Author
Listed:
- Md. Abdul Quddus
(Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Md. Babul Anwar
(Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Jashore 7400, Bangladesh)
- Md. Khairul Alam
(Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh
Land Management Group, Centre for Sustainable Farming Systems, Future Food Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA 6150, Australia)
- Razu Ahmed
(Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Khokan Kumer Sarker
(Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Md. Anarul Islam
(Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Md. Torikul Islam
(Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Mohamed I. Kobeasy
(Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)
- Ahmed Gaber
(Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)
- Sharif Ahmed
(International Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh Office, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh)
Abstract
Sustainable and resilient cropping intensity is now a global focus to address the food demand and nutrition security of the growing population. For sustainable intensification, maintaining soil fertility is a key concern. The nutrient management for the recently developed four crop-based cropping system in Bangladesh has not yet been studied. Hence, field experiments were conducted on the nutrient management of the four crop-based cropping system [ Aus (pre-monsoon rice), Aman (monsoon rice) , lentil, and mungbean] in calcareous soil in Bangladesh during the years of 2016/17 and 2017/18 to determine the appropriate fertilizer management package to improve crop productivity and sustain soil fertility. The experiment had six treatments assigned in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments included T 1 = control (without synthetic fertilizer), T 2 = 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), T 3 = 75% RDF, T 4 = 100% RDF, T 5 = 125% RDF, and T 6 = farmers’ practice (FP). The results revealed that the 125% RDF significantly contributed to higher yields of all four crops. The rice equivalent yield (REY) was the highest for the fertilizer management of 125% RDF, which was 45.5%, 9.4%, and 12.2% higher than the control (T 1 ), 100% RDF (T 4 ), and FP, respectively. Considering the uptake of nutrients (N, P, K, S, Zn, and B) by the crops in the cropping system, the 125% RDF was superior to the other treatments. The nutrient management practices had a positive influence on the apparent nutrient recovery (ANR) efficiency of the cropping system. The fertilizer management of 125% RDF was also economically more profitable due to the increment in the cost–benefit ratio of 26.8%, 4.4%, and 4.9% over the control, 100% RDF, and FP, respectively. The results indicate that the current fertilizer recommendations and FP for aus , aman , lentil, and mungbean are not adequate for the change from the three crop to the four crop-based pattern, and an increased dose of fertilizer is required to increase the yield of each individual crop as well as the total system’s productivity. The fertilizer use efficiency is also higher for 125% RDF than the 100% RDF and FP indicating that to sustain the soil fertility in the four crop-based system, the current RDF and FP are not sufficient. This finding will help intensive cropping areas in preventing nutrient deficiencies that would lead to a reduction in the crop yield.
Suggested Citation
Md. Abdul Quddus & Md. Babul Anwar & Md. Khairul Alam & Razu Ahmed & Khokan Kumer Sarker & Md. Anarul Islam & Md. Torikul Islam & Mohamed I. Kobeasy & Ahmed Gaber & Sharif Ahmed, 2022.
"Modification of Nutrient Requirements for a Four Crop-Based Cropping System to Increase System Productivity, Maintain Soil Fertility, and Achieve Sustainable Intensification,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7194-:d:837101
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7194-:d:837101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.