IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p864-d723443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Residue Type and Method of Placement on Dynamics of Decomposition and Nitrogen Release in Maize-Wheat-Mungbean Cropping on Permanent Raised Beds: A Litterbag Study

Author

Listed:
  • Opinder Singh Sandhu

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India)

  • Mangi L. Jat

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Rajeev Kumar Gupta

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India)

  • Harmeet Singh Thind

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India)

  • Harminder Singh Sidhu

    (Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA), CIMMYT, Ladhowal 141004, India)

  • Yadvinder Singh

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India)

Abstract

Decomposition influences carbon and nutrient cycling from crop residues. The nylon-mesh-bag technique was implied to study the decomposition and N-release dynamics from different crop residues under field conditions. The four types of residues were: maize (lower than 50% below the cob), wheat (lower than 25% of wheat stubbles), a whole mung bean residue, and a mixture of wheat + mung bean residue (1:1 ratio) put on the soil surface and in below the sub-surface. Decomposition and N release from both at-surface- and below-surface-placed residues were accurately described by a single-pool first-order exponential decay function as a function of thermal time (based on the accumulative daily mean temperature). The simple first-order exponential model met the criteria of goodness of fit. Throughout the decomposition cycle (one thermal year), the rate of decomposition as measured by a decrease in residue mass and the release of total N were statistically higher from the sub-surface compared to the surface-placed residue, irrespective of the residue type. At the end of the 150-day decomposition cycle, the release of total N was highest in mung bean (32.0 kg N ha −1 ), followed by maize (31.5 kg N ha −1 ) > wheat + mung bean (16.1 kg N ha −1 ), and the minimum (6.54 kg N ha −1 ) in wheat residue. Crop residues with a wider C/N ratio such as maize and wheat, when applied on the soil surface in conservation agriculture, caused the decomposition to occur at slower rates, thereby providing long-term beneficial effects on the soil thermal regime, soil moisture conservation, and C sequestration in North-West India.

Suggested Citation

  • Opinder Singh Sandhu & Mangi L. Jat & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Harmeet Singh Thind & Harminder Singh Sidhu & Yadvinder Singh, 2022. "Influence of Residue Type and Method of Placement on Dynamics of Decomposition and Nitrogen Release in Maize-Wheat-Mungbean Cropping on Permanent Raised Beds: A Litterbag Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:864-:d:723443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vicky Singh & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & M. S. Kahlon & A. S. Toor & K. B. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Mohamed A. Mattar, 2023. "Effect of Different Tillage and Residue Management Options on Soil Water Transmission and Mechanical Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Md. Abdul Quddus & Md. Babul Anwar & Md. Khairul Alam & Razu Ahmed & Khokan Kumer Sarker & Md. Anarul Islam & Md. Torikul Islam & Mohamed I. Kobeasy & Ahmed Gaber & Sharif Ahmed, 2022. "Modification of Nutrient Requirements for a Four Crop-Based Cropping System to Increase System Productivity, Maintain Soil Fertility, and Achieve Sustainable Intensification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:864-:d:723443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.