IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1895-d1256299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Different Tillage and Residue Management Options on Soil Water Transmission and Mechanical Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Vicky Singh

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India)

  • Rajeev Kumar Gupta

    (School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar 144001, Punjab, India)

  • M. S. Kahlon

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India)

  • A. S. Toor

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India)

  • K. B. Singh

    (Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India)

  • Nadhir Al-Ansari

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden)

  • Mohamed A. Mattar

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Understanding the variability in the mechanical and hydrological soil characteristics resulting from diverse tillage and residue management practices is essential for evaluating the adoption of conservation strategies to preserve soil’s physical well-being. Zero-tillage techniques combined with residue retention or incorporation have gained widespread recognition for their capacity to conserve soil and water resources, reduce energy consumption, and enhance soil quality and environmental sustainability. Nevertheless, the choice of tillage and residue management options may vary depending on the geographical locations and specific soil conditions. To assess the impacts of four distinct tillage and residue management approaches, a two-year experiment (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) was conducted: T1: conventional tillage followed by wheat sowing after the removal of rice straw (CT-RS); T2: zero tillage with wheat sowing using a Happy Seeder while retaining rice straw (ZT+RS); T3: conventional tillage followed by wheat sowing after rice straw incorporation using a reversible mouldboard plough (CT+RS); T4: minimum tillage with wheat sowing using a Super Seeder with rice straw incorporation (MT+RS); the effects were recorded on the physical soil properties. Our findings indicate that zero tillage combined with residue retention (T2) had a positive influence on various physical soil attributes. Notably, significant differences were observed among the tillage and residue management options, particularly in terms of the bulk density with T1 exhibiting the highest values and the lowest being in T2, whereas the soil penetration resistance was lowest in T3 compared to T1. In the case of T3, sandy loam and clay loam soils had the highest measured saturated hydraulic conductivity values, measuring 5.08 and 4.57 cm h −1 and 4.07 and 3.73 cm h −1 , respectively. Furthermore, T2 (zero tillage with residue retention) demonstrated the highest mean weight diameter (MWD) and maximum water stable aggregate. These results collectively underscore the positive effects of adopting zero tillage and retaining residue (T2) on soil structure and quality, particularly concerning the mechanical and hydrological soil properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicky Singh & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & M. S. Kahlon & A. S. Toor & K. B. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Mohamed A. Mattar, 2023. "Effect of Different Tillage and Residue Management Options on Soil Water Transmission and Mechanical Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1895-:d:1256299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1895/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1895/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Opinder Singh Sandhu & Mangi L. Jat & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Harmeet Singh Thind & Harminder Singh Sidhu & Yadvinder Singh, 2022. "Influence of Residue Type and Method of Placement on Dynamics of Decomposition and Nitrogen Release in Maize-Wheat-Mungbean Cropping on Permanent Raised Beds: A Litterbag Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Abdul Quddus & Md. Babul Anwar & Md. Khairul Alam & Razu Ahmed & Khokan Kumer Sarker & Md. Anarul Islam & Md. Torikul Islam & Mohamed I. Kobeasy & Ahmed Gaber & Sharif Ahmed, 2022. "Modification of Nutrient Requirements for a Four Crop-Based Cropping System to Increase System Productivity, Maintain Soil Fertility, and Achieve Sustainable Intensification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1895-:d:1256299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.