IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2484-d755314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Soil Macrofauna and Its Coupling Relationship with Environmental Factors in the Loess Area of Northern Shaanxi

Author

Listed:
  • Yongwei Zhou

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Changhai Liu

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Jujube, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Ning Ai

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Jujube, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Xianghui Tuo

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Zhiyong Zhang

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Rui Gao

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Jiafeng Qin

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

  • Caixia Yuan

    (College of Life Science, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China)

Abstract

Even with the in-depth implementation of forestry ecological projects, such as restoring farmland to forest (grass) in the loess area of northern Shaanxi, the characteristics of soil macrofauna communities and their coupling relationship with environmental factors after vegetation restoration in the study area are yet obscure. However, the soil macrofauna community characteristics are of great significance for evaluating the effectiveness of vegetation restoration in the study area. Therefore, the study aims to reveal the characteristics of the soil macrofauna community and their coupling relationships with the environment in the loess area of northern Shaanxi. In this study, all organisms of the five typical vegetation types in the study area were collected by manual sorting ( Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest (M), Robinia pseudoacacia (P), Populus simonii (S), Populus hopeiensis (H) and Hippophae rhamnoides (R)), and the adjacent abandoned grassland (G) was used as a control group. The group number and the individual number of soil macrofauna of different vegetation types in the study area and their coupling relationships with environmental factors are studied, and the following conclusions were drawn. (1) The study shows that there are certain differences in the environmental factors of different vegetation types in the study area, which include the significant differences in the alkaline nitrogen content of various vegetation types ( p < 0.05). (2) The effects of different vegetation on soil macrofauna community were different. There were no significant differences in the soil macrofauna community structure between Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest, Robinia pseudoacacia , Populus simonii and Populus hopeiensis , but there was a large difference from that of the abandoned grasslands. The community density of soil macrofauna in Armeniaca sibirica and Populus simonii mixed forest and Populus simonii were significantly higher than that in the abandoned grassland ( p < 0.05), but the other indexes showed no significant differences. The Shannon–Wiener index of Robinia pseudoacacia and Populus hopeiensis were much lower than that of the abandoned grassland ( p < 0.05). (3) The diversity of soil macrofauna communities was mainly affected by pH, alkaline nitrogen, potassium available, vegetation coverage and litter production. (4) Different groups of soil macrofauna were closely related and reacted differently to environmental factors, and vegetation coverage, litter production and alkaline nitrogen content were the key factors affecting the composition of soil macrofauna communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongwei Zhou & Changhai Liu & Ning Ai & Xianghui Tuo & Zhiyong Zhang & Rui Gao & Jiafeng Qin & Caixia Yuan, 2022. "Characteristics of Soil Macrofauna and Its Coupling Relationship with Environmental Factors in the Loess Area of Northern Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2484-:d:755314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Bing & Gao, Peng & Niu, Xiang & Sun, Jianni, 2017. "Policy-driven China’s Grain to Green Program: Implications for ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 38-47.
    2. Richard D. Bardgett & Wim H. van der Putten, 2014. "Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 505-511, November.
    3. Gerlinde B. De Deyn & Ciska E. Raaijmakers & H. Rik Zoomer & Matty P. Berg & Peter C. de Ruiter & Herman A. Verhoef & T. Martijn Bezemer & Wim H. van der Putten, 2003. "Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6933), pages 711-713, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huayong Zhang & Qingxia Lin & Tousheng Huang & Yu Feng & Shijia Zhang, 2022. "Distribution Patterns of Soil Fauna in Different Forest Habitat Types of North Hebei Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Yinhong Hu & Weiwei Yu & Bowen Cui & Yuanyuan Chen & Hua Zheng & Xiaoke Wang, 2021. "Pavement Overrides the Effects of Tree Species on Soil Bacterial Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Tiziano Gomiero, 2015. "Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Monika Vilkiene & Ieva Mockeviciene & Grazina Kadziene & Danute Karcauskiene & Regina Repsiene & Ona Auskalniene, 2023. "Bacterial Communities: Interaction to Abiotic Conditions under Effect of Anthropogenic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Lei Wang & Xiaobo Huang & Jianrong Su, 2022. "Tree Species Diversity and Stand Attributes Differently Influence the Ecosystem Functions of Pinus yunnanensis Secondary Forests under the Climate Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land: A case study in Hunan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-97.
    7. Angela Yaneth Landínez-Torres & Jessika Lucia Becerra Abril & Solveig Tosi & Lidia Nicola, 2020. "Soil Microfungi of the Colombian Natural Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Körner, Katrin & Pfestorf, Hans & May, Felix & Jeltsch, Florian, 2014. "Modelling the effect of belowground herbivory on grassland diversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 79-85.
    9. Zhengkun Hu & Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo & Nicolas Fanin & Xiaoyun Chen & Yan Zhou & Guozhen Du & Feng Hu & Lin Jiang & Shuijin Hu & Manqiang Liu, 2024. "Nutrient-induced acidification modulates soil biodiversity-function relationships," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Xinhao Suo & Shixiong Cao, 2021. "China’s three north shelter forest program: cost–benefit analysis and policy implications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14605-14618, October.
    11. David Pires & Valeria Orlando & Raymond L. Collett & David Moreira & Sofia R. Costa & Maria L. Inácio, 2023. "Linking Nematode Communities and Soil Health under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Anita Zapałowska & Andrzej Skwiercz & Dawid Kozacki & Czesław Puchalski, 2024. "Employing Plant Parasitic Nematodes as an Indicator for Assessing Advancements in Landfill Remediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Chen Ma & Runze Nie & Guoming Du, 2023. "Responses of Soil Collembolans to Land Degradation in a Black Soil Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, March.
    14. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak & Marzena Tomaszewska & Rafał Kornas & Jacek Cymerman & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Halina Lipińska, 2020. "Legume Cover Crops as One of the Elements of Strategic Weed Management and Soil Quality Improvement. A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-41, September.
    15. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Wojciech Bierza & Joanna Czarnecka & Agnieszka Błońska & Agnieszka Kompała-Bąba & Agnieszka Hutniczak & Bartosz Jendrzejek & Jawdat Bakr & Andrzej M. Jagodziński & Dariusz Prostański & Gabriela Woźnia, 2023. "Plant Diversity and Species Composition in Relation to Soil Enzymatic Activity in the Novel Ecosystems of Urban–Industrial Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Qiuju Wang & Xin Liu & Jingyang Li & Xiaoyu Yang & Zhenhua Guo, 2021. "Straw application and soil organic carbon change: A meta-analysis," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16(2), pages 112-120.
    18. Jonas Inkotte & Barbara Bomfim & Márcio Gonçalves da Rosa & Marco Bruno Xavier Valadão & Alcides Gatto & Juscelina Arcanjo Santos & Reginaldo Sergio Pereira, 2024. "Changes in Land Use through Eucalyptus Plantations Impact Soil Fauna Communities in Brazilian Savannas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Yi-Xuan Lu & Si-Ting Wang & Guan-Xin Yao & Jing Xu, 2023. "Green Total Factor Efficiency in Vegetable Production: A Comprehensive Ecological Analysis of China’s Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Qianru Yu & Chen-Chieh Feng & NuanYin Xu & Luo Guo & Dan Wang, 2019. "Quantifying the Impact of Grain for Green Program on Ecosystem Service Management: A Case Study of Exibei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2484-:d:755314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.