobin Dong & Mengxue Liu & Yali Zhang, 2022. "Identifying the Relationship between Livelihoods and Land Ecosystem Services Using a Coupled Model: A Case Study in the “One River and Two Tributaries” Region of Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Giachino, Chiara & Bollani, Luigi & Truant, Elisa & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2022. "Urban area and nature-based solution: Is this an attractive solution for Generation Z?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2496-:d:755749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.